Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:07:29.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case Concerning the Continental Shelf

International Court of Justice.  24 February 1982 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

International law in general — Sources — Customary international law — Equity and equitable principles — New accepted trends of United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea — Adjudication ex aequo et bono distinguished — Informal composite negotiating text of the draft Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982

International law in general — Relation to municipal law — Relevance of Petroleum Law 1955 and oil concessions

State territory — Parts of — Boundaries — Land boundaries — Relevance of land boundary to delimitation of continental shelf — Adjacent States — Land frontier at Ras Ajdir — Coast to shelf ratio

State territory — Parts of — Boundaries — Water boundaries — Boundary of continental shelf — Delimitation between adjacent States — Equitable principles and special circumstances — Equidistance — Importance of geographical circumstances — Relevance of coastline — Islands — Coast to shelf ratio

State territory — Parts of — Territorial, waters — Breadth and delimitation of the maritime belt — Dispute between two adjacent States — Base lines — Islands

State territory — Parts of — Territorial waters — Coasting trade and fisheries — Historic fishing rights — Relevance to delimitation of continental shelf

State territory — Parts of — Islands — Whether Jerba and Kerkennahs relevant to delimitation of continental shelf — Whether termination of shelf boundary line to be stipulated — Future claims by Malta

Treaties — Interpretation of — Consideration of preparatory work Draft Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982

Disputes — International Court of Justice — Contentious jurisdiction — Competence — Special agreement between the parties — Whether specific method of delimitation requested

Disputes — International Court of Justice — Contentious jurisdiction — The law applicable — Special agreement between the parties Article 1 — Equity — Application of equitable principles distinguished from adjudication ex aequo et bono

Disputes — International Court of Justice — Contentious jurisdiction — Judgment — Special agreement between the parties — Article 1 — Court asked to specify only principles of delimitation — Specification of practical application

State territory — Parts of — Continental Shelf — Boundaries — Delimitation — Adjacent States — Equitable principles and special circumstances — Geneva Convention on Continental? — Whether identical with adjudication ex aequo et bono — Judgment — Delimitation principles — Practical application

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)