Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xq6d9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T00:47:43.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Al-Sirri v. Secretary of State for the Home Department; DD (Afghanistan) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department

United Kingdom, England.  21 November 2012 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Aliens — Refugees — Asylum applicants — Determination of refugee status — Exclusion from protection due to commission of international crimes — Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, 1951 — Article 1F(c) — Whether acts of terrorism requiring “international dimension” to constitute “acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations” — Whether armed attacks against an armed, United Nations-mandated force in principle falling within Article 1F(c) — Standard of proof — Whether “serious reasons for considering” equivalent to a criminal standard of proof — Whether membership of organization that has committed international crimes sufficient

International organizations — United Nations — Principles and purposes — United Nations Charter, Article 1 — Security Council — United Nations forces — Conflict in Afghanistan — International Security Assistance Force (“ISAF”) — Authorization by Security Council — Whether attacks on ISAF acts contrary to the purposes of the United Nations — Refugee Convention, Article 1F(c)

Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Interpretation — Charter of the United Nations, Articles 1 and 2 — Purposes and principles of the United Nations — Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, 1951 — Article 1F(c) — Terrorism Act 2000, Section 1 — Whether activities defined as terrorism under domestic law contrary to purposes and principles of United Nations — Whether activities having to constitute threat to international peace and security or to peaceful relations between nations to fall within Article 1F(c) of Refugee Convention — Whether armed attacks against armed, United Nations-mandated force falling within Article 1F(c) of Refugee Convention

Terrorism — Definition — Position under domestic law — Position under international law — Whether terrorist activities contrary to principles and purposes of United Nations — Whether international dimension or repercussions for international peace and security necessary — Whether activities falling within Article 1F(c) of Refugee Convention — The law of England

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable