Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:31:44.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Benenson, “Victorian Sexual Ideology…”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Doris M. Ladd
Doris M. Ladd
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii/Manoa
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letters
Information
International Labor and Working-Class History , Volume 26 , Fall 1984 , pp. 43 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © International Labor and Working-Class History, Inc. 1984

References

NOTES

1. ILWCH 25, 19, n. 2

2. Wittig, Monique, Les Guèrillères, trans, Kay, David Le (New York: Viking, 1971).Google Scholar

3. Engels, Frederick, The Origin of the Family, Private Properly, and the State 1884, ed. Leacock, Eleanor Burke (New York: International Publishers, 1972), 116–121.Google Scholar OK, so he said chastity and monogomy. See also Childe, V. Gordon, Man Makes Himself 1936 (New York: Mentor, 1951), Chapter 5.Google Scholar

4. Engles, , 221.Google Scholar

5. ILWCH 25, 28.