Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:03:31.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variations in races of the honeybee Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

S.K. Raina*
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, PO Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
D.M. Kimbu
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, PO Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
*
Get access

Abstract

The three races of the honeybee Apis mellifera Linnaeus in Kenya (A. m. scutellata, A. m. monticola and A. m. litorea) differ from each other with respect to size, cubital index and abdominal colour banding pattern. These differences were used to assess the extent of interbreeding and hybridization between the races. This was verified on the basis of selected morphometric traits. Bee samples were collected from traditional log hives in seven geographical locations throughout Kenya ranging from lowland Mombasa in the coastal region to the highland Kinangop ranges. The length and width of the right forewing, length of proboscis, right antenna and right hindleg were measured, and the cubital index was computed for each specimen. The bees were classified according to size and colour banding pattern. Data analysis indicated there was hybridization among the three races of A. mellifera in Kenya due to swarming and migration under seasonal pressure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aly, F. K., Eshbah, H. M. and Makadey, M. A. (1989) Studies on the proboscis and corbiculae measurements of three races of honey bee in relation to honey and pollen production in Middle Egypt. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Apiculture in Tropical Climates, Cairo, Egypt, 6–10 November 1988. International Bee Research Association, London, UK. pp. 392396.Google Scholar
Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Hepburn, H. R., Radloff, S. E. and Fuchs, S. (2000) Spatial analysis of morphological variation in African honey bees ( Apis mellifera L) on a continental scale. Apidologie 31, 191204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francesco, N. (1992) Fluctuation of forewing characters in hybrid honey bees from northeastern Italy. Journal of Apicultural Research 31, 2731.Google Scholar
Hunter, L. A., Jackman, J. A. and Sugden, E. A. (1993) Detection records of Africanized bees in Texas during 1990 and 1992. Southern Entomologist 18, 7989.Google Scholar
ICIPE (1998) 1995–1997 ICIPE Annual Scientific Report. International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, Nairobi, Kenya. 288 pp.Google Scholar
ICIPE (2000) 1998/99 ICIPE Annual Scientific Report International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology Nairobi, Kenya. 332 pp.Google Scholar
Mathew, K. P. and Mathew, S. (1990) Further observation on characters and behaviour of Apis koschevnikovi, the “red bee” of Sabah. Bee-World 71, 6166.Google Scholar
Mbaya, J. K. S. (1983) Races of honey bees in Kenya and some aspects of their behaviour MSc thesis. University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Orantes, B. F. J. and Garcia, F. P. (1995) Morphological variability of Apis mellifera iberica in different apiaries of South Spain. Journal of Apicultural Research 1, 2330.Google Scholar
Pham, X. D. and Tran, X. N. (1991) Some characteristics of Apis mellifera ligustica in Vietnam. Nganh Ong 3, 15.Google Scholar
Radloff, S. E., Hepburn, H. R., Robertson, M. P., van Hilled, R., Davidson, Z. and Ville, H. (1996) Discriminate analysis of the honey bee populations of southwestern Africa. African Entomology 4, 16.Google Scholar
Raina, S. K. (2000) The Economics of Apiculture and Sericulture Modules for Income Generation in Africa ISBN 0 86098 236 X. IBRA, UK. 86 pp.Google Scholar
Raina, S. K. (2004) A Practical Guide for Raising and Utilizing Silkworms and Honey Bees in Africa vol.1 Published in seven languages (language editions: English, French, Kiswahili ISBN 0 86098 246 7 164 pp.; English, Spanish, Luganda ISBN 0 86098 241 6 173 pp.; English, Arabic, Amharic ISBN 0 86098 247 5 182 pp.) International Bee Research Association, London, in Kenya, UK.Google Scholar
Reinsch, N., Schuster, H., Bienefeld, K. and Pirchner, F. (1991) Morphological comparison of the local bee in lower Saxony with typical Apis mellifera carnica and A.m. mellifera. Apidologie 22, 7580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinderer, T. E., Buco, S. M., Rubink, W. L., Daly, H. V., Stelzer, J. A., Riggio, R. M. and Baptista, F. C. (1993) Morphometric identification of Africanized and European honey bees using large reference populations. Apidologie 24, 569585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinderer, T. E., Oldroyd, B. P., Wongsiri, S., Sylvester, H. A., Guzman, L. I., Stelzer, J. A. and Riggio, R. M. (1995) A morphological comparison of the dwarf honey bees of southeastern Thailand Palawan, Philippines. Apidologie 26, 387394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruttner, F. (1988) Breeding Techniques and Selection for Breeding of the Honey Bee. G. Beard & Son Ltd, Brighton. 151 pp.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. (20022004) SAS Procedures Guide release 9.1 edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Stort, A. C. and Bueno, O. C. (1985) Are Apis mellifera bees morphologically Africanized in Brazil? Revista Brasileira de Biologia 45, 393397.Google Scholar
Szabo, T. I. (1990) Morphometric characteristics of Apis cerena from Sri Lanka. Apidologie 21, 505509.Google Scholar