Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:08:00.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Susceptibility of engorged adults of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini), to acaricides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

S. C. Rawlins  and
A. Mansingh
S. C. Rawlins
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of the West Indies, Kingston 7, Jamaica
A. Mansingh
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of the West Indies, Kingston 7, Jamaica
Get access

Abstract

The relative efficacy of 25 acaricides, applied topically to the engorged adults of B. microplus was in the following order: chlorfenvinphos > tetrachlorvinphos > dimethoate > chlorpyrifos > fenitrothion > dicrotophos (LC50 = 0.000897−0.00244%) > naled > propoxur > crotoxyphos > pirimiphos ethyl > coumaphos > dioxathion (LC50 = 0.00425−0.00534%) > trichlorphon > lindane > carbaryl > allyxycarb > diazinon (LC50 = 0.00737−0.0149%) > promecarb > ethion > chlorpyriphos methyl > chlormebuform (LC50 = 0.021−0.0593%) > clenpyrin > chlordimeform > pirimiphos methyl > phosphamidon (LC50 = 0.1566™0.275%).

The order of toxicity is different from their relative efficacy against the larvae of the same population of the tick. Applied implications of the results are discussed.

Keywords

Acaricidal susceptibilityBoophilus micropluscattle tick
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , December 1981 , pp. 377 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Drummond, R. O., Ernst, S. E., Trevino, J. L., Gladney, W. J. and Graham, O. H. (1973) Boophilus annulatus and B. microplus: laboratory tests of insecticides. J. econ. Ent. 66, 130–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, O. J. (1964) Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Knippling, E. F. (1966) Some basic principles in insect population suppression. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 12.Google Scholar
Knowles, C. O. and Roulston, W. J. (1973) Toxicity to Boophilus microplus of formamidine acaricides and related compounds and the modification of toxicity by certain insecticide synergists. J. econ. Ent. 66, 1245–1251.Google Scholar
Rawlins, S. C. and Mansingh, A. (1977) Susceptibility of a Jamaican strain of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) to various acaricides. Pestic. Abstr. 23, 137–142.Google Scholar
Rawlins, S. C. and Mansingh, A. (1978a). Acaricidal susceptibility of five strains of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) from four Caribbean countries. J. econ. Ent. 71, 142–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlins, S. C. and Mansingh, A. (1978b) Patterns of resistance to various acaricides in some Jamaican populations of Boophilus microplus. J. econ. Ent. 71, 956–961.Google Scholar
Mansingh, A. and Rawlins, S. C. (1979) Inhibition of oviposition in the cattle tick Boophilus microplus by certain acaricides. Pestic. Sci. 10, 485–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrado, J. M. G., Gutierrez, R. O. and Arrieta, A. P. (1972) Comparison of in vitro and in vivo activity of organo-phosphate acaricides. Revta Invest. Agropecuar. INTA, 9, 25–35.Google Scholar