Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:56:08.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sugar-cane aleurodids, Aleurolobus barodensis (Maskell) and Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett (HOM.: Aleyrodidae), and their natural enemies in Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

C. Inayatullah
C. Inayatullah
Affiliation:
Pakistan Station, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Get access

Abstract

Aleurolobus barodensis (Maskell) was more abundant than Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett on sugar-cane in Pakistan. Azotus delhiensis Lal, Eretmocerus sp., Prospaltella flava Shafee, Amitus sp. and Tetrastichus sp. parasitized nymphs and pupae of A. barodensis and E. serius Silvestri those of N. andropogonis. Chrysopa carnea Steph., Brumoides suturalis (F.), Catana parcesetosa (Sic.), Oenopia sauzeti Muls., Scymnus sp. and S. nubilus Muls. preyed on the immatures of the aleurodids.

In Peshawar valley where the crop is aerially sprayed twice a year to control Chilo infuscatellus Sn., Tryporyza nivella F., A. barodensis and Pyrilla spp., the rate of parasitism on A. barodensis was very low and its density was very high, being 330 immatures/leaf at Charsadda and 425 at Mardan in November 1979. At Sialkot (Punjab) where the crop is not sprayed, the rate of parasitism, mainly by A. delhiensis and Amitus sp., at this time was 22% and the density of A. barodensis was 70.4 immatures/leaf. The maximum rate of parasitism was 71% in January. The abundance of A. barodensis in Peshawar valley seems to be due to the mortality of natural enemies because of aerial spraying, therefore, judicious use of insecticides and redistribution of natural enemies in these areas is recommended.

Keywords

Sugar-cane whiteflyAleurolobus barodensisNeomaskellia andropogonispopulation densitiesbiological controlinsecticide resistanceAphelinidaeCoccinellidaeEulophidaePlatygasteridae
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , August 1984 , pp. 279 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmad, F., Tariq, Z. K. and Haque, H. (1970) Control of sugarcane pyrilla and whitefly by aerial application of emulsifiable concentrates at ultra-low-volume. PANS 16, 165–171.Google Scholar
Butani, D. K. (1965) Bionomics and control of sugarcane whitefly. Labdev J. Sci. Tech. 3, 159–167.Google Scholar
David, A. L., Kalyanaraman, V. M. and Narayanaswamy, P. S. (1962) Ecology and distribution of the sugarcane whitefly Aleurolobus barodensis M., in Madras State and its control. Ind. J. Sug. Res. Dev. 6, 212–216.Google Scholar
Fulmek, L. (1943) Wirtsindex der Aleyrodiden-und Cocciden-Parasiten. Ent. Beih. Berl.-Dahlem 10.Google Scholar
Inayatullah, C. and Goraya, A. A. (1980) Studies on potential biological control agents of whiteflies in Pakistan. Ann. Rept. CIBC, Pak. Stn., Rawalpindi. (Mimeographed).Google Scholar
Kapur, A. P. (1940) A note on the ladybird beetle (Coccinellidae) predating on the cane whitefly (Aleurolobus barodensis Mask.). Curr. Sci. 9, 134.Google Scholar
Khan, M. Q. and Rao, B. H. K. (1957) Pupal parasitization in Aleurolobus barodensis Mask., by Azotus delhiensis Lal. Proc. 3rd Bien. Conf. Sug. Res. Dev. Workers, Pusa, India, Pt I (abstracts), pp. 50–51.Google Scholar
Khanna, K. L. and Singh, K. P. (1951) Studies on distribution of the sugarcane whitefly (Aleurolobus barodensis Mask.) on leaves in the different regions of a cane stalk and on different parts of leaf lamina. Ind. J. Ent. 13, 95–98.Google Scholar
Lalwani, A. M. (1948) Notes on the life history of the chalcid parasite Azotus delhiensis Lal, on whitefly Aleurolobus barodensis Mask. Curr. Sci. 17, 155–156.Google Scholar
Mahmood, S. H. (1955) Morphology and biology of sugarcane whitefly (Aleurolobus barodensis Maskell) in India. Mem. ent. Soc. India 4.Google Scholar
Mound, L. A. and Halsey, S. H. (1978) Whitefly of the World. BM (Natural History), London.Google Scholar
Rafiq, M. (1976) Crop Ecological Zones of Nine Countries of the Near East Region. FAO, Rome. (Mimeographed).Google Scholar
Ramachandrachari, C., Siva Rao, D. V. and Mohan Rao, N. V. (1959) A new entomophagous fungus on cane whitefly (Aleurolobus barodensis Mask.). Madras agric. J. 46, 70.Google Scholar
Sandhu, J. S. (1966) Nature and extent of damage to sugarcane caused by whitefly (Aleurolobus barodensis Mask.) in the Punjab. J. Res. Punjab agric. Univ. 3, 414–416.Google Scholar
Sandhu, J. S. and Singh, S. (1963) Studies on the biology of sugarcane whitefly Aleurolobus barodensis Maskell. Ind. J. Sug. Res. 7, 83–88.Google Scholar
Sheikh, F. R. (1969) Control of sugarcane pests by air in Mardan district during Kharif-1964. Agric. Pakistan 4, 673–684.Google Scholar
Siddiqui, Z. A. and Saxena, A. P. (1960) Studies on the control of sugarcane whitefly and the effects of its infestation on juice quality. Ind. J. Ent. 22, 99–104.Google Scholar
Tiwari, N. K., Avasthy, P. N., Nigam, H. and Chandra, J. (1978) Parasite complex in sugarcane white fly, Aleurolobus barodensis Mask. Ind. J. Ent. 40, 446.Google Scholar