Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:22:39.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semiochemicals produced by tomato varieties and their role in parasitism of Corcyra cephalonica (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) by the egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

A.V.N. Paul ,
Madhulika Srivastava ,
Prem Dureja  and
A.K. Singh
A.V.N. Paul
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, IARI, New Delhi110012, India
Madhulika Srivastava
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology, IARI, New Delhi110012, India
Prem Dureja
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural Chemicals, IARI, New Delhi110012, India
A.K. Singh*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi110007, India
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Hexane extracts of 10 different varieties of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) obtained in the vegetative and flowering periods were studied for synomonal response of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis Ishii. Gas chromatography of leaf extracts revealed the presence of saturated hydrocarbons ranging from C14 to C29 in varying numbers and concentrations. These hydrocarbons elicited varied synomonal responses from the parasitoid. The quantity of individual hydrocarbons varied from 72 to 34,940 ppm in the vegetative period and from 4 to 46,170 ppm in the flowering period. Hexane extracts obtained during the flowering period showed a greater synomonal response compared with those obtained during the vegetative period. A better response observed for certain varieties of tomato at a particular period could be due to the presence of higher concentrations of favourable hydrocarbons relative to unfavourable ones. Synomonal activity seems to be associated mainly with tricosane, heneicosane, pentacosane and hexacosane during the vegetative period and with heneicosane and hexacosane during the flowering period. In the vegetative period, the tomato variety To-Pant-T4 elicited the highest activity as well as parasitism at the lowest concentration of 25,000 ppm, which was higher than other varieties at all concentrations. Varieties To-BT-116-32, To-BT-20-2-1 and To-Pant-T3 in the vegetative period and To-Selection-15, To-Selection-32 and To-BT-22-2-1 in the flowering period elicited higher responses than the other varieties. To-BT-20-2-1 elicited a maximum response in the flowering period, which may be due to the presence of higher relative quantities of tricosane, heneicosane and hexacosane. In view of these findings, tomato varieties with favourable semiochemicals could be exploited in an integrated pest management programme to enhance the effectiveness of the egg parasitoid T. chilonis against the fruit borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hb).

Keywords

tomatosynomoneTrichogramma chilonisCorcyra cephalonica
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 108 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altieri, M. A., Annamalai, S., Katiyar, K. P. and Flath, R. A. (1982) Effect of plant extracts on the rate of parasitisation of Anagasta kuehniella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs by Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) under green house conditions. Entomophaga 27, 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annadurai, R. S., Murugesan, S., Senrayan, R., Gurusubramanian, G. and Ananthakrishnan, T. N. (1992) Tritrophic interactions in Heliothis armigera Hübner (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) and its natural enemy systems: a chemical ecological approach, pp. 83–101. In Emerging Trends in Biological Control of Phytophagous Insects (Edited by Ananthakrishnan, T. N.). Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, India. 255 pp.Google Scholar
Dicke, M., Sabelis, M. W., Takabayashi, J., Barun, J. and Posthumus, M. A. (1990) Plant strategies of manipulating predator-prey interactions through allelochemicals: prospects for application in pest control. Journal of Chemical Ecology 16, 3091–3118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1986) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 657 pp.Google Scholar
Hendry, L. B., Wichmann, J. K., Hindenlang, D. M., Weaver, K. M. and Korzeniowski, S. H. (1976) Plants–The origin of kairomones utilized by parasitoids of phytophagous insects. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashyap, R. K., Kennedy, G. G. and Farrar, R. R. (1991) Behavioral response of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley and Telenomus sphingis (Ashmead) to trichome/methyl ketone mediated resistance in tomato. Journal of Chemical Ecology 17, 543–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, E. G., Hopper, K. R. and Powell, J. E. (1985) Biological control in agricultural IPM systems, pp. 201–227. In Analysis of Systems for Biological Control of Arthropod Pests in the USA by Augmentation of Predators and Parasites (Edited by Hoy, M. A. and Herzog, D. C.). Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
Mani, M., Krishnamoorthy, A., Gopalakrishnan, C. and Rabindra, R. J. (2001) Augmentative biocontrol within vegetable IPM - Indian Scenario, pp. 119–140. In Augmentative Biocontrol, Proceedings of the ICAR–CABI Workshop. 29 June–1 July 2000, Project Directorate of Biological Control, Bangalore (Edited by Singh, S. P., Murphy, S. T. and Ballal, C. R). CABI Bioscience, UK. 250 pp.Google Scholar
Nagarkatti, S. and Nagaraja, H. (1979) The status of Trichogramma chilonis Ishii (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Oriental Insects 13, 115–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlund, D. A., Chalfant, R. B. and Lewis, W. J. (1985a) Response of Trichogramma pretiosum females to volatile synomones from tomato plants. Journal of Entomological Science 20, 372–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlund, D. A., Chalfant, R. B. and Lewis, W. J. (1985b) Response of Trichogramma pretiosum females to extracts of two plants attacked by Heliothis zea. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 12, 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padmavathi, C. and Paul, A. V. N. (1998) Saturated hydrocarbons as kairomonal source for the egg parasitoid, Trichogramma chilonis Ishii (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 122, 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, A. V. N., Singh, S. and Singh, A. K. (2002) Kairomonal effect of some saturated hydrocarbons on the egg parasitoids, Trichogramma brasiliensis (Ashmead) and Trichogramma exiguum Pinto & Platner (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 126, 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, A. V. N. and Sreekumar, K. M. (1998) Improved technology for mass rearing of trichogrammatids and their factitious host Corcyra cephalonica, pp. 99–111. In Technology in Biological Control (Edited by Ananthakrishnan, T. N.). Oxford and IBH Pub. Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.Google Scholar
Picard, F. and Rabaud, E. (1914) External parasitism in the family Braconidae. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of France 8, 266–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W. (1991) Tritrophic influence on aphid parasitoids (Hym., Braconidae: Aphidiinae). Redia 74, 3; Appendix 129–133.Google Scholar
Smith, S. M. (1996) Biological control with Trichogramma: advances, successes, and their potential use. Annual Review of Entomology 41, 375–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Emden, H. F. (1986) The interaction of plant resistance and natural enemies: effects on populations of sucking insects, pp. 138–150. In Interactions of Plant Resistance and Parasitoids and Predators of Insects (Edited by Boethel, D. J. and Eikenbary, R. D.). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Vinson, S. B. (1976) Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 21, 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, S. B. (1991) Chemical signals used by parasitoids. Redia 74, 15–42.Google Scholar
Wajnberg, E. and Hassan, S. A. (Eds) (1994) Biological Control with Egg Parasitoids. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 286 pp.Google Scholar