Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T03:21:29.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Replacement of the royal pair in Macrotermes michaelseni

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

R. Sieber  and
J. P. E. C. Darlington
R. Sieber
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
J. P. E. C. Darlington
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

At intervals of 2 months over 1 year, 64 royal cells were removed from mounds of Macrotermes michaelseni to find out whether a new royal pair was produced. In five mounds replacement reproductives were found. Young reproductives from incipient laboratory colonies were never accepted as replacements if they were introduced after the removal of the primary reproductives. One out of 10 royal pairs was accepted if the royal cell was introduced immediately after removal of the original one, and three out of 10 survived if the royal cell was introduced 1 week after the removal of the original one.

Replacement reproductives were only produced when nymphs or alates were in the nest at the time the primary reproductives were removed. It was not possible to find out at what time after the removal a new royal pair was accepted but measurements of the replacement queens showed that they can become fully physogastric within 7 months.

Keywords

Macrotermes michaelseniMacrotermitinaeIsopteraroyal pairreplacement reproductivesalatesnymphs
Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1982 , pp. 39 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bordereau, C. (1975) Déterminisme des castes chez les termites supérieurs: mise en évidence d'un contrôle royal dans la formation de la caste sexuées chez Macrotermes bellicosus Smeathman (Isoptera, Termitidae). Insectes soc. 22, 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coaton, W. G. H. (1949) Queen removal in termite control. Fmg S. Afr. 24, 335–338.Google Scholar
Darlington, J. P. E. C. (1977) Nest structure and distribution of the population within the nest of the termite Macrotermes subhyalinus. Proc. 8th Int. Congr. IUSSI, Wageningen, pp. 246–248.Google Scholar
Harms, J. W. (1927) Koloniegründung bei Macrotermes gilvus Hag. Zool. Anz. 74, 221–236.Google Scholar
Mukerji, D. and Mitra, P. K. (1949) Ecology of the mound-building termite, Odontotermes redemanni (Wasmann) in relation to measures of control. Proc. zool. Soc. Beng. 2, 9–27.Google Scholar
Noirot, Ch. (1956) Les sexués de remplacement chez les termites supérieurs (Termitidae). Insectes soc. 3, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy-Noël, J. (1974) Contribution à la connaissance des reproducteurs de remplacement chez les termites supérieurs: observations sur Bellicositermes natalensis (Macrotermitinae). C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 278, 481–483.Google Scholar
Sieber, R. and Leuthold, R. H. (1981) Behavioural elements and their meaning in incipient colonies of the fungus growing termite Macrotermes michaelseni (Isoptera: Macrotermitinae). Insectes soc. 28, 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar