Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:30:05.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phagostimulant Activity of Sucrose, Sterols and Soybean Leaf Extract Ables to the Cabbage Looper Trichoplusia Ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

H. C. Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, 237 Russel Labs, 1630, Linden Drive University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Get access

Abstract

Phagostimulant activities of sucrose, sitosterol, stigmasterol, campesterol, and soybean leaf extractables were evaluated towards the third-instar larvae of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni Hubner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on elderberry-pith discs under laboratory conditions. There was a linear relationship between sucrose dosage and larval feeding on the pith discs. Water fraction from PI 227687 soybean leaf extractables at dosages > 400 μg/disc inhibited feeding by T. ni larvae. Ethyl acetate fraction showed phagostimulant properties comparable to sucrose. Sterols (5 μg/disc) and soybean leaf extractables (40 μg/disc) in combination with sucrose (400 μg/disc) showed synergistic effect as phagostimulants. Implications of genotypic differences in sterol content in relation to host plant resistance are discussed.

Résumé

Les activités appétitrices du sucrose, du sitostérol, du stigmastérol, du campestérol et d'extraits de feuille du soja ont été évaluées au laboratoire contre le 3éme stade larvaire de l'arpenteuse du chou, Trichoplusia ni Hubner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) sur des disques en moëlle de baie de sureau. Une relation linéaire s'est dégagée entre concentration du sucrose et consommation par la larve des disques de moëlle. La fraction aqueuse de l'extrait de feuille du soja “PI 227687” aux concentrations supérieures à 400 μg/disque a inhibé la consommation chez Trichoplusia ni. La fraction avec l'éthyl acétate a montré des propriétés appétitrices comparables au sucrose. Les stérols (5 μg/disque) et les extraits de feuille de soja (400 μg/disque), associés au sucrose (40 μg/disque) ont produit un effet synergétique en tant qu'appétents. Les implications des différences génotypiques dans le contenu en stérol en rapport avec la résistance à la plante-hôte sont discutées.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beck, S. D. (1965) Resistance of plants to insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 10, 207232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. D. and Hanec, W. (1958) Effects of amino acids on feeding behaviour of the European corn borer, Pyrausta nubilalis (Hubner). J. Insect Physiol. 2, 8596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doss, R. P. (1983) Activity of obscure root weevil. Sciopithes obscurus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), phagostimulants individually and in combination. Environ. Entomol. 13, 848851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doss, R. P., Luthi, R., Edelman, D. L. and Hrutford, B. F. (1982) Sitosterol and quercetin 3-galactoside, obscure root weevil feeding stimulants from Rhododendron. J. Agric. Fd. Chem. 30, 10791082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T. and Pennington, J. S. (1971) Stage of development descriptions for soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci. 11, 929931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gothilf, S. and Beck, S. D. (1967) Larval feeding behaviour of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. J. Insect Physiol. 13, 10391054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunwald, C. and Kogan, M. (1981) Sterols of soybeans differing in insect resistance and maturity group. Phytochem. 20, 765768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, D. M. and Baker, J. E. (1967) Feeding responses of the beetle Scolytus to chemical stimuli in the bark of Ulmus. J. Insect Physiol. 13, 955962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoonhoven, L. M. (1972) Some aspects of host plant selection and feeding in phytophagous insects. In Insect and Mite Nutrition (Edited by Rodriguez, J. G.). North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Shanks, C. H. Jr and Doss, R. P. (1987) Feeding responses by adults of five species of weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to sucrose and sterols. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 80, 4146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, H. C. and Norris, D. M. (1991) Chemical basis of resistance in soybean to cabbage looper. Trichoplusia ni. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 55, 353364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, M. H. and Hale, R. L. (1965) Mass rearing of the larvae of nine noctuid species on a simple artificial medium. J. Econ. Entomol. 58, 522524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tester, C. F. (1977) Constituents of soybean cultivars differing in insect resistance. Phytochem. 16, 18991901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorsteinson, A. J. (1953) The chemotactic responses that determine host specificity in an oligophagous insect (Plutella maculipennis (Curt.)). Canadian J. Zool. 31, 5272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorsteinson, A. J. (1960) Host selection in phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 5, 193218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorsteinson, A. J. and Nayar, J. K. (1963) Plant phospholipids as feeding stimulants for grasshoppers. Canadian J. Zool. 41, 931935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar