Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:04:17.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Novel Associations and Importation Biological Control: The Need for Ecological and Physiological Equivalencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Robert N. Wiedenmann  and
J. W. Smith Jr
Robert N. Wiedenmann
Affiliation:
center for Economic Entomology, Illinois Natural History Survey 607 E. Peabody, Champaign, IL 61820, USA
J. W. Smith Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843, USA
Get access

Abstract

One tactic of importation of natural enemies for biological control of stemborers and other pests is the use of parasite species that have had no previous association with the pest. This ‘novel association’ approach offers the possibility of using parasites that have proven effective against a stemborer species other than the target stemborer pest. Nevertheless, creation of a novel host-parasite association requires that the novel host be ecologically and physiologically equivalent to the ancestral host. Selecting natural enemies based on ecological and physiological equivalence offers the best possibility of temporal, behavioural, nutritional and immunological compatibility in the host-parasite interaction, and reduces the chances of failure with the imported parasite species.

Keywords

parasitoidnew associationstemborerPyralidaeNoctuidaeBraconidaeparasitoïdenouvelle associationforeur de tigesPyralidaeNoctuidaeBraconidae
Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 17 , Special Issue 1: Ecology and Management of Tropical Gramineous Stemborers , March 1997 , pp. 51 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alam, M. M., Bennett, F. D. and Carl, K. P. (1971) Biological control of Diatraea saccharalis (F.) in Barbados by Apanteles flavipes Cam. and Lixophaga diatraeae T. T. Entomophaga 16, 151–158.Google Scholar
Austin, A. D. and Dangerfield, P. C. (1989) The taxonomy of New World microgastrine braconids (Hymenoptera) parasitic o. Diatraea spp. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 79, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, F. D. (1969) Tachinid flies as biological control agents for sugar cane moth borers, pp. 117–148. In Pests of Sugar Cane (Edited by Williams, J. R., Metcalfe, J. R., Mungomery, R. W. and Mathes, R.). Elsevier, Amsterdam. 568 pp.Google Scholar
Bleszynski, S. (1969) The taxonomy of the crambine moth borers of sugar cane, pp. 11–59. In Pests of Sugarcane (Edited by Williams, J. R., Metcalfe, J. R., Mungomery, R. W. and Mathes, R.). Elsevier, Amsterdam. 568 pp.Google Scholar
Bleszynski, S. (1970) A revision of the world species o. Chilo Zincken (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist., Entomol. 25, 101–195.Google Scholar
Botelho, P. S. M. (1992) Quinze anos de controle biológico d. Diatraea saccharalis utilizando parasitóides. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasiliera 27, 255–262.Google Scholar
Box, H. E. (1938) Observations on sugar-cane moth borers (Diatraea spp.) in St. Lucia—III. Castries, St. Lucia, B. W. I. 25 pp.Google Scholar
Box, H. E. (1949) Some considerations upon the dipterous parasites of the sugar cane moth borer. Diatraea saccharalis (Fabr.), Mewz. Asoc. Tec. Azuc. Cuba 23, 17–27. Havana, Cuba.Google Scholar
Caltagirone, L. E. (1981) Landmark examples in classical biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBach, P. and Rosen, D. (1991) Biological Control by Natural Enemies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 440 pp.Google Scholar
Doutt, R. L. (1959) The biology of parasitic Hymenoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 4, 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drooz, A. T., Bustillo, A. E., Fedde, F. G. and Fedde, V. H. (1977) North American egg parasite successfully controls a different host genus in South America. Science 197, 390–391.Google Scholar
Freeland, W. J. (1983) Parasites and the coexistence of animal host species. Am. Nat. 121, 223–236.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. W., Huffman, F. R. and Smith, J. W. Jr (1979) Introduction and establishment o. Apanteles flavipes (Hym.:Braconidae) on Diatraea saccharalis (Lep.: Pyralidae) in Texas. Entomophaga 24, 109–114.Google Scholar
Hall, R. W., Ehler, L. E. and Bisabri-Ershadi, B. (1980) Rate of success in classical biological control of arthropods. Bull. Ent. Soc. Amer. 26, 111–114.Google Scholar
Hokkanen, H. M. T. (1990) New approaches in biological control, pp. 185–198. In CRC Handbook of Pest Management in Agriculture, 2nd edition (Edited by Pimentel, D.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 325 pp.Google Scholar
Hokkanen, H. M. T. and Pimentel, D. (1984) New approach for selecting biological control agents. Can. Entomol. 116, 1109–1121.Google Scholar
Hokkanen, H. M. T. and Pimentel, D. (1989) New associations in biological control: Theory and practice. Can. Entomol. 121, 829–840.Google Scholar
Huffaker, C. B., Messenger, P. S. and Debach, P. (1971) The natural enemy component in natural control and the theory of biological control, pp. 16–67. In Biological Control (Edited by Huffaker, C. B.). Plenum Press, New York. 511 pp.Google Scholar
Knutson, L., Sailer, R. I., Murphy, W. L., Carlson, R. W. and Dogger, J. R. (1990) Computerized data base of immigrant insects. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 83, 1–8.Google Scholar
Laing, J. E. and Hamai, J. (1976) Biological control of insect pests and weeds by imported parasites, predators, and pathogens, pp. 685–743. In Theory and Practice of Biological Control (Edited by Huffaker, C. B. and Messenger, P. S.). Academic Press, New York. 788 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. J., Vet, L. E. M., Tumlinson, J. H., van Lenteren, J. C. and Papaj, D. R. (1990) Variations in parasitoid foraging behavior: Essential element of a sound biological control theory. Environ. Entomol. 19, 1183–1193.Google Scholar
Lockwood, J. A. (1993) Environmental issues involved in biological control of rangel and grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) with exotic agents. Environ. Entomol. 22, 503–518.Google Scholar
Mahadeo, C. R. (1985) Present status of indigenous and imported parasites for the control of the sugarcane stem borer complex (Diatraea spp.) in Trinidad. Entomol. Newsl. 17, 7–8.Google Scholar
Mason, W. R. M. (1981) The polyphyletic nature of Apanteles Foerster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): A phylogeny and reclassification of Microgastrinae. Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 115. 147 pp.Google Scholar
Mohyuddin, A. I. (1990) Utilization of natural enemies for the control of insect pests of sugar-cane. Insect Sci. Applic. 12, 19–26.Google Scholar
Mohyuddin, A. I. and Greathead, D. J. (1970) An annotated list of the parasites of graminaceous stem borers in East Africa, with a discussion of their potential in biological control. Entomophaga 15, 241–274.Google Scholar
Myers, J. G. (1932) The original habitat and hosts of three major sugarcane pests of tropical America (Diatraea, Castnia an. Tomaspis). Bull. Entomol. Res. 23, 257–271.Google Scholar
Ngi-Song, A. J. (1995) Parasitization of selected African stemborers by Cotesia flavipes Cameron and Cotesia sesamiae (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) with emphasis on host selection and host suitability. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Ghana. 200 pp.Google Scholar
Ngi-Song, A., Overholt, W. A. and Ayertey, J. N. (1995) Suitability of African gramineous stemborers for development o. Cotesia flavipes and Cotesia sesamiae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Environ. Entomol. 24, 978–984.Google Scholar
Odum, E. P. (1971) Fundamentals of Ecology. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia. 574 pp.Google Scholar
Overholt, W. A., Ngi-Song, A. J., Kimani, S. K., Mbapila, J., Lammers, P. and Kioko, E. (1994) Ecological considerations of theintroduction of Cotesia flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) for biological control of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in Africa. Biocontr. News Info. 15, 19N–24N.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D. (1963) Introducing predators and parasites to control native pests. Can. Entomol. 95, 785–792.Google Scholar
Potting, R. P. J., Vet, L. E. M. and Dicke, M. (1995) Host microhabitat location by the stemborer parasitoi. Cotesia flavipes: The role of locally and systemically induced plant volatiles. J. Chem Ecol. 21, 525–539.Google Scholar
Read, D. P., Feeny, P. P. and Root, R. B. (1970) Habitat selection by the aphid parasit. Diaeretiella rapae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) and hyperparasite Charips brassicae (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Can. Entomol. 102, 1567–1578.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-del-Bosque, L. A., Smith, J. W. Jr and Browning, H. W. (1990) Feeding and pupation sites o. Diatraea lineolata, D. saccharalis and Eoreuma loftini (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in relation to corn phenology. J. Econ. Entomol. 83, 850–855.Google Scholar
Salt, G. (1935) Experimental studies in insect parasitism. III. Host selection. Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 117B, 414–435.Google Scholar
Smith, J. W. Jr, Wiedenmann, R. N. and Overholt, W. A. (1993) Parasites of Lepidopteran Stemborers of Tropical Gramineous Plants. ICIPE Science Press, Nairobi. 89 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, J. W. Jr, Wiedenmann, R. N. (1997) Foraging strategies of stemborer parasites and the application to biological control. Insect Sci. Applic. 17, 37–49 (this issue).Google Scholar
Stiling, P. (1990) Calculating the establishment rates of parasitoids in classical biological control. Amer. Entomol. 36, 225–230.Google Scholar
Strand, M. R. and Pech, L. L. (1995) Immunological basis for compatibility in parasitoid-host relationships. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40, 31–56.Google Scholar
Tumlinson, J. H., Lewis, W. J. and Vet, L. E. M. (1993) How parasitic wasps find their hosts. Sci. American 266, 100–106.Google Scholar
Turlings, T. C. J., Tumlinson, J. H., Eller, F. J. and Lewis, W. J. (1991) Larval-damaged plants: Source of volatile synomonethat guide the parasite parasitoi. Cotesia marginiventris to the micro-habitat of its hosts. Entomol. exp. Appl. 58, 75–82.Google Scholar
Turlings, T. C. J., Tumlinson, J. H. and Lewis, W. J. (1990) Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250, 1251–1253.Google Scholar
U. S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1993) Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States. OTA-F-565. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington. 391 pp.Google Scholar
Vet, L. E. M. and Dicke, M. (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37, 141–172.Google Scholar
Vet, L. E. M., Lewis, W. J., Papaj, D. R. and van Lenteren, J. C. (1990) A variable-response model for parasitoid foraging behavior. J. Insect Behav. 3, 471–490.Google Scholar
Vinson, S. B. (1976) Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 21, 109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, S. B. and Iwantsch, G. F. (1980) Host regulation by insect parasitoids. Q. Rev. Biol. 55, 143–165.Google Scholar
Waage, J. K. (1990) Ecological theory and the selection of biological control agents, pp. 135–158. In Critical Issues in Biological Control (Edited by Mackauer, M., Ehler, L. E. and Roland, J.). Intercept Press, Andover, Hants, UK. 330 pp.Google Scholar
Waage, J. K. and Greathead, D. J. (1988) Biological control: Challenges and opportunities. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 318, 111–126.Google Scholar
Wiedenmann, R. N. and Smith, J. W. Jr (1995) Parasitization o. Diatraea saccharalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) by Cotesia chilonis and C. flavipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Environ. Entomol. 24, 950–961.Google Scholar
Zwolfer, H., Ghani, M. A. and Rao, V. P. (1976) Foreign exploration and importation of natural enemies, pp. 189–207. In Theory and Practice of Biological Control (Edited by Huffaker, C. B. and Messenger, P. S.). Academic Press, New York. 788 pp.Google Scholar