Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:13:49.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Models for pest control using sex pheromones and chemosterilants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

H. J. Barclay
Affiliation:
Pacific Forestry Centre, 506 W. Burnside Road, Victoria, B.C., Canada V8Z 1M5
Get access

Abstract

Twelve models are presented to examine the feasibility of using pheromone baited traps containing chemosterilant for pest control, and to compare the efficiency of this method with the use of (i) pheromone baited traps containing insecticide, and (ii) sterile releases. It was found that the number of matings per individual has little effect on the efficiency of population control, whereas immigration of even a relatively small number of the pest species severely limits this method in its ability to control the population. The existence of density-dependent regulation on the other hand greatly enhances the effectiveness of this control method. If the birth rate greatly exceeds one young per adult per day, then the method using chemosterilants is approximately twice as efficient as either insecticides in the pheromone traps or the release of sterile males. However, if the birth rate is much less than one per day, as in tsetse, then chemosterilants are very much more efficient than either method. These differences in relative efficiency appear to depend on the frequency of mating relative to the birth and mortality rates.

Résumé

On présente douze modèles pour étudier la possibilité d'utiliser des pièges amorcés à phéromones et contenant un chémostérilisant dans la lutte contre les insectes, et pour comparer l'efficacité de cette méthode avec celle de l'utilisation (i) de pièges amorcés à phéromones et contenant un insecticide, et (ii) de libérations d'insectes stériles. On a pu constater que le nombre des accouplements par individu n'a qu'un effet marginal sur l'efficacité de la suppression des populations, alors que l'immigration même d'une nombre relativement restreint de l'espèce en question limite sensiblement l'efficacité de cette méthode. L'existence d'une régulation à partir de la densité augmente au contraire l'efficacité de cette méthode de suppression. Si le taux des naissances dépasse grandement une par adulte par jour, la méthode des chémostérilisants est à peu près deux fois plus efficace que l'utilisation d'insecticides dans les pièges ou la libération de mâles stériles. Mais, si le taux des naissances est beaucoup inférieur à une par jour (c'est le cas des tsé-tsé), les chémostérilisants sont nettement plus efficaces que ces autres méthodes. Ces différences dans l'efficacité relative semblent bien dépendre de la fréquence de l'accouplement par rapport aux taux de naissance et de mortalité.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allsopp, R., Hall, D. and Jones, T. (1985) Fatal attraction for the tsetse fly. New Scientist 1481, 4043.Google Scholar
Barclay, H. J. (1981) Population models on the release of chemosterilants for pest control. J. Appl. Ecol. 18, 679695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, H. J. (1982) The sterile release method with unequal male competitive ability. Ecol. Modelling 15, 251263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, H. J. (1984) Pheromone trapping models for pest control: effects of mating patterns and immigration. Res. Popul. Ecol. 26, 303311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, H. J. and Mackauer, M. (1980) The sterile insect release method for pest control: a density dependent model. Environ. Entomol. 9, 810817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, H. J. and van den Driessche, P. (1983) Pheromone trapping models for insect pest control. Res. Popul. Ecol. 25, 105115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, H. J. and van den Driessche, P. (1984) Pheromone trapping for male annihilation: a density-dependent model. Prot. Ecol. 7, 281289.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1955) The natural history of tsetse flies. H. K. Lewis, London.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. E., van den Driessche, P. and Barclay, H. J. (1985) A density-dependent model of pheromone trapping. Theor. Popul. Biol. 27, 91104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, J. P. (1963) The distribution and abundance of tsetse. MacMillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
House, A. P. R. (1982) Chemosterilization of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood and G. pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae) in the field. Bull. Entom. Res. 72, 6570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klassen, W. and Creech, J. F. (1971) Suppression of pest population with sterile male insects. USDA, ARS Misc. Pub. No. 1183, 7 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knipling, E. F. (1955) Possibilities of insect population control or eradication through the use of sexually sterile males. J. Econ. Entom. 48, 459–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knipling, E. F. and McGuire, J. U. (1966) Population models to test theoretical effects of sex attractants used for insect control. USDA, ARS, Information Bull. No. 308, 20 pp.Google Scholar
La Brecque, G. C. and Meifert, D. W. (1966) Control of house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in poultry houses with chemosterilants. J. Med. Entom. 3, 232326.Google ScholarPubMed
Langley, P. A., Coates, T. W., Carlson, D. A., Vale, G. A. and Marshall, J. (1982) Prospects for autosterilization of tsetse flies, Glossina spp. (Diptera: Glossinidae), using sex pheromone and bisazir in the field. Bull. Entom. Res. 72, 319327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, P. A. and Weidhaas, D. (1986) Trapping as a means of controlling tsetse, Glossina spp. (Diptera: Glossinidae): the relative merits of killing and sterilization. Bull. Ent. Res. 76, 8995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, R. E. and Howard, W. E. (1973) Prospects of chemosterilant and genetic control of rodents. Bull. Wld. Hlth. Org. 48, 309316.Google ScholarPubMed
Nash, T. A. M. (1969) Africa's bane: the tsetse fly. Collins, London.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C. (1969) An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Redfern, M. (1986) Tsetse traps stop trypanosomes. New Scientist 1497, 22.Google Scholar