Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:24:21.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Incidence and yield losses in three cowpea varieties due to the leaf beetle, Ootheca mutabilis Sahl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Michael O. Ashamo
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Screen house studies on the incidence and yield losses in three cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) varieties, TV × 3236, Ife Brown and Ife Bimpe due to the leaf beetle Ootheca mutabilis Sahl were carried out. Artificial infestation was done at two growth stages of cowpea: the 5-leaf stage (2 weeks after emergence) and 4 weeks after emergence. Variety TV×3236 was found to be the least susceptible, while var. Ife Bimpe was the most susceptible to leaf beetle damage. Young plants were more susceptible than older ones.

Flowering was delayed in plants infested with beetles and the extent of defoliation had a pronounced effect on the yield of cowpea.

The percentage grain yield loss ranged from 19.48% to 59.77% depending on level of beetle infestation, variety and age of the plant at infestation.

Résumé

Des études ont été menées en serres de criblage, afin de déterminer l'incidence et la perte en rendements chez trois variétés (TV×3236, Ife Brown et Ife Bimpe) de niébé (Vigna unguiculata), suite à l'attaque parla chrysomèle mineuse des feuilles, Ootheca mutabilis Sahl. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). L'infestation artificielle des plantes a été faite à deux différentes périodes de croissance du niébé: à 2 et à 4 semaines après la levée. La variété TV×3236 était la plus résistante, tandis que la variété Ife Bimpe fut la plus sensible à l'attaque due au coléoptère. Les jeunes plants étaient plus sujets à l'attaque que ceux à l'âge avancé, peu importe la variété. La floraison était retardée chez les plants attaqués et l'importance de la défoliation avait un effet marqué sur les rendements du niébé.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chant, S. R. (1959) Viruses of cowpeas, Vigna unguiculata Walp. in Nigeria. Ann. Appl. Biol. 47, 565572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horber, E. (1980) Types and classification of resistance, pp. 1522. In Breeding Plants Resistant to Insects (Edited by Maxwell, F. G. and Jennings, P. R.). John Wiley and Sons, New York, Chichester, Toronto.Google Scholar
Okigbo, B. N. (1978) Grain legumes in the agriculture of the tropics, pp. 4149. In Pests of Grain Legumes: Ecology and Control (Edited by Singh, S. R., van Emden, H. F. and Taylor, T. A.). Academic Press, London/New York.Google Scholar
Raheja, A. K. (1981) Status of Ootheca mutabilis as a pest of cowpea in northern Nigeria. Samaru Agric. Res. 1, 111118.Google Scholar
Shoyinka, S. A. (1974) Status of virus diseases of cowpea in Nigeria, pp. 171190. In Proc. of the 1st IITA Grain Legume Improvement Workshop, IITA, Ibadan. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Singh, S. R. and Emden, H. F. van (1979) Insect pests of grain legumes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 24, 255278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, G. R. D. and Torrie, J. H. (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics—A Biometrie Approach. 2nd Ed.McGraw-Hall Book Company, Auckland, London, Tokyo, 633 pp.Google Scholar
Steele, W. M. (1972) Cowpeas in Nigeria. Thesis submitted for the Doctorate degree of the University of Reading, UK.Google Scholar
Steele, W. M., Allen, D. J. and Summerfield, R. J. (1985) Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp), pp. 6569. In Grain Legume Crops (Edited by Summerfield, R. J. and Roberts, E. H.). Academic Press, New York/London.Google Scholar