Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:08:43.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host-induced augmented reproduction in spotted bollworm, Earias Vittella (fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

A. J. Tamhankar ,
K. K. Gothi  and
G. W. Rahalkar
A. J. Tamhankar
Affiliation:
Nuclear Agriculture Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay Bombay 400 085, India
K. K. Gothi
Affiliation:
Nuclear Agriculture Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay Bombay 400 085, India
G. W. Rahalkar
Affiliation:
Nuclear Agriculture Division Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay Bombay 400 085, India
Get access

Abstract

Mating and oviposition of Earias vittella was studied in the absence or presence of the host (okra fruit) or the host odour. When the host was accessible, there was a significant increase in the frequency of copulation, the number of spermatophores transferred and the number of eggs oviposited. Availability of host odour, instead of the host, gave similar results. Further, in general, the number of eggs oviposited by a female was significantly correlated with its mating frequency.

Résumé

On a etudié l'accouplement et la ponte d'Earias vittella en présence ou en absence de I'hote (gombo) ou quand les adultes ont recu I'odeur de I'hôte. Quand I'hôte était accessible, il y avait une augmentation significative dans la fréquence de copulation, le nombre de spermatophores transferés et le nombre d'ouefs pondus. La disponibilité de I'odeur de I'hôte au lieu de I'hôte, a donné les mêmes resultats.

De plus, en générate, le nombre d'oeufs pondus par la femelle était en corrélation significative avec la frequence de son accouplement.

Keywords

Spotted bollwormEarias vittellamating frequencyfecundityhosthost-odourokra fruit.
Type
Research Artilces
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , June 1993 , pp. 371 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gilbert, L. E. (1972) Pollen feeding and reproductive biology of Heliconius butterflies. Proc. natl. Acad. Sci. USA 69, 1403–1407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberhauser, K. S. (1989) Effects of spermatophores on male and female monarch butterfly reproductive success. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert, P. C. (1986) Les relations plantes-insects phytophages chez les femelles pondeuses: le role des stimulus chimiques et physiques. Une mise an point bibliographique. Agronomie 6, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, W. J. (1969) Stimulation of mating and oviposition of hickery shuckworm moth by pecan nuts. J. Econ. Entomol 62, 1244–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, J. W. and Callahan, P. S. (1967) Laboratory mating studies of the corn earworm Heliothis zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 60, 1066–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamhankar, A. J. (1992) Interspecific sex attraction Earias vittella and Earias insulana. Insect Sci. Applic. 13, 35–39.Google Scholar
Tamhankar, A. J., Gothi, K. K. and Rahalkar, G. W. (1989) Responsiveness of Earias vittella Earias insulana males to their female sex Insect Sci. Applic. 10, 625–630.Google Scholar
Watanabe, M. (1988) Multiple matings increase the fecundity of the yellow swallow tail butterfly, Papilio xuthus L. J. Insect. Behav. 1, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar