Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:41:12.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glossina pallidipes Virus: Its Potential for Use in Biological Control of Tsetse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

M. O. Odindo
M. O. Odindo
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, P.O. Box 30, Mbita, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Laboratory-reared tsetse, Glossina pallidipes were inoculated with the tsetse virus by microinjection into the haemocoel, and feeding through micropipettes. The inoculated tsetse were reared on rabbits for 45 days, and feeding, flight and mating activities recorded. The tsetse were dissected and the conditions of the salivary glands and gonads noted. In males, tsetse were examined under a compound microscope and the presence of spermatozoa noted. F1 pupae were allowed to emerge, dissected, and the salivary glands examined for hypertrophy, and the gonads for sterility.

There was no reduction in the activity of inoculated tsetse. Infection level was 23.5% in the treated adults. All infected ♂♂ were sterile while ♀♀ were fertile. There was no significant difference in the maternal age at larviposition, F1 pupal weight, or incubation period of F1 pupae, between treated and untreated tsetse.

A high proportion of F1 adults (65%) were infected, with category four hypertrophied salivary glands. All males with enlarged glands were sterile. The evidence obtained shows that the tsetse virus may be used in biological control of G. pallidipes.

Résumé

Des tsé-tsé Glossina pallidipes élevées au laboratoire ont été inoculées avec le virus de tsé-tsé par micro-injection dans le sang et par alimentation par micropipettes. Les tsé-tsé inoculées furent elevées sur des lapins pendant 45 jours et leurs activités relatives â l'alimentation, au vol et accouplement furent enregistrées. Les tsé-tsé furent disséquées et l'etat des glandes salivaires et gonades relevé. Après leur emergence les chrysalides de la génération F1 etaient dissequées; leurs glandes salivaires et gonades examinées pour hypertrophie et sterilité.

Il n'y avait pas de reduction de l'activité chez les tsé-tsé inoculées. Chez les adultes traités, le niveau d'infection était de 23,5%. Tous les mâles infectés étaient steriles par contre les femelles fertiles. Il n'y a pas eu de difference significative dans l'âge de femelles à la larviposition, le poids des nymphes F1, ou la durée d'incubation des nymphes F1 entre les tsé-tsé traitées celles qui ne l'étaient pas. Une importante proportion des adultes à la génération F1 infectés avaient des glandes salivaires hypertrophiées tombant dans la catégorie 4, Tous les mâles ayant des glandes hypertrophiées étaient steriles. Il a étè demontréque le virus de tsé-tsé puisse être utilisé dans la lutte biologique contre G. pallidipes.

Keywords

Glossina pallidipesvirussterilitymale tsetsetransovarial transmissionbiological controlGlossina pallidipesvirusstérilitémouches tsé-tsé mâlestransmission ovariennelutte biologique
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , June 1988 , pp. 399 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Challier, A., Eyraud, M., Lafaye, A. and Laveissiere, C. (1977) Amélioration du rendement du piège biconique pour glossines (Diptera, Glossinidae) par l'emploi d'un cone supérieur bleu. Cah. ORSTOM, sér. Ent. méd. Parasitol. 15, 283–286.Google Scholar
FAO/IAEA (1981) Application of the sterility principle for tsetse fly eradication or control. At. Energy Rev. 10.Google Scholar
Gouteux, J.-P. (1987) Prevalence of enlarged salivary glands in Glossina palpalis, G. pallicera, and G. nigrofusca (Diptera: Glossinidae) from the Vavoua area, Ivory Coast. J. Med. Ent. 24, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaenson, T. G. T. (1978) Virus-like rods associated with salivary gland hyperplasia in tsetse Glossina pallidipes. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 72, 234–238.Google Scholar
Jaenson, T. G. T. (1986) Sex ratio distortion and reduced lifespan of Glossina pallidipes infected with the virus causing salivary gland hyperplasia. Ent. exp. appl. 41, 265–271.Google Scholar
Marschall, K. J. (1980) Coconuts. In Proceedings of Workshops in Insect Pest Management with Microbial Agents: Recent Achievements, Deficiencies, and Innovations, IPRC. Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Mews, A. R., Baumagartner, H., Lugar, D. and Offori, E. D. (1976) Colonization of Glossina morsitans morsitans West. (Diptera, Glossinidae) in the laboratory using in vitro techniques. Bull. ent. Res. 65, 631–642.Google Scholar
Mews, A. R., Langley, P. A., Pimpley, R. W. and Flood, M. E. T. (1977) Large-scale rearing of tsetse flies (Glossina spp.) in the absence of a living host. Bull. ent. Res. 67, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odindo, M. O. (1982) Incidence of salivary gland hypertrophy in field populations of the tsetse Glossina pallidipes on the south Kenya coast. Insect Sci. Applic. 3, 59–64.Google Scholar
Odindo, M. O. and Amutalla, P. A. (1986) Distribution pattern of the virus of Glossina pallidipes Austen in a forest ecosystem. Insect Sci. Applic. 7, 79–84.Google Scholar
Odindo, M. O., Payne, C. C., Crook, N. E. and Jarrett, P. (1986) Properties of a novel DNA virus from the tsetse fly (Glossina pallidipes). J. gen. Virol. 67, 527–536.Google Scholar
Odindo, M. O., Sabwa, D. M., Amutalla, P. A. and Otieno, W. A. (1981) Preliminary tests on the transmission of virus-like particles to Glossina pallidipes. Insect Sci. Applic. 2, 219–221.Google Scholar
Otieno, L. H., Kokwaro, E. D., Chimtawi, M. and Onyango, P. (1980) Prevalence of enlarged salivary glands in wild populations of Glossina pallidipes in Kenya with a note on the affected organ. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 36, 113–118.Google Scholar
Payne, C. C. (1982) Insect viruses as control agents. Parasitology 84, 35–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar