Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:59:24.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic Expression of the Spotted Stem Borer, Chilo Partellus (Swinhoe) Resistance in Three Maize Crosses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

R. S. Pathak
R. S. Pathak
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P. O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Genetic analyses were carried out to determine inheritance of resistance, heterotic effects and reciprocal effects for resistance to the spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus in three maize crosses. Resistance was found dominant over susceptibility. Highly significant heterosis was detected for percentage dead hearts. Both additive and nonadditive gene effects were important in the inheritance of resistance to C. partellus in all crosses. Additive gene effects were highly significant for all the three resistance parameters: leaf-feeding, dead hearts and stem tunnelling. However, a high magnitude of nonadditive (dominance and epistatic) gene effects were detected for dead hearts. No cytoplasmic effects were detected in reciprocal crosses between resistant and susceptible maize lines, suggesting that the resistance to C. partellus is conferred only by nuclear genes. Recurrent selection methods should be used to accumulate alleles for resistance. Resistant F1 hybrids could be developed between resistant and susceptible lines in reciprocal combinations.

Résumé

Les études génetiques ont été conduites dans trois croisements de maïs pour déterminer l'acquisition héréditaire de la résistance, les effets hétérotiques et inverses de la résistance au boreur de tiges, Chilo partellus. La résistance s'est montrée dominante sur la sensibilité. Une dominance très hautement significative pour la casse de tiges a été observée parmi les descendants. Les effets des gènes additif et non additif ont été détérminantes dans l'acquisition de la résistance au C. partellus dans tous les croisements. Les effets de gène additif ont été hautement significatifs pour tous les trois paramètres de résistance: dégât de feuilles, casse et galeries de tiges. Cependant, une grande ampleur des effets de gène non additif (dominance et interallèle) a été observée pour la casse de tiges. Les effets cytoplasmiques n'ont pas été observés dans les croisements inverses, entre les lignées de maïs résistantes et sensibles. Ceci suggère que la résistance au C. partellus est conférée par les gènes nucléiques. Des méthodes de séléction appropriées doivent être utilisées pour accumuler les allèles de la résistance. Les hybrides F1 résistants peuvent être développés entre les lignées résistantes et sensibles dans des croisements inverses.

Keywords

GeneticsChilo partellusresistancesusceptibleadditivedominanceepistaticreciprocal effectsheterosisbreeding strategiesGénetiqueChilo partellusrésistancesensibleadditifdominanceinterallèliqueeffets inverses“heterosis”stratégies de séléction
Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 12 , Issue 1-2-3: Current Topics in Tropical Entomology , June 1991 , pp. 147 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ampofo, J. K. O., Dabrowski, Z. T. and Omolo, E. O. (1986a) Registration of germplasm lines of maize. Crop Sci. 26, 650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ampofo, J. K. O., Saxena, K. N., Kibuka, J. G. and Nyangiri, E. O. (1986b) Evaluation of some maize culitvars for resistance to the stem-borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in western Kenya. Maydica 61, 379–389.Google Scholar
Dabrowski, Z. T. and Nyangiri, E. O. (1983) Some field and screenhouse experiments on maize resistance to Chilo partellus under western Kenya conditions. Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 109–118.Google Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. (Second edition), John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. D. (1989) Breeding maize and sorghum for resistance to the European corn borer. In Proc. International Workshop on Sorghum Stem Borers, 17–20 Nov. 1987 ICRISAT Center, Patancheru, A. P. 502 324, India. pp. 169–175.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. D. and Russel, W. A. (1988) Breeding methodologies and genetic basis of resistance in maize to the European corn borer. In International Symposium on Methodologies for Developing Resistance to Insects, March 8–13 1987, Texcoco, Mexico. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico City.Google Scholar
Hallauer, A. R. and Miranda, J. B. (1981) Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Hayman, B. I. (1958) The separation of epistasis from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Heredity 12, 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, C. W., Russel, W. A. and Guthrie, W. D. (1974a) Genetics of resistance in maize to first and second-brood European corn borer. Crop Sci. 14, 393–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, C. W., Russell, W. A., Guthrie, W. D. and Grindeland, R. L. (1974b) Genetics of resistance in maize to second-brood European corn borer. Iowa State J. Res. 48, 267–280.Google Scholar
Klenke, J. R., Russell, W. A. and Guthrie, W. D. (1986a) Grain yield reduction caused by second-generation European corn borer in “Bs9” corn synthetic. Crop Sci. 26, 859–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klenke, J. R., Russell, W. A. and Guthrie, W. D. (1986b) Recurrent selection for resistance to European corn borer in a corn synthetic and correlated effects on agronomic traits. Crop Sci. 26, 864–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, K. and Kinks, J. L. (1971) Biometrical Genetics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marwaha, K. K., Siddiqui, K. H., Panwar, V. P. S. and Sarup, P. (1980) Screening of “introduction nursery” to identify sources of resistance to the maize stalk borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) under artificial infestation. J. Entomol. Res. 4, 91–96.Google Scholar
Omolo, E. O. (1983) Screening of local and exotic maize lines for stem borer resistance with special reference to Chilo partellus (Swinhoe). Insect Sci. Applic. 4, 105–108.Google Scholar
Panwar, V. P. S. and Sarup, P. (1980) Differential development of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in various maize varieties. J. Entomol. Res. 4, 28–33.Google Scholar
Rowe, K. E. and Alexander, W. L. (1980) Computation for estimating the genetic parameters in joint-scaling tests. Crop Sci. 20, 109–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, W. A., Lawrence, G. D. and Guthrie, W. D. (1979) Effects of recurrent selection for European corn borer resistance on other agronomic characters in synthetic cultivars of maize. Maydica 24, 33–47.Google Scholar
Sarup, P., Siddiqui, K. H., Panwar, V. P. S. and Marwaha, K. K. (1983) Response of diverse maize germplasms to artificial infestation of the stalk-borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe). J. Entomol. Res. 5, 70–75.Google Scholar