Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:53:02.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional Response of the Sevenspotted Lady Beetle, Coccinella Septempunctata Linnaeus on the Mustard Aphid, Lipaphis Erysimi (Kaltenbach)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Omkar  and
Shefali Srivastava
Omkar*
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow Lucknow-226 007, India
Shefali Srivastava
Affiliation:
Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow Lucknow-226 007, India
*
Corresponding author: O. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The functional response of fourth instars, adult males and females of the sevenspotted lady beetle, Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), was studied at different densities of aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) (Homoptera: Aphididae). The maximum prey consumption was recorded for fourth instars at the highest prey density (800) and the minimum for the male lady beetle at the lowest prey density (25). The prey consumption by the predatory stages of the lady beetle was directly and the percent prey consumption inversely proportional to prey density. Prey handling time decreased with increasing prey density. Regression analysis showed a linear relationship between the log number of prey exposed for predation and prey consumed. The predatory efficiency of the predator stages was directly proportional to prey density, indicating a Holling Type II functional response.

Résumé

La réponse fonctionnelle du 4ème stade larvaire et des adultes mâles et femelles de la coccinelle à 7 points, Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), a été étudiée à différentes densités du puceron, Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) (Homoptera: Aphididae). La consommation maximale de proies a été enregistrée pour le 4ème stade larvaire à la densité la plus élevée de proies (800) et la minimale pour les mâles de coccinelle à la plus faible densité de proies (25). La consommation de proies par les différents stades est proportionnelle à la densité de proies alors que le pourcentage de proies consommées est inversement proportionnel. Le temps de manipulation des proies diminue avec l'augmentation de la densité des proies. Un analyse de régression montre une relation linéaire entre le logarithme du nombre de proies présentes et celui du nombre de proies consommées. L'efficacité prédatrice des différents stades est directement proportionnelle à la densité de proies, ce qui indique une réponse fontionnelle d'Holling de type II.

Keywords

Coccinella septempunctataLipaphis erysimiprey densitypredationfunctional responseCoccinella septempunctataLipaphis erysimidensité de proiesprédationréponse fonctionnelle
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2003 , pp. 149 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agarwala, B. K. and Bardhanroy, P. (1997) Oviposition behaviour and reproduction efficiency in ladybird beetles (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera): A case study of Menochilus sexmaculatus (Fabr.). J. Aphidol. 11, 49–59.Google Scholar
Bind, R. B. (1998) Bioecology and behaviour of a ladybird beetle, Cheilomenes (= Menochilus) sexmaculata (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). PhD Thesis. University of Lucknow, Lucknow. 164 pp.Google Scholar
Ghosh, L. K. and Singh, R. (2000) Biodiversity of Indian insects with special reference to aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Aphidol. 14, 113–123.Google Scholar
Hasseil, M. P. (1978) The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey System. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 237 pp.Google Scholar
Hodek, I. and Honek, A. (1996) Ecology of Coccinellidae. Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht Boston London. 464 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nault, L. R. and Bowers, W. S. (1974) Multiple alarm pheromones in aphids. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 17, 455–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofuya, T. I. and Akingbohungbe, A. E. (1988) Functional and numerical responses of Chielomenes. lunata (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) feeding on cowpea aphid, Aphis cracavora Koch (Homoptera: Aphididae). Insect Sci. Applic. 9, 543–546.Google Scholar
Omkar, and Bind, R. B. (1993) Records of aphids-natural enemies complex of Uttar Pradesh. II. The coccinellids. J. Adv. Zool. 14, 96–99.Google Scholar
Omkar, and James, B. E. (2001) predation efficacy of a lady beetle, Coccinella transversalis Fabricius in relation to certain aphids. Biol. Mem. 27, 20–26.Google Scholar
Omkar, and Srivastava, S. (2000) Integrated strategies of insect pest management: An overview. Indian Farmer's Digest 33, 29–34.Google Scholar
Omkar, and Srivastava, S. (2001a) Comparative predatory potential of a ladybird beetle, Coccinella septempunctata Linn. on six prey species. Biol. Mem. 27, 59–63.Google Scholar
Omkar, and Srivastava, S. (2001b) Ovipositional preference of Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus (Coccinellidae: Coleoptera). J. Aphidol. 15, 5–8.Google Scholar
Rhamhalinghan, M. (1987) Feeding behaviour of Coccinella septempunctata L. var. confusa Weidemann (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in relation to temperature-I. Pre-oviposition period. J. Entomol. Res. 11, 178–183.Google Scholar
Sengonca, C. and Liu, B. (1994) Responses of the different instar predator, Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), to the kairomones produced by the prey and non-prey insects as well as the predator itself. Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenschutz 101, 173–177.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1980) Another look at prey detection by coccinellids. Ecol. Entomol. 5, 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suri, S. M., Singh, D. and Brar, K. S. (1988) Estimation of losses in yield of brown Sarson due to aphids in Kangra valley. I, effect of crop growth stage and aphid feeding exposure. Insect Sci. Applic. 1, 162–167.Google Scholar
Waage, J. (1979) Foraging for patchily-distributed hosts by the parasitoid Nemaritis canescens. J. Anim. Ecol. 48, 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagiman, F. X. (1996) Functional response of Menochilus sexmaculatus (Fabricius) against Aphis gossypii. J. Perlindungan Tanaman, Indonesia 2, 38–43.Google Scholar
Wang, J. J. and Tsai, J. H. (2001) Development and functional response of Coelophora inaequalis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) feeding on brown citrus aphid, Toxoptera curiada (Homoptera: Aphididae). Agrie. Forest Entomol. 3, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, M. L. and McPherson, J. H. (1999) Population dynamics of three coccinellids in fluecured tobacco and functional response of Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) feeding on tobacco aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entomol. 28, 768–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zebitz, C. P. W. (1988) Efficiency of coccinellid larvae in dependence from prey distribution. Mitt. Deutsc. Gesellschaft Allgem. Angew. Entomol. 6, 454–457.Google Scholar