Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:47:11.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seed coat colour, tannin content and susceptibility to bruchids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

M. E. Hassan Shazali
M. E. Hassan Shazali
Affiliation:
Grain Storage Research Centre, Shambat Research Station, P. O. Box 30, Khartoum North, Sudan
Get access

Abstract

Five mutants for seed coat colour from the faba bean, Viciafaba L. variety BF 2/2 (Beladi) were tested qualitatively and quantitatively for tannin content. The susceptibility of the mutants to Bruchidius incarnatus (Boh.) and Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) was also evaluated. All seed coats contained tannins (0.75–3.75%). The darker the colour the lower the tannin content. Cotyledons with testas removed were devoid of tannins. The thickness of the seed coats ranged from 0.146–0.155 mm, however, differences among mutants were not significant. Faba seeds were more suitable for the multiplication of B. incarnatus than C. maculatus. The poor performance of the latter was manifested as low fecundity, high mortality and longer developmental period. It was concluded that selection for white coloured faba seeds should not be discouraged on the basis of its assumed susceptibility to bruchids.

Résumé

Cinq variétés de pericarpes de féve, Vicia Faba L. BF 2/2 (Beladi) ont subi des examens tant sur le plant qualitatif que quantitatif pour mesurer leur teneur tannique. La susceptibilité des varietés, Bruchidius incarnatus (Boh.) et Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) estégalement evaluée. Tous les péricarpes contiennent du tannin. Plus le pericarpe est sombre, moins est sa teneur en tannin. Les varietés Detested Cotyledons sont privé du tannin. Le diamétre des pericarpes varie de 0.146 à 0.155 mm, quoique les différences entre les varietés ne sont pas signifiantes. Les graines Faba conviennent pour la multiplication de B. incarnatus mieux que pour le C. maculatus. La maigre performance de ce dernier revient à sa médiocre fecondité, un taux important de mortalité et une période plus longue de maturité pour les graines Faba. Toutefois le devéloppement de ces deux insectes n'est paslouché par Lacouleur du péricarpe on sa teneur en tannin. En conclusion, il est recommandé de ne pas décourager l'option Faba (blanc) sous le prétexte de sa susceptibilité aux bruchidis.

Keywords

Vicia faba (L.)seed coattanninsBruchidius incarnatus (Boh.)Callosobruchus maculatus (F.)damage
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , December 1990 , pp. 855 - 859
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abo-Hegazi, A. M. T., Nassib, A. M. and Ahmed, M. Y. (1978) The association between seed coat colour and brightness of field beans (Vicia faba L.) and resistance to legume beetle. In Proceedings of 4th Con. Pest Control NRC Cairo, pp. 768–778.Google Scholar
Ahmed, A. E. (1985) Sorghum grain tannin content and its effect on performance of growing chicks. M.Sc. thesis, University of Khartoum.Google Scholar
Blessin, C. E., Van Steen, C. H. and Dimlar, R. J. (1963) An examination of anthocyanogens in grain sorghum. Cereal Chem. 40, 241–250.Google Scholar
Bond, D. A. (1976) In vitro digestibility of some faba bean cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54, 413–421.Google Scholar
Booker, R. H. (1967) Observations on three bruchids associated with cowpea in Northern Nigeria. J. Stored Prod. Res. 3, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, R. E. (1971) Method for estimation of tannin in sorghum grain. Agron. J. 63, 511–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, A. and Martin, A. (1968) Variation in tannin content in Vicia faba (L.). J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 106, 377–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chowdhury, K. A. and Buth, G. M. (1970) Seed coat structure and anatomy of Indian pulses. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 63, 169–179.Google Scholar
Gorski, M., Mieczylaw, K. and Jan, B. (1985) Variation in tannin content of faba beans (Viciafaba L.) seedcoats. FABIS 11, 26–28.Google Scholar
Griffiths, D. W. (1983) Some anti-nutritive factors in Viciafaba L. FABIS 6, 1–3.Google Scholar
Griffiths, D. W. (1984) An assessment of the potential for improving the nutritive value of field beans Vicia faba: Progress report. In Vicia faba: Agronomy, Physiology and Breedin (Edited by Hebblethwaite, P. D.), pp. 271–278. The Hague-Boston-Lancaster. Martin Nijhoff/Junk.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, D. W. and Jones, D. J. H. (1977) Cellulose inhibition by tannins in the testa of field beans Viciafaba. J. Sci. Food Agric. 28, 983–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquardt, R. R., Ward, A. T., Campbell, L. D. and Cansfield, P. E. (1977) Purification, identification and characterization of a growth inhibitor in faba beans (Vicia faba L. var. minor). J. Nutr. 107, 1313–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquardt, R. R., Mackirdy, J. A. and Ward, A. T. (1978) Comparative cell wall constituent level of tannin-free and tannin containing cultivars of faba beans (Vicia faba L.). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 58, 775–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulos, C. H., Tsaflaris, A. S. and Roupakias, D. G. (1985) Correlation between tannin content and testa colour in faba beans (Viciafaba L.). FABIS 13, 38–40.Google Scholar
Podoler, H. and Applebaum, W. (1968) Physiological aspects of host specificity in Bruchidae — V. varietal differences in the resistance of Viciafaba L. to Callosobruchus chinensis L. J. Stored Prod. Res. 4, 9—11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M. L., Scoyoc, S. V. and Butler, L. G. (1978) Critical evaluation of vanillin reaction as an assay for tannin in sorghum grain. J. Agric. Fd. Chem. 26, 1214–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, G. G. and Fowler, D. B. (1977) Factors affecting selection for seed coat thickness in faba beans (Vicia faba L.). J. Crop Sci. 17, 88–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shazali, M. E. H. (1986) The biology of Bruchidis incarnatus (Boh.) infesting faba beans (Vicia faba ). Annu. Rep., Shambat Research Station, Khartoum North, Sudan.Google Scholar
Solomon, M. E. (1951) Control of humidity with potassium by droxide, sulphuric acid or other solutions. Bull, entomol. Res. 42, 543–554.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. J. (1958) Systematic notes on species of Callosobruchus of economic importance. Bull, entomol. Res. 48, 79–89.Google Scholar
Southgate, B. J. (1984) Observations on the larval emergence in Callosobruchus chinensis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Entomol. Gener. 9, 177–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, T. (1978) In Biochemical Aspects of Plant and Animal Co-evolution (Edited by Harborne, J. B.), 1–19. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar