Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:02:40.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of the tomato rust mite Aculops lycopersici (Acari: Eriophyidae) on the development and reproduction of three predatory phytoseiid mites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

Faten M. Momen  and
Amira Abdel-Khalek
Faten M. Momen*
Affiliation:
Pests and Plant Protection Department, National Research Centre, 31 El- Tahrir Street, Dokki12622, Cairo, Egypt
Amira Abdel-Khalek
Affiliation:
Pests and Plant Protection Department, National Research Centre, 31 El- Tahrir Street, Dokki12622, Cairo, Egypt
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The biology of Typhlodromips swirskii (Athias-Henriot), Typhlodromus athiasae Porath and Swirski and Paraseiulus talbii (Athias-Henriot) was studied using Aculops lycopersici (Massee) active stages as food source. For T. swirskii, development was faster and reproduction was higher than in T. athiasae. Survival of immatures of P. talbii was low on A. lycopersici and all failed to develop to adulthood. A total of 35.4 and 30.3 eggs per female, respectively, were obtained when T. swirskii and T. athiasae were fed on active stages of the tomato rust mite. A diet of A. lycopersici provided the shortest female longevity and highest mean total fecundity, which resulted in the highest net reproductive rate (Ro = 26.785), intrinsic rate of natural increase (rm = 0.235) and finite rate of increase (λ = 1.265) for T. swirskii. The mean generation time ranged between 13.97 and 17.85 days for T. swirskii and T. athiasae, respectively.

Keywords

AcariAculops lycopersicilife tableParaseiulus talbiiTyphlodromips swirskiiTyphlodromus athiasae
Type
Short Communication
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 53 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abou-Awad, B. A. (1983) Amblyseius gossipi (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) as a predator of the tomato erineum mite, Eriophyes lycopersici (Acari: Eriophyidae). Entomophaga 28, 363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abou-Awad, B. A., El-Sawaf, B. M. and Abdel-Khalek, A. A. (1999) Impact of two eriophyoid fig mites, Aceria ficus and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae, as prey on postembryonic development and oviposition rate of the predacious mite Amblyseius swirskii. Acarologia 40, 367–371.Google Scholar
Abou-Setta, M. M., Sorrell, R. W. and Childers, C. C. (1986) Life 48: a BASIC Computer program to calculate life table parameters for an insect or mite species. Florida Entomologist 69, 690–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, F. S. (1996) Biological and ecological studies on some predacious mesostigmatic mites with special reference to family Phytoseiidae. PhD thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University..Google Scholar
Birch, L. C. (1948) The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. Journal of Animal Ecology 17, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodeur, J., Bouchard, A. and Turcott, G. (1997) Potential of four species of predatory mites as biological control agents of the tomato russet mite, Aculops lycopersici (Massee) (Eriophyidae). Canadian Entomologist 129, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castagnoli, M., Simoni, S. and Liguori, M. (2003) Evaluation of Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as a candidate for the control of Aculops lycopersici (Tryon) (Acari: Eriophyoidea): a preliminary study. Redia 86, 97–100.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A. and McMurtry, J. A. (1994) A review of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Typhlodrominae (Acarina: Phytosiidae). International Journal of Acarology 25, 223–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de-Moraes, G. J. and Lima, H. C. (1983) Biology of Euseius concordis (Chant) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), a predator of the tomato russet mite. Acarologia 24, 251–255.Google Scholar
El-Sawi, S. A. and Momen, F. M. (2005) Biology of some phytoseiid predators (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on eggs of Phthorimaea operculella and Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae and Noctuidae). Acarologia 46, 23–30.Google Scholar
Hessein, N. A. and Perring, T. M. (1986) Feeding habits of the Tydeidae with evidence of Homeopronematus anconai (Acari: Tydeidae) predation on Aculops lycopersici (Acari: Eriophyidae). International Journal of Acarology 12, 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, D. G. (1989) Influence of diet on development, survival and oviposition in an Australian phytoseiid, Amblyseius victoriensis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 6, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawai, A. and Mainual Haque, M. (2004) Population dynamics of tomato russet mite, Aculops lycopersici (Massee) and its natural enemy, Homeopronematus anconai (Baker). Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 38, 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, I. R. (1986) Tomato russet mite: a serious pest of tomatoes. Queensland Agricultural Journal 112, 231–232.Google Scholar
Keifer, H. H., Baker, E. W., Kono, T., Delfinado, M. and Styer, W. E. (1982) An illustrated guide to plant abnormalities caused by eriophyid mites in North America. USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 573, 178 pp.Google Scholar
Momen, F. M. (1999) Feeding behaviour of certain phytoseiid predators on the two spotted spider mite eggs (Acari: Phytoseiidae: Tetranychidae). Phytophaga 9, 85–92.Google Scholar
Momen, F. M. (2008) Life history of the predatory mites Typhlodromus athiasae and Amblyseius cabonus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on two pest mites as prey, with special reference to Eriophyes dioscoridis (Acari: Eriophyidae) Archives of Plant Pathology and Plant Protection (in press).Google Scholar
Momen, F. M. and El-Borolossy, M. (1999) Suitability of the citrus brown mite, Eutetranychus orientalis as prey for nine species of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Tetranychidae: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia 40, 19–23.Google Scholar
Momen, F. M. and El-Sawi, S. A. (1993) Biology and feeding behaviour of the predatory mite, Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia 34, 199–204.Google Scholar
Nomikou, M., Janssen, A., Schraag, R. and Sabelis, M. W. (2001) Phytoseiid predators as potential biological control agents for Bemisia tabaci. Experimental and Applied Acarology 25, 271–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steiner, M. Y., Goodwin, S., Wellham, T. M., Barchia, I. M. and Spohr, L. J. (2003) Biological studies of the Australian predatory mite Typhlodromus lailae (Schicha) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Australian Journal of Entomology 42, 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swirski, E., Amitai, S. and Dorzia, N. (1967) Laboratory studies on the feeding, development and oviposition of the predacious mite Typhlodromus athiasae P. and S. (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on various kinds of food substances. Israel Journal of Agricultural Research 17, 213–218.Google Scholar
Zaher, M. A., El-Borolossy, M. A. and Ali, F. S. (2001) Morphological and biological studies of Typhlodromus talbii Athias-Henriot (Gamasida: Phytoseiidae). Insect Science and Its Application 21, 43–53.Google Scholar