Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:28:43.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of 20 Strains of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner on Larvae of Boarmia selenaria Schiffermüller (Lepidoptera: Geometridae)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

M. Wysoki
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50-250, Israel
M. H. M. Scheepens
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50-250, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Twenty isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner belonging to vars. kenyae, kurstaki, aizawai and ostriniae, were tested for their activity against first instar larvae of Boarmia selenaria Schiffermüller. Isolate 30-11 (serovar 3a3b, kurstaki) proved to be 8% more effective than the standard HD-l-S-1980 (serovar 3a3b, kurstaki). This isolate was 13% more larvicidal to third instar larvae than the standard. Significant lower mortalities than the standard were obtained with the isolates: 400-1, 400-2, 400-3, 400-4, 400-8, 400-11, 400-12, 400-14, 30-2, 30-12, 30-13, 30-15, Ser. 17 and BL8a8c. Isolates 400-5, 400-6, 400-7, 400-9 and 400-10 were similar in larvicidal effectiveness to the standard.

Résumé

Vingt souches de Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner qui appartiennent aux variétés: kenyae, kurstaki, aizawai et ostriniae, ont été testées pour leur activité contre le prémier stade de la larve de Boarmia selenaria Schiffermüller. La souche 30-11 (sérovar 3a3b, kurstaki) s'est avérée être 8% plus effective que le standard HD-l-S-1980 (sérovar 3a3b, kurstaki). Cette souche a été de 13% plus larvicide pour le troisième stade des larves que le standard. Les souches 400-1, 400-2, 400-3, 400-4, 400-8, 400-11, 400-12, 400-14, 30-2, 30-12, 30-13, 30-15, Ser.17 et BL8a8c prouvaient une baisse de mortalité obtenue par rapport au standard. L'effectivité comparable au standard étant de: 400-5, 400-6, 400-7, 400-9 et 400-10.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbott, W. S. (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. econ. Ent. 18, 240245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M., Wysoki, M. and Sneh, B. (1983) The effect of different strains of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner on larvae of the giant looper, Boarmia (Ascotis) selenaria Schiffermüller (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Z. angew. Ent. 96, 6874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duimage, H. T., McLaughlin, R. E., Lacey, L. A., Couch, T. L., Alls, R. T. and Rose, R. I. (1985) HD-968-S-1983, A proposed U.S. standard for bioassays of preparations of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. istaelensis -H-14. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 31, 3134.Google Scholar
Geest, L. P. S. van de and Wassink, H. J. M. (1972) Standardization of Bacillus thuringiensis preparations: A new bioassay method with Pieris brassicae as a test insect. J. invert. Pathol. 19, 361365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izhar, Y., Wysoki, M. and Gur, L. (1979) The effectiveness of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner on Boarmia (Ascotis) selenaria Schiff. (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) in laboratory tests and field trials. Phytoparasitica 7, 6577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarret, P. and Burges, H. D. (1982) Effect of bacterial varieties on the susceptibility of the greater wax moth Galleria mellonella to Bacillus thuringiensis and its significance in classification of bacterium. Ent. exp. appl. 31, 346352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navon, A., Wysoki, M. and Keren, S. (1983) Potency and effect of Bacillus thuringiensis preparations against larvae of Spodoptera littoralis and Boarmia (Ascotis) selenaria. Phytoparasitica 11, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salama, H. S. and Foda, M. S. (1984) Studies on the susceptibility of some cotton pests to various strains of Bacillus thuringiensis. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 91, 6570.Google Scholar
SASR (1985) User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Shorey, W. H. and Hale, L. L. (1965) Mass rearing of nine noctuid species on a simple artificial medium. J. econ. Ent. 58, 522524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swirski, E., Wysoki, M. and Izhar, Y. (1986) The current status of biological and integrated control in the avocado orchards of Israel. Israel Agresearch 1, 3145. (Hebrew, with English summary).Google Scholar
Waikwa, J. W. and Mathenge, W. M. (1977) Field studies on the effects of Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner) on the larvae of the giant coffee looper, Ascotis selenaria reciprocaria, (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) and its side effects on the larval parasites of the leaf miner (Leucoptera spp.). Kenya Coffee 42, 95101.Google Scholar
Wysoki, M. (1982) A bibliography of the giant looper, Boarmia (Ascotis) selenaria Schiffermüiler, 1775 (Lepi-doptera: Geometridae), for the years 1913–1981. Phyto-parasitica 10, 6570.Google Scholar
Wysoki, M. and Izhar, Y. (1986) Fluctuation of the male population of Boarmia (Ascotis) selenaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) estimated by virgin female baited traps, Acta oecol., Oecol. appl. 7, 251259.Google Scholar
Wysoki, M. and Jarvinen, L. (1986) Evaluation of nine strains of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner against the giant looper, Boarmia (Ascotis) selenaria Schiffermüller (Lepi-doptera, Geometridae). Anz. Schadlingsk., PflSchutz, Umweltschutz 59, 7477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wysoki, M., Swirski, E., Izhar, Y. (1981) Biological control of avocado pests in Israel. Prot. Ecol. 3, 2528.Google Scholar