Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:06:35.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecological studies of Glossina austeni Jozani Forest, Unguja Island, Zanzibar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

L. Chuka Madubunyi
L. Chuka Madubunyi
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
Get access

Abstract

In an attempt to overcome the problem of catching Glossina austeni Newstead in reasonable numbers, which hitherto has hindered studies of its ecology in Zanzibar, a new tsetse trap (the Chuka trap) was developed. Its sky-blue coloured version proved superior to the white-and grey-coloured versions, the biconical trap, the Epsilon trap and the 3-dimensional “target” respectively, in catching G. austeni. The Chuka trap helped to establish that G. austen is a very low flyer and most trappable in the “forest floor” biotope of Jozani Forest.

Résumé

Pour surmonter le problème d'attraper Glossina austeni Newstead en nombre assez raisonnable, un problème qui jusq'ici avait retardé l'étude de son écologie au Zanzibar, un nouveau piège pour mouche tsé-tsé, dit Chuka, a été développé. Du point de une efficacité pour attrapper G. austeni, la version bleu ciel s'est révélée supérieure aux versions blanche et grise, piège biconique, piège Epsilon et “Cible” à trois dimensions respectivement. Le piège Chuka a permis de constater que G. austeni vole très bas. Dans la Forêt Jozani G. austeni a été attrappé beaucoup plus dans le biotope du “ras de la forêt”.

Keywords

Glossina austenitrapping devicesJozani ForestZanzibar
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , June 1990 , pp. 309 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Challier, A., Eyraud, M., Lafaye, A. and Laveissière, C. (1977) Amélioration du rendement du piège biconique pour glossines (Diptera: Glossinides) par l'emploi d'un cône inféiieur blue. Cah. ORSTOM Sér. Entomol. Méd. Parasitol. 15, 283–286.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, D. L. (1951) Investigations of Glossina austeni in Zanzibar. EATRO Annu. Rep. 1949. Nairobi, Govt. Printer.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. M. (1986) Trypanosomiasis Control and African Rural Development. Longman, London and New York.Google Scholar
Hall, M. J. R. (1986) A study of methods for the survey of the tsetse, Glossina austeni Newst., on Zanzibar Island. Final Report to the International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Owaga, M. L. A. (1981) Relative efficiency of some mechanical traps used in the study of tsetse species, Glossina pallidipes Austen. Insect Sci. Applic. 1, 197–201.Google Scholar
Schonefeld, A. H. (1988) Pilot trial for the control of Glossina austeni on the Island of Zanzibar. Consultant's Report to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Turner, D. A. (1981) The colonization by the tsetse, Glossina pallidipes Austen, of a unique habitat—exotic coniferous plantation—with special reference to the Lambwe Valley, Kenya. Insect Sci. Applic. 1, 243–248.Google Scholar
Turner, D. A. (1984) The distribution of the tsetse fly, Glossina austeni Newstead, on Zanzibar (Unguja) Island, Republic of Tanzania: A report of a survey carried out between November 1983 and February 1984. International Atomic Energy Agency Report.Google Scholar