Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T13:03:45.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution and larval behaviour of Lampides boeticus in vegetable lablab*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

P.N. Krishna Moorthy
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesseraghatta Lake Post, Bangalore-560 089, India
K. Srinivasan
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesseraghatta Lake Post, Bangalore-560 089, India
Get access

Abstract

The distribution pattern and larval behaviour of the major flower and pod borer Lampides boeticus on vegetable lablab were studied in Bangalore, India. The distribution of eggs and bored flower buds were found to be contagious. Most of the flower buds with pin hole damage had small larva (first and second instar) inside them. Flower buds with medium damage had medium larva (third instar). The flower buds and pods with large damage very rarely harboured larva. The medium and large larvae migrated and caused damage to flower buds and pods. Use of larval behaviour in developing a suitable pest management programme is indicated.

Résumé

Nous a vons étudié à Bangalore la distribution et le comportement des larves de l'insecte perceur Lampides boeticus qui ravage surtout les fleurs et les cosses des haricots légumiers lablab. La distribution des oeufs et des bourgeons percés se trouve contagieuse. La plupart des bourgeons avec des trous d'épingle avaient des petites larves (1er et 2e stades) dedans. Les bourgeons avec des dégâts moyens supportaient des larves de grosseur moyenne (3e stades). Les bourgeons et les cosses avec des grands dégâts abritaient très rarement des larves. Les larves de grosseur moyenne et grande se déplacaient et provoquaient des dégâts considérables aux bourgeons et cosses. Les larves semblaient preferer les bourgeons aux cosses. Sur la base du comportement des larves, nous indiquons des mesures convenables pour arnter les insectes.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anscombe, F.J. (1949) Statistical analysis of insect counts based on the negative binomial distribution. Biometrics 5, 165173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arbous, A.G. and Kerrich, J.E. (1951) Accident statistics and concept of accident proneness. Biometrics 7, 340432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W.G. and Cox, G.M. (1957) Experimental Designs, 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Honda, H., Shinoda, T. and Matsumoto, Y. (1985) Oviposition and larval feeding habits of pea blue, Lampides boeticus L. (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) on lablab bean, Dolichos lablab L. Jap. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 29, 2630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaushik, S.K. and Singh, G. (1982) A short note on the incidence of blue butterfly Lampides boeticus L. (Lycaenidae: Lepidoptera). Indian J. Plant Prot. 10, 94.Google Scholar
Lefroy, H.M. (1909) Indian Insect Life. Thacker Sprink and Company, Calcutta and Simla, India.Google Scholar
Ramachander, P.R. and Rao, G.S.P (1986) Special Statistical Methods in Horticultural Research, Technical Bulletin 1. Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. (1978) Ecological Methods with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar