Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:16:50.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of resistance to endosulphan in populations of the tea mosquito bug Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera: Miridae) from organic and conventional tea plantations in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2010

Somnath Roy ,
Ananda Mukhopadhyay  and
G. Gurusubramanian
Somnath Roy*
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of North Bengal, Siliguri, Darjeeling734 013, India
Ananda Mukhopadhyay
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of North Bengal, Siliguri, Darjeeling734 013, India
G. Gurusubramanian
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Mizoram University, Tanhril, Aizawl796 009, Mizoram, India
*
*E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The tea mosquito bug Helopeltis theivora (Waterhouse) is an important economic pest of tea in India. The development of resistance in H. theivora populations obtained from a conventional plantation and an organic plantation was studied in the laboratory for five generations, and associated changes in life cycle traits were assessed. Selection using sub-lethal concentrations of endosulphan resulted in a 4.4-fold increase in insecticide resistance ratio from the F1 to the F5 generation in the H. theivora population from the conventional plantation. By the F5 generation, nymphal duration was higher and fecundity was lower in the endosulphan-selected strain than in the non-selected strain from a conventional plantation and the susceptible strain from an organic plantation. These findings have practical implications for insecticide resistance management of this important sucking pest of tea.

Keywords

insecticide resistanceendosulphanHelopeltis theivoralife cycleteaIndia
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 61 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbora, B. C. and Biswas, A. K. (1996) Use pattern of pesticides in tea estates of North East India. Two and a Bud 47, 19–21.Google Scholar
Bhatia, S. K. and Pradhan, S. (1968) Studies on resistance to insecticides in Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.). I. Selection of a strain resistant to p, p′ DDT and its biological characteristics. Indian Journal of Entomology 30, 13–32.Google Scholar
Bhatia, S. K. and Pradhan, S. (1971) Studies on resistance to insecticides in Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.) III. Selection of a strain resistant to lindane and its biological characteristics. Journal of Stored Products Research 7, 331–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bora, S., Sarmah, M., Rahaman, A. and Gurusubramanian, G. (2007) Relative toxicity of pyrethroid and non-pyrethroid insecticides against male and female tea mosquito bug Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Darjeeling strain). Journal of Entomological Research 31, 37–41.Google Scholar
Campanhola, C., Mccutchen, B. F., Baehrecke, E. H. and Plapp, F. W. (1991) Biological constraints associated with resistance to pyrethroids in tobacco bud worm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 84, 1404–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzolkhifli, O., Khoo, K. C., Muhamad, R. and Ho, C. T. (1986) Preliminary study of resistance in four populations of Helopeltis theobromae Miller (Hemiptera: Miridae) to g-HCH, propoxur and dioxacarb, pp. 317–323. In Cocoa and Coconuts: Progress and Outlook. Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
FAO (1980) Recommended methods for measurement of pest resistance to pesticides, Plant Production and Protection Paper 21. FAO, Rome. pp. 1–132.Google Scholar
Finney, D. T. (1971) Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press, London. 333 pp.Google Scholar
Forrester, N. M., Cahill, M., Bird, L. G. and Layland, J. K. (1993) Management of pyrethroid and endosulfan resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Australia. Bulletin of Entomological Research 1, 1–32.Google Scholar
Glenn, D. C., Hoffman, A. A. and McDonald, G. (1994) Resistance to pyrethroids in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from corn: adult resistance, larval resistance and fitness effects. Journal of Economic Entomology 87, 1165–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gope, B. and Handique, R. (1991) Bio-ecological studies on the tea mosquito bug Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse in North-East India. Two and a Bud 38, 21–27.Google Scholar
Gurusubramanian, G. and Bora, S.(2007) Relative toxicity of some commonly used insecticides against adults of Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Hemiptera: Miridae) collected from Jorhat area tea plantations, South Assam, India. Resistance Pest Management Newsletter 17, 8–12.Google Scholar
Ho, C. T. (1994) Further investigations on the development of insecticide resistance in Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera: Miridae) from cocoa estates of Peninsular Malaysia. The Planter 70, 207–217.Google Scholar
Kumar, S. and Kumar, J. (1997) Comparative biology of resistant and susceptible strains of Epilachna vigintioctopunctata (F) to malathion and endosulfan. Journal of Entomological Research 21, 303–306.Google Scholar
Leeper, J. R., Rough, R. T. and Reynolds, H. T. (1986) Preventing or managing resistance in arthropods, pp. 345–346. In Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management (edited by Georghiou, G. P.). National Research Council, National Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Liew, V. K., Dzolkhifli, O. and Muhamad, R. (1992) Susceptibility of Helopeltis theobromae Collected from Sg. Tekam to Three Insecticides. Paper presented at: Pesticides in Perspective, pp. 28–29 April 1992. Malaysian Agricultural Chemicals Association, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
Muhamed, R. and Omar, D. (1997) Susceptibility of the cocoa mirid, Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse, to g-HCH, cypermethrin and deltamethrin. Resistance Pest Management Newsletter 9, 34–37.Google Scholar
Price, W. P. (1974) Energy allocation in ephemeral adult insects. The Ohio Journal of Science 74, 380–387.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, S., Sousa, J. P., Nogueira, A. J. and Soares, A. M. V. M. (2001) Effect of endosulfan and parathion on energy reserves and physiological parameters of the terrestrial isopod Porcellio dilatatus. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 49, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robertson, J. L. and Preisler, H. K. (1991) Pesticide Bioassays with Arthropods. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL. 127 pp.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. L., Smith, K. C., Savin, N. E. and Lavigne, R. J. (1984) Effects of dose selection and sample size on the precision of lethal dose estimates in dose–mortality regression. Journal of Economic Entomology 77, 833–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, S., Gurusubramanian, G. and Mukhopadhyay, A. (2008 a) Insecticide persistence and residual toxicity monitoring in tea mosquito bug Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Heteroptera: Hemiptera: Miridae) in Dooars, West Bengal. Resistance Pest Management Newsletter 17, 9–15.Google Scholar
Roy, S., Mukhopadhyay, A. and Gurusubramanian, G. (2008 b) Use pattern of insecticides in tea estates of the Dooars in North Bengal, India. North Bengal University Journal of Animal Science 2, 35–40.Google Scholar
Sarker, M. and Mukhopadhyay, A. (2003) Expression of esterases in different tissues of the tea pest, Helopeltis theivora exposed and unexposed to synthetic pesticide sprays from Darjeeling foothills and plains. Two and a Bud 50, 28–30.Google Scholar
Sarker, M. and Mukhopadhyay, A. (2006 a) Studies on some enzymes related to insecticide resistance in Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae) from Darjeeling foothills and plains. Journal of Plantation Crops 34, 423–428.Google Scholar
Sarker, M. and Mukhopadhyay, A. (2006 b) Studies on salivary and midgut enzymes of a major sucking pest of tea Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera: Miridae) from Darjeeling plains, India. Journal of Entomological Research Society 8, 27–36.Google Scholar
Saxena, J. D. and Bhatia, S. K. (1980) Reduction in fecundity of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.) due to fumigation and phosphine resistance. Indian Journal of Entomology 42, 796–798.Google Scholar
Senapati, B. and Satpathi, J. M. (1981) Comparative biology of malathion and carbaryl resistant and non resistant strains of Epilachna sparsa (Herbst.). Journal of Entomological Research 5, 157–162.Google Scholar
Xia, R. X., Jun, H. Z., Chang, W., Ren, X. X., Han, Z. J. and Wang, Y. C. (2001) Biological fitness of monocrotophos-resistant and susceptible strains of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner). Journal Nanzing Agriculture University 24, 41–44.Google Scholar
Yaqoob, M. and Arora, R. K. (2005) Development of resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) to endosulfan in Jammu and comparative biology of its resistant, parental and susceptible strains. Resistant Pest Management Newsletter 14, 10–13.Google Scholar
Yaqoob, M., Arora, R. K. and Gupta, R. K. (2006) Estimation of resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) to carbaryl and its effect on biology. Resistant Pest Management Newsletter 16, 29–32.Google Scholar
Yamada, K., Tanaka, T., Fahnoy, A. R. and Miyata, T. (1993) Laboratory evaluation of the biological fitness of chlorofluazuron resistant and susceptible strains from the same origin of diamond back moth, Plutella xylostella. Applied Entomology and Zoology 28, 396–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar