Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:41:30.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing a mass-rearing system for Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in north-eastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2014

Raimundo Braga Sobrinho
Raimundo Braga Sobrinho*
Affiliation:
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation – EMBRAPA, Fortaleza City, Ceará, Brazil
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Fruit fly pests in north-eastern Brazil include several species of the genus Anastrepha and the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann). The most common species are Anastrepha zenildae Zucchi, the South American fruit fly Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann), the West Indian fruit fly Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart) and Anastrepha sororcula Zucchi. In this study, attempts were made to mass-rear A. zenildae and A. fraterculus. The objective was to adapt local populations to laboratory conditions and develop mass-rearing systems for further utilization in integrated area-wide control programmes. Small colonies initially fed on guava fruits were developed in the laboratory. Adults were fed a diet made of brown sugar (60%), hydrolysed corn protein (26%), brewer's yeast (5%) and honey (9%). Adult diets with other combinations of ingredients were also tested. The colonies of A. zenildae and A. fraterculus achieved mating and egg hatch rates of 32 and 39%, respectively. The best diets for adults, resulting in good egg hatch, were as follows: diet B – brown sugar (60%), hydrolysed corn protein (26%), brewer's yeast (5%) and honey (5%); diet C – hydrolysed corn protein and white sugar (1:3); and diet D – soybean protein and white sugar (1:3). The best larval diet was based on 18% sugarcane bagasse and 9% protein. Adult mortality during the first 15 days was still high, over 50%. Adult recovery from pupae was over 70%. The best oviposition substrate was an agar-coated glass bottle. Mating compatibility was highest for A. fraterculus from the state of São Paulo. Mating between A. fraterculus and A. zenildae yielded no viable eggs.

Keywords

Anastrepha fraterculusAnastrepha zenildaeSouth American fruit flyBrazilrearingdiet
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 34 , Issue S1 , November 2014 , pp. S66 - S72
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Braga Sobrinho, R., Caceres, C., Islam, A., Wornoayporn, V. and Enkerlin, W. (2006) Improving mass rearing technology for South American fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Revista Caatinga 19, 310–316.Google Scholar
FAO/IAEA/USDA (2003) Product quality control and shipping procedures for sterile mass-reared tephritid fruit flies. Joint FAO/IAEA Programme of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture. Manual, Version 5.0. IAEA, Vienna, Austria. 85 pp. Available at:http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/ipc/public/ipc-mass-reared-tephritid.html.Google Scholar
Salles, L. A. B. (1992) Metodologia de creação de Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied., 1830) (Diptera: Tephritidae) em dieta artificial em laboratório. Anais Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia 21, 479–486.Google Scholar
Tanaka, N., Steiner, L. F., Ohinata, K. and Okamoto, R. (1969) Low-cost larval rearing medium for mass production of oriental and mediterranean fruit flies. Journal of Economic Entomology 62, 967–968.Google Scholar
Zucchi, R. A. (1978) Novas espécies de Anastrepha Schiner 1898 (Diptera: Tephritidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 23, 115–118.Google Scholar

Supporting references

Backer, A. C., Stone, W. E., Plummer, C. C. and McPhail, M. (1944) A Review of Studies on the Mexican Fruit Flies and Related Mexican Species. Miscellaneous Publication 531. USDA, Washington, District of Columbia. 155 pp.Google Scholar
Braga Sobrinho, R., Mesquita, A. L. M., Enkerlin, W., Guimaraes, J. A., Bandeira, C. T. and Peixoto, M. J. A. (2004) Evaluation of fruit fly attractant in the state of Ceará – Brazil. Ciência Agronômica 35, 253–258.Google Scholar
Braga Sobrinho, R., Caceres, C., Islam, A., Wornoayporn, V. and Enkerlin, W. (2006) Diets based on soybean protein for Mediterranean fruit fly. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 41, 705–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Souza, D. R. and do Nascimento, A. S. (1999) Controle de Moscas das Frutas. Embrapa-Mandioca e Fruticultura, Cruz das Almas, BA. 10 pp.Google Scholar
Kovaleski, A., Ribeiro, L. G., Nora, I. and Humeres, E. (1995) Determinação da Eficiência de Atrativos Alimentares na Captura de Moscas-das-frutas Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied. 1830) (Diptera: Tephritidae) em Macieira no RS e SC. Resumos 15°. Congresso Brasileiro de Entomologia, Caxambu, MG. 606 pp.Google Scholar
Kovaleski, A., Sugayama, R. and Malavasi, A. (1999) Movement of Anastrepha fraterculus from native breeding sites into apple orchards in southern Brazil. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 91, 459–465.Google Scholar
Kovaleski, A., Sugayama, R. L. and Malavasi, A. (2000) Current status and perspectives for management of Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.) in apple orchards in Brazil, pp. 595–599. In Area-Wide Control of Fruit Flies and Other Insect Pests (edited by Tan, K. H.). Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.Google Scholar
Liquido, N. J., Shinoda, L. A. and Cunningham, R. T. (1991) Host Plants of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae): an Annotated World Review. Miscellaneous Publication 77. Entomological Society of America, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Norrbom, A. L. and Kim, K. C. (1988) A List of the Reported Host Plants of the Species of Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae). APHIS 81–52. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, District of Columbia.Google Scholar
Salles, L. A. B. (1990) Moscas das Frutas, Anastrepha fraterculus (Wied.). Bioecologia e Controle. Documento 41. EMBRAPA-CNPFT, Pelotas. 61 pp.Google Scholar
Sugayama, R. L., Branco, E. S., Malavasi, A., Kovaleski, A. and Nora, I. (1997) Oviposition behavior of Anastrepha fraterculus in apple and diel pattern of activities in an apple orchard in Brazil. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 83, 239–245.Google Scholar
Vargas, R. I. and Carey, J. R. (1989) Comparison of demographic parameters for wild and laboratory-adapted Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 82, 55–59.Google Scholar
Walder, J. M. M. (1988) Controle genético de moscas das frutas. In Moscas das Frutas no Brazil (edited by de Souza, H. M. L.). Fundação Cargil, Campinas, SP.Google Scholar
Zucchi, R. A. (1988) Moscas das frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) no Brasil: Taxonomia, distribuição geográfica e hospedeiros, pp. 1–8. In Moscas das Frutas no Brasil (edited by de Souza, H. M. L.). Fundação Cargill. I Encontro sobre moscas das frutas, Anais. Campinas, SP.Google Scholar
Zucchi, R. A. (2000) A checklist of the species of Anastrepha with the families of their host plants and Hymenopteran parasitoids in Brazil, pp. 693–702. In Area-Wide Control of Fruit Flies and Other Insect Pests (edited by Tan, K. H.). Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.Google Scholar