Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:58:22.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of different materials as Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) oviposition substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

Vanit Kathuria  and
Nutan Kaushik
Vanit Kathuria
Affiliation:
Bioresources and Biotechnology Division, TERI, Habitat Place, Lodhi Road, New Delhi, 110 003, India
Nutan Kaushik*
Affiliation:
Bioresources and Biotechnology Division, TERI, Habitat Place, Lodhi Road, New Delhi, 110 003, India
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In studies aimed at optimizing the substrate for rearing Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) under laboratory conditions, the noctuid's oviposition behaviour was studied in the laboratory using pigeonpea leaves, muslin cloth, tissue paper and cotton wool as oviposition substrates in free-choice and no-choice tests. Egg counts revealed the moth's preference for oviposition substrate, in descending order, to be cotton wool, pigeonpea leaves, tissue paper and muslin cloth. The preference index of cotton wool was 65% higher than the least preferred substrate, muslin cloth. A total of 300 eggs per female were laid in the free-choice tests, while 200 were laid in the no-choice assays.

Keywords

cotton bollwormHelicoverpa armigeraoviposition substratemass rearing
Type
Short Communication
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , December 2004 , pp. 336 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chaudhari, S. V. (2000) Parasitism by Senometopia illota Curran (Diptera: Tachinidae) on Helicoverpa armigera Hübner in pigeonpea and chickpea. Indian J. Plant Prot. 28, 218–219.Google Scholar
Cullen, J. M. (1969) The reproduction and survival of Heliothis punctigera Wallengren in South Australia. PhD thesis, University of Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
DengMing, P., Yan, M. & HaiQing, J. (2000) An experiment on the application of 48% spinosad solution for the control of bollworm. China Cottons 28, 15–16.Google Scholar
Dethier, V. G. (1971) A surfeit of stimuli: a paucity of receptors. Am. Sci. 59, 706–715.Google Scholar
Firempong, S. & Zalucki, M. P. (1990) Host plant selection by Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): role of certain plant attributes. Aus. J. Zool. 37, 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ge, F., Liu, X., Ding, Y., Wang, X. & Zhao, Y. (2003) Life table of Helicoverpa armigera in northern China and characters of population development in southern and northern China. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 14, 241–245.Google ScholarPubMed
Gunning, R. (2002) Heliothis insecticide resistance continues to climb. Aus. Cottongrower 23, 71–72.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. M., Severnson, R. F., Johnson, A. W., Chaplin, J. F. & Stephenson, M. G. (1984) Ovipositional response of tobacco budworm moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to cuticular chemical isolates from green tobacco leaves. Environ. Entomol. 13, 1023–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jadhav, D. R. & Armes, N. J. (1996) Comparative status of insecticide resistance in the Helicoverpa and Heliothis species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) of South India. Bull. Entomol. Res. 86, 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jallow, M. F. A., Zalucki, M. P. & Fitt, G. P. (1999) Role of chemical cues from cotton in mediating host selection and oviposition behaviour in Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Aus. J. Ent. 38, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. W., Stinner, R. E. & Rabb, R. L. (1975) Ovipositional response of Heliothis zea (Boddie) to its major hosts in North Carolina. Environ. Entomol. 4, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, M. (1977) The role of chemical factors in insect/plant relationships, pp. 211–227. In Proceedings of XV International Congress of Entomology, 19–27 August 1976, Washington D.C. (Edited by Packer, J. & White, D.). 1976. Entomological Society of America, College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar
Miller, J. R. & Strickler, K. L. (1984) Plant herbivore relationships: finding and accepting host plants, pp. 127–157. In Chemical Ecology of Insects (Edited by Bell, W. J. & Carde, R. T.). Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagarkatti, S. & Prakash, H. (1974) Rearing Heliothis armigera (Hubn) on an artificial diet. Tech. Bull. Commonwealth Inst. Biol. Contr. 17, 169–173.Google Scholar
Navasero, R. C. & Ramaswamy, S. B. (1991) Morphology of leaf surface trichomes and its influence on egglaying by Heliothis virescens. Crop Sci. 31, 342–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pourmirza, A. A. (2000) Relationship between nuclear polyhedrosis virus susceptibility and larval weight in Heliothis armigera. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2, 291–298.Google Scholar
Ramaswamy, S. B. (1988) Host finding by moths: sensory modalities and behaviours. J. Insect Physiol. 34, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, C. G. V. & Bhattacharya, A. K. (1990) Development of semi-synthetic diets for the rearing of Heliothis armigera (Hub.). J. Insect Sci. 3, 23–33.Google Scholar
Reed, W. & Pawar, C. S. (1982) Heliothis: a global problem, pp. 9–14. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Heliothis Management 15–20 Nov 1981, ICRISAT Center, Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India (Edited by Reed, W.). International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics 428 pp.Google Scholar
Renwick, J. A. A. & Radke, C. D. (1985) Constituents of host and non-host plants deterring oviposition by the cabbage butterfly, Pieris rapae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 39, 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanower, T. G., Yoshida, M. & Peter, A. J. (1997) Survival, growth, fecundity and behavior of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on pigeonpea and two wild Cajanus species. J. Econ. Entomol. 90, 837–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, K. & Fujisaki, K. (2002) Sexual differences in diapause induction of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hb.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 37, 527–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, A. K. & Rembold, H. (1992) Maintenance of the cotton bollworm, Heliothis armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in laboratory culture - I. Rearing on semi-synthetic diet. Insect Sci. Applic. 13, 333–338.Google Scholar
Teakle, R. E. (1993) Laboratory culture of Heliothis species and identification of disease, pp. 22–29. In Heliothis: Research Methods and Prospects (Edited by Zalucki, M. P.). Springer-Verlag, London.Google Scholar
Teakle, R. E. & Jensen, J. M. (1985) Rearing Heliothis punctigera, pp. 313–322. In Handbook of Insect Rearing (Edited by Singh, P. & Moore, R. F.). Vol. 2. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
Tripathi, S. R. & Singh, R. (1989) Effect of different pulses on development, growth and reproduction of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insect Sci. Applic. 10, 145–148.Google Scholar
Wu, K. J. (1985) A lucerne-wheat germ diet for rearing the cotton bollworm, Heliothis armigera (Hübner). Acta Entomol. Sinica 23, 22–29.Google Scholar