Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:52:16.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attractiveness of some food baits to the melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

T. Elaiya Bharathi ,
V.KR. Sathiyanandam  and
P.M.M. David
T. Elaiya Bharathi*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Entomology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Killikulam, Vallanad, 628 252, Tamil Nadu, India
V.KR. Sathiyanandam
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Entomology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Killikulam, Vallanad, 628 252, Tamil Nadu, India
P.M.M. David
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Entomology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Killikulam, Vallanad, 628 252, Tamil Nadu, India
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The attraction of the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coq.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) to soybean hydrolysate, fishmeal, beef extract, banana/grapes, bread and dog biscuit was evaluated in snakegourd (Trichosanthes anguina L.) gardens during 2000–2001. Vinegar and beer were added as the ‘bait components’ to the above ‘base baits’ to enhance their attractiveness. Edible oils, glycerine and petroleum jelly were tested as the ‘controlled releasers’ to sustain the attractiveness. The results indicated that banana and soybean hydrolysate were 85–95% more attractive to adult B. cucurbitae than fishmeal, beef extract, bread and dog biscuit. Among the fruit pulps, grapes and banana appeared to be more attractive than pineapple. The attractiveness of baits with palm oil lasted longer (up to 5 days) than that of baits without any controlled releaser (2–3 days). Grapes + beer + palm oil was found to be 37% more attractive than the other admixtures. The fruit flies were attracted towards the baits more intensively between 0600 and 0800 h and between 1600 and 1800 h.

Keywords

Bactrocera cucurbitaefood attractantsattractiveness
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 125 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angioy, A. M., Liscia, A. and Pertra, P. (1978) The electrophysiological response of labellar and tarsal hairs of Dacus oleae to salt and sugar stimulation. Boll. Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 51, 2115–2121.Google Scholar
Barrows, W. M. (1907) The reactions of the pomace fly, Drosophila ampelophila Loew. to odorous substances. J. Exp. Zool., 4, 515–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, M. A., Insunza, V. and Aretz, P. (1973) The eradication of the Queensland fruit fly from Easter Island. FAO Plant Prot. Bull., 21, 114Google Scholar
Beroza, M., Alexander, B. H., Steiner, L. F., Mitchell, W. C. and Miyashita, D. H. (1960) New synthetic lure for the male melon fly. Science, 131, 1044–1045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bose, T. K. and Mitra, S. K. (1990) Fruits: Tropical and Subtropical Naya Prakash, Calcutta, India. 838 pp.Google Scholar
Chambers, D. L. (1977) Attractants for fruit fly survey and control pp. 327–344. In Chemical Control of Insect Behaviour (Edited by Shorey, H. H. and McKelvey, J. J.). Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Cornelius, M. L., Duah, J. J. and Messing, R. H. (1999) Capture of Oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) by protein baited traps and fruit-mimicking visual traps in a guava orchard. Environ. Entomol., 28, 1140–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, R. T. (1989) Parapheromones, pp. 221–230. In Fruit Flies: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control (Edited by Robinson, A. S. and Hooper, G.). vol 3A. Amsterdam Elsevier.Google Scholar
Daane, K. M., Dahlsten, D. L. and Dreistadt, S. H. (1990) Effects of Mediterranean fruit fly malathion bait spray on the longevity and oviposition of parasitoids of linden and tulip tree aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entomol., 19, 1130–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, B. S. and Kitching, W. (1995) Chemistry of fruit flies. Chem. Rev., 95, 789–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazit, Y., Nancy, Y. and Epsky, D. (1998) Trapping females of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Israel: comparison of lures and trap type. J. Econ. Entomol., 91, 1335–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gow, P. A. (1954) Proteinaceous bait for the oriental fruit fly. J. Econ. Entomol., 47, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, J. B. and Dahlsten, D. L. (1984) Effects of malathion and Staley's bait on the behaviour and survival of parasitic Hymenoptera. Environ. Entomol., 13, 1483–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, E. B. and Light, D. M. (1996) Olfactory semiochemicals of tephritids, 73–90. In Fruit Fly Pest: A World Assessment of their Biology and Management (Edited by McPheron, B. A. and Steck, G. J.) St. Lucie Press, Florida.Google Scholar
Kapoor, V. C. (1993) Indian Fruit Flies (Insecta: Diptera: Tephritidae) Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi. 228 pp.Google Scholar
Kinney, R. (1993) Florida commens regarding fruit fly research, in Fruit Flies: Biology and Management (Edited by Aluja, M. and Liedo, P.) Springler- Verlag, New York. 492 pp.Google Scholar
Koyama, J., Teruya, T. and Tanaka, K. (1984) Eradication of the oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) from the Okinawa Islands by a male annihilating method. J. Econ. Entomol., 77, 468–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuba, H. (1991) Sex pheromones and mating behaviour of Dacinae, 223–232. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Biology and Control of Fruit Flies, held at Ginowan, Okinawa, Japan, 2–4 September (Edited by KawasakiK, O. Iwahashi and Kaneshiko, K. Y).Google Scholar
Lall, H. and Singh, S. (1969) Studies on the biology and control of melon fly Dacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Sci. Tech., 7, 148–153.Google Scholar
Landolt, P. J. and Heath, R. R. (1996) Development of pheromone based trapping systems for monitoring and controlling tephritid fruit flies in Florida, 197–207. In Pest Management in the Subtropics: Integrated Pest Management—A Florida Perspective (Edited by Rosen,, D., Bennett,, F. D., Capinera,, J. L). Intercept Ltd. Andover, UK.Google Scholar
Landolt, P. I. and Averill, A. L. (1999) Fruit flies, 3–25. In Pheromones of Non-Lepidoptern Insects Associated with Agricultural Plants (Edited by Hardie,, J. and Minles,, A. K.). CABI publishing. New York.Google Scholar
Langford, G. S., Johnson, W. T. and Harding, W. C. (1954) Bait studies for fly control. J. Econ. Entomol., 47, 438–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhail, M. (1937) Relation of time of day, temperature, and evaporation to attractiveness of fermenting sugar solution to Mexican fruit fly. J. Econ. Entomol., 30, 793–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, R. L. (1990) Chemical ecology of Dacinae fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 83, 1017–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, T. C. and Bateman, M. A. (1981) Chemical studies of proteinaceous attractant for fruit flies, including the identification of volatile constituents. Austr. J. Agr. Res., 32, 905–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, J. L. (1977) Pheromone research in tephritid fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 2, 481–485.Google Scholar
Pawar, C., Sithanantham, S., Sharma, H. C., Taneja, S. L., Amin, P. W., Leuschner, K. and Reed, W. (1984) Use and development of insect traps at ICRISAT, In: Use of Traps for Pest/Vector Research and Control. Proc. Nat. Seminar, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidhyalaya, West Bengall174 pp.Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1993) The 1989/1990 Mediterranean fruit fly eradication program in California, 492–497. In Fruit Fies: Biology and Management (Edited by Aluja, M. and Liedo, P.) Springler-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. (1975) Oviposition-deterring fruit marking pheromone in Rhagoletis fausta. Environ. Entomol., 4, 298–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. and Roitberg, B. D. (1992) Fruit fly foraging behaviour, pp. 293–306. In Fruit Flies: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control (Edited by Robinson,, A. S. and Hooper,, G.) Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R. J., Papaj, D. R., Hendrichs, J., Wong, T.T.Y. (1992) Behavioral responses of Ceratitis capitata flies to bait spray droplets and natural food. Entomol. Exp. Appl., 64, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J., Hsu, C. L. and Vargas, R. I. (1993) Effect of source and condition of animal excrement on attractiveness to adults of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Taphritidae). Environ. Entomol., 22, 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putruele, G., Abbiati, N. N. and Yaccaro, N. C. (1993) Soybean protein hydrolysate bait for medfly control, 369–373. In Fruit Flies: Biology and Management (Edited by Aluja,, M. and Liedo, P.) Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quereshi, Z. A., Bughio, A. R. and Siddiqui, Q. H. (1981) Population suppression of fruit fly Dacus zonatus (Saunders) (Diptera: Tephritidae) by male annihilation technique and its impact on fruit infestation. J. Appl. Entomol., 91, 521–524.Google Scholar
Reed, M. R. (1938) The olfactory responses of Drosophila melanogaster Meigen to the products of fermenting banana. Physiol. Zool., 11, 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, L. B. and Hepburn, G. A. (1929) Studies on reaction of the Natal fruit fly to fermenting baits. Union. State Dept. Agr. Ent. Mem., 8, 19–53.Google Scholar
Robinson, A. S. and Hooper, G. (1989) World Crop Pests, Fruit Flies, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. vol 3A. Elsevier, New York, 372 pp.Google Scholar
Sankaram, A. (1999) Integrated pest management: Looking back and forward. Curr. Sci., 77, 26–32.Google Scholar
Sharp, J. L. and Chambers, D. L. (1983) Aggregation response of Anastrepha suspensa to proteins and amino acids. Environ. Entomol., 12, 923–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, J. L. and Chambers, D. L. (1984) Consumption of carbohydrates, proteins and amino acids by Anastrepha suspensa in the laboratory. Environ. Entomol., 13, 768–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivinski, J. M. and Calkins, C. O. (1986) Pheromones and parapheromones in the control of tephritids. Florida Entomologist, 73, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soundar Rajan, K., Dhandapani, N. and Chezhiyan, N. (1996) A low cost technology to control fruit fly Dacus cucurbitae of chow-chow. Pestology, 20, 15–16.Google Scholar
Steiner, L. F. (1952a) Methyl eugenol as an attractant for oriental fruit fly. J. Econ. Entomol., 45, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, L. F. (1952b) Fruit fly control in Hawaii with poison bait sprays containing protein hydrolysates. J. Econ. Entomol., 45, 838–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, L. F., Mitchell, W. and Ohinata, K. (1958) Fruit fly control with poisoned-bait sprays in Hawaii USDA. Agric. Res. Service 1–4.Google Scholar
Steiner, L. F., Rohwer, G. G., Ayers, E. L. and Christenson, L. D. (1961) The role of attractants in the recent Mediterranean fruit fly eradication program in Florida. J. Econ. Entomol., 54, 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, L. F., Mitchell, W. C., Harris, E. J., Kozuma, T. T. and Fujimoto, M. S. (1965) Oriental fruit fly eradication by male annihilation. J. Econ. Entomol., 58, 961–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taneja, S. L., Reddy, K.V.S. and Leuschner, K. (1986) Monitoring of shoot fly population in sorghum. Indian J. Pl. Prot., 14, 29–36.Google Scholar
Tsitsipis, J. A. (1989) Nutrition requirements, pp. 103–116. In World Crop Pests, Fruit Flies: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control (Edited by Robinson, A. S. and Hooper, G.) vol 3A. Elsevier Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vargas, R. I., Stark, J. P. and Nishida, T. (1989) Abundance, distribution and dispersion indices of the oriental fruit fly and melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) on Kauai, Hawaiian Islands. J. Econ. Entomol., 82, 1609–1615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vijaysegaran, S. (1993) Control of fruit flies in tropical regions of Asia. In Fruit Flies: Biology and Management (Edited by Aluja, M. and Liedo, P). Springler-Verlag New York492 pp.Google Scholar