Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T12:25:54.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Susceptibility of Egyptian Culex pipiens L. to six synthetic pyrethroids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

I. A. Gaaboub  and
T. A. Abu-Hashish
I. A. Gaaboub
Affiliation:
Entomology Division, Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
T. A. Abu-Hashish
Affiliation:
Entomology Division, Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
Get access

Abstract

The effect of six pyrethroids, NRDC 104 (resmethrin), NRDC 107 (bioresmethrin), NRDC 119 (cismethrin), NRDC 143 (permethrin), NRDC 156 and allethrin, against larvae and adults of the Egyptian mosquito Culex pipiens L. has been evaluated. Five strains were used, a field strain and DDT-susceptible, DDT-resistant, malathion-susceptible and malathion-resistant strains. Results obtained were also referred to a DDT highly susceptible strain of another mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.)

The toxicity curves showed that NRDC 156 proved to be the most effective compound tested, followed by NRDC 143, NRDC 119, NRDC 107 and NRDC 104, respectively, while allethrin was the least effective. Such a fact was highly pronounced either on the LC50 or on the LC95 basis.

As larvicides, data obtained proved that the DDT-susceptible strain was less susceptible to all the tested pyrethroids than the DDT-resistant strain by about 42.6-, 5.1-, 8.6-, 132-, 290.7- and 4.8-fold in the case of NRDC 104, 107, 199, 143, and 156 and allethrin, respectively. Tests also showed that there is no definite variation in susceptibility of both malathion-susceptible and malathion-resistant strains, except in the case of NRDC 143 and 156. Comparing tests against larvae of A. aegypti confirmed that the susceptibility to these pyrethroids was closely correlated with insect species and its strain, and cross-resistance might be developed among larvae of these species.

As adulticides, the pyrethroids used could be arranged in the following descending order according to their LC50 values: NRDC 156, NRDC 143, NRDC 104, allethrin, NRDC 107 and NRDC 119. The change in the trend of toxicity is possible due to the stage tested and the mode of action of these compounds on adult or larval stage.

Keywords

Culex pipiensAedes aegyptipyrethroidssusceptibility statuslethal concentrationslarval testsadult tests
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 1981 , pp. 297 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cawley, H. M., Sullivan, W. N., Schechtor, M. S. and McGuire, J. U. (1974) Desirability of three synthetic pyrethroid aerosols for aircraft disinsection. World Health Organization/Vector Biology and Control Document 1509, 74.Google Scholar
Elliott, M. (1970) The relationship between the structure and the activity of pyrethroids. Bull. Wld. Hlth Org. 44, 315–324.Google Scholar
Elliott, M. and Janes, N. F. (1969) Pyrethrin II and related esters obtained by reconstitution. Chem. Ind. 270–271.Google Scholar
Elliott, M., Janes, N. F., Jeffes, K. A., Needham, P. H. and Sawichi, R. M. (1965) Nature 207, 938–940 (cf. ELLIOTT et al. 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, M., Farnham, A. W., Janes, N. F., Needham, P. H. and Pearson, B. C. (1967) 5-Benzyl-3-furylmethyl chrysanthemate, a new potent insecticide. Nature 213, 493–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, M., Janes, N. F., Casida, J. E. and Kimmel, E. C. (1972) Mammalian metabolites of pyrethroids. Pyrethrum Post 11(3), 1–10.Google Scholar
Elliott, M., Farnham, A. W., Janes, N. F., Needham, P. H., Pulman, D. A. and Stevenson, J. H. (1973a) NRDC 143, a more stable pyrethroid. In Proceedings 1th British Insecticide and Fungicide Conference, pp. 721–728.Google Scholar
Elliott, M., Farnham, A. W., Janes, N. F., Needham, P. H., Pulman, D. A. and Stevenson, J. H. (1973b) Potent pyrethroid insecticides from modified cyclopropane acids. Nature 244, 456–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliott, M., Farnham, A. W., Janes, N. F., Needham, P. H., Pulman, D. A. and Stevenson, J. H. (1973C) A photostable pyrethroid. Nature 246, 169–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliott, M., Farnham, A. W., Janes, N. F., Needham, P. H., Pulman, D. A. and Stevenson, J. H. (1973d) Synthetic insecticides with a new order of activity. Nature 248, 5450, 710–711.Google Scholar
Elliott, M., Janes, N. P. and Pulman, D. A. (1974a) The pyrethrins and related compounds. Cyclopropan-car-boxylates with new unsaturated 3-substituents. J. Chem. Soc. Perkins Trans. 1, 2470–2474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, M., Farnham, A. W., Janes, N. F., Needham, P. H. and Pulman, D. A. (1974b) Insecticidally active conformations of pyrethroids. ACS Symposium Series No. 2, Mechanism of Pesticide Action, pp. 80–91. American Chemical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, M., Janes, N. F. and Graham Bryce, I. J. (1975) Retrospect on the discovery of a new insecticide. In Proceedings of ith British Insecticide-Fungicide Conference, pp. 373–379.Google Scholar
Gaaboub, I. A. and Busvine, J. R. (1975) DDT-resistance status and the effects of DDT exposure in relation to the vectorial capacity of Aedes aegypti (L.) for Brugia pahangi (Buckley & Edeson). Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 69(4), 493–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gad, A. M. and Salit, A. M. (1972) The mosquitoes of the Red Sea area, Egypt. J. med. Ent. 6, 581–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, S. and Bernard, W. (1955) Some observations on the bionomics of mosquitoes of the Nile Delta. Report NM 005050, 42, 06 Cairo, NAMRU 3,5,15.Google Scholar
Khalil, M., Halawani, A. and Hilmi, I. S. (1930) The transmission of Bancroftian filariasis in Egypt. J. Egypt, med. Assoc. 15, 317–332.Google Scholar
Laforge, F. B. (1947) J. Am. Chem. Soc. (cf. NISHIZAWA 1971).Google Scholar
Litchfield, J. T. and Wilcoxon, F. (1949) A simplified method of evaluating dose-effect experiments. J. Pharmacol. exp. Therap. 96, 99–113.Google ScholarPubMed
Nishizawa, Y. (1971) Development of new synthetic pyrethroids. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 44, 325–326.Google ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, W. N., Hewing, A. N., Schechter, M. S., McGuire, J. U., Waters, R. M. and Field, E. S. (1972) Further studies of aircraft dis-insection and odour characteristics of aerosols containing resmethrin and d-trons-resmethrin. World Health Organization/Vector Biology and Control Document 393, 11.Google Scholar
Sutherland, D. J., Beam, F. D. and Gupta, A. P. (1967) The effects of sub-lethal exposure to insecticides, DDT-diel-drin, malathion and the basal follicles of Aedes aegypti (L.). Mosquito News 27, 316–323.Google Scholar
WHO (1963) World Health Organization Expert Committee on Insecticides, Ser. No. 265, 1963.Google Scholar