Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T08:50:44.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resistance of barley varieties to barley fly Delia flavibasis Stein (Diptera: Anthomyiidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

M. Macharia  and
J. M. Mueke
M. Macharia
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Station, P.O. Njoro, Kenya
J. M. Mueke
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Station, P.O. Njoro, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

Five barley varieties, viz. Proctor, Kenya Research, Tumaini, MPYT 169-2Y and Can B35/2, were tested in the field to evaluate their resistance traits to D. flavibasis. Can B35/2 was identified as a moderately resistant variety useful for reference in further work. The varieties were observed to recover their growth after the infestation. Visual growth recovery scores in the field experiments suggested the tolerance type of resistance.

Résumé

Cinq variétés d'orge, á savoir, la Proctor, la Kenya Research, la Tumaini, la MPYT 169-2Y et la Can B35/2 furent testés sur le terrain pour évaluer leurs résistances au D. flavibasis. La Can B35/2 a été identifiee come la variété modérément résistante, référence utile pour des travaux ultérieurs. On a observé que les variétés regagnaient leurs croissances après l'invasion de parasites. Les mesurages visuels de guérison dans les expériences sur le terrain ont suggéré une sorte de tolérance.

Keywords

Barley flyresistancecompensatory growth
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , February 1986 , pp. 75 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bardner, R. and Griffiths, D. C. (1967) Recovery of wheat plants from damage by wheat bulb fly larvae. Report from the Rothamstead Experimental Station 1966, pp. 182–183.Google Scholar
Bardner, R. and Fletcher, K. E. (1974) Insect infestation and their effect on growth and yield of field crops: a review. Bull. ent. Res. 64, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boswinkle, E. (1955) Annual Report 1954. Department of Agriculture, Kenya, Vol. 2, pp. 225–226.Google Scholar
Bullock, J. A. (1964) The control of Hylemya arambourgi Seg. (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) on barley. Bull. ent. Res. 55, 645–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, N. (1925) Studies on Oscinella frit Linn. A preliminary investigation of the extent of the recovery power of oats when subject to injury. Ann. appl. Biol. 12, 276–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lima, C. P. F. (1976) A guide to the biology and control of pests of field crops and stored produce in Kenya. Ministry of Agriculture, Republic of Kenya.Google Scholar
Graham, J. F. (1955) Annual Report 1954. Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya, Vol. 2, p. 5.Google Scholar
Le Pelley, R. H. (1954) Annual Report 1953. Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya, Vol. 2, p. 10.Google Scholar
Little, T. M. and Hills, F. J. (1975) Statistical Methods in Agricultural Research. University of California Press, Davis.Google Scholar
Luginbill, P. Jr (1969) Developing resistant plants, the ideal method of controlling insects. U.S. Dept of Agric. Prod. Res. Vol. III.Google Scholar
Painter, R. H. (1951) Insect Resistance in Plants. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. and Konzak, C. F. (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar