Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:20:34.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Potential use of Sesbania pachycarpa (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) as a refugia for the legume pod borer Marucavitrata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2011

Ibrahim Baoua
Affiliation:
Intitut de Recherches Agronomique du Niger (INRAN), Maradi, Niger
Niango Malick Ba*
Affiliation:
Institut de l'Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), Station de Kamboinsé, 01 BP 476, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso
Tolulope A. Agunbiade
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
Venu Margam
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Clémentine L. Binso-Dabiré
Affiliation:
Institut de l'Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), Station de Kamboinsé, 01 BP 476, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso
Sanon Antoine
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Fundamental and Applied Entomology, University of Ouagadougou, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Barry R. Pittendrigh
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA
*
Get access

Abstract

Deployment of cowpea with Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt-cowpea), to control Maruca vitrata Fab., must be preceded by the development of an insect resistance management (IRM) plan to ensure a sustainable use of the in-plant protection offered by the transgenic variety. One of the components of a resistance management plan involves the use of wild or cultivated host plants as refugia. In West Africa, wild refugia have the potential to be a major component of such an IRM strategy. In the current study, we examined the occurrence of M. vitrata on three cultivated cowpea varieties and one wild alternative host, Sesbania pachycarpa D.C. Our results indicate that M. vitrata population overlapped on the wild host and cowpea. The overall insect population on S. pachycarpa represents 9–13% of the population on cultivated cowpea. Based on these findings, we suggest that S. pachycarpa may contribute as a refuge for M. vitrata population in case of deployment of Bt-cowpea.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abney, M. R., Sorenson, C. E. and Bradley, J. R. Jr (2007) Alternate crop hosts as resistance management refuges for tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens, (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in North Carolina. The Journal of Cotton Science 11, 3539.Google Scholar
Adesoye, A., Machuka, J. and Togun, A. (2008) Cry1Ab trangenic cowpea obtained by nodal electroporation. African Journal of Biotechnology 7, 32003210.Google Scholar
Arodokoun, D. Y., Tamò, M., Cloutier, C. and Adeoti, R. (2003) Importance of alternative host plants for the annual cycle of the legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Southern and Central Benin. Insect Science and Its Application 23, 103113.Google Scholar
Ba, N. M., Margam, V. M., Dabire-Binso, C. L., Sanon, A., McNeil, J., Murdock, L. L. and Pittendrigh, B. R. (2009) Seasonal and regional distribution of the cowpea pod borer, Maruca vitrata Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), in Burkina Faso. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 29, 109113.Google Scholar
Bakasso, Y. and Zongo, J. D. (2000) A study of genetic variability in Sesbania pachycarpa DC in Burkina Faso. Agronomie 20, 431438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berhaut, J (ed) (1976) Flore illustrée du Sénégal. Tome 5, Clairafrique, Dakar, Sénégal. 658 pp.Google Scholar
Bourguet, D., Bethenod, M. T., Trouve, C. and Viard, F. (2000) Host-plant diversity of the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis: what value for sustainable transgenic insecticidal Bt maize? Proceedings of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences 267, 11771184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaudhury, D., Madanpotra, S., Jaiwal, R., Saini, R., Kumar, P. A. and Jaiwal, P. K. (2007) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated high frequency genetic transformation of an Indian cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) cultivar and transmission of transgenes into progeny. Plant Science 172, 692700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DPSAA (2010) Contrystat Burkina Faso. Available at:http://www.countrystat.org/bfa (accessed 16 June 2011).Google Scholar
FAOSTAT(2008) World cowpea production. Available at:http://faostat.fao.org (accessed 18 September 2008). .Google Scholar
Fatokun, C. A. (2002) Breeding cowpea for resistance to insect pests: attempted crosses between cowpea and Vigna vexillata, pp. 5261. In Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing Sustainable Cowpea Production (edited by Fatokun, C. A., Tarawali, S. A., Singh, B. B., Kormawa, P. M. and Tamò, M.). Proceedings of the 3rd World Cowpea Conference held at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria, 4–8 September 2000. Ibadan: IITA.Google Scholar
Gould, F. (1998) Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: integrating pest genetics and ecology. Annual Review of Entomology 43, 701726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, C. C., Peng, W. K. and Talekar, N. S. (2002) Larval population changes in the bean pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on Sesbania cannabina on an AVRDC Farm, Tainan, Taiwan. Formosan Entomologist 22, 271278.Google Scholar
Huang, C. C., Peng, W. K. and Talekar, N. S. (2003) Characteristics of infestation by the bean pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on Sesbania cannabina. Formosan Entomologist 23, 111.Google Scholar
Jackai, L. E. N., Padulosi, S. and Ng, Q. (1996) Resistance to the legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata Fabricius, and the probable modalities involved in wild Vigna. Crop Protection 15, 753761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R. E., Bradley, J. R., van Duyn, J., Leonard, B. R., Allen, K. C., Luttrell, R., Ruberson, J., Adamczyk, J., Gore, J., Hardee, D. D., Voth, R., Sivasupramaniam, S., Mullins, J. W. and Head, G. (2008) Regional assessment of Helicoverpa zea populations on cotton and non-cotton crop hosts. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 126, 89106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlier, H. and Montegut, J. (1982) Adventices Tropicales. ORSTOM-GERDAT-ENSH, Montpellier. 490 pp.Google Scholar
Murdock, L. M., Coulibaly, O, Higgins, T. J. V., Huesing, J. E., Ishiyaku, M. F. and Sithole-Niang, I (2008) Cowpea: legume grains and forages, pp. 2356. In A Compendium of Transgenic Crop Plants (edited by Kole, C. and Hall, T. C.). Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndoye, I., Tomekpe, K., Dreyfus, B. and Dommergues, Y. R. (1990) Sesbania and Rhizobium symbiosis: nodulation and nitrogen fixation, pp. 3138. In Perennial Sesbania Species in Agroforestry Systems (edited by Macklin, B. and Evans, D. O.). Nitrogen Fixing Tree Association, Waimanalo, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Nibouche, S., Guerard, N., Martin, P. and Vaissayre, M. (2007) Modelling the role of refuges for sustainable management of dual-gene Bt cotton in West African smallholder farming systems. Crop Protection 26, 828836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onstad, D. W. (2008) Major issues in insect resistance management, pp. 116. In Insect Resistance Management: Biology, Economics and Prediction (edited by Onstad, D. W.). Academic Press, Burlington, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Onstad, D. W., Crowder, D. W., Isard, S. A., Levine, E., Spencer, J. L., O'Neal, M., Ratcliffe, S., Gray, M. E., Bledsoe, L. W., Di Fonzo, C. D, Eisley, B. and Edwards, C. R. (2003) Does landscape diversity slow the spread of rotation-resistant western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)? Environmental Entomology 32, 9921001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popelka, J. C., Gollasch, S., Moore, A., Molvig, L. and Higgins, T. J. V. (2006) Genetic transformation of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and stable transmission to progeny. Plant Cell Reports 25, 304312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS (2001) SAS Version 8 for Windows. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Singh, B. B., Chambliss, O. L. and Sharma, B. (1997) Recent advances in cowpea breeding, pp. 3049. In Advances in Cowpea Research (edited by Singh, B. B., Mohan-Raj, D. R., Dashiell, K. E. and Jackai, L. E. N.). International Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Japan International Center for Agricultural Sciences, Ibadan.Google Scholar
Singh, S. R., Jackai, L. E. N., Dos Santos, J. H. R. and Adalla, C. B. (1990) Insect pests of cowpea, pp. 4389. In Insect Pests of Tropical Food Legumes (edited by Singh, S. R.). John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester.Google Scholar
Tamo, M., Arodokoun, D. Y., Zenz, N., Tindo, M., Agboton, C. and Adeoti, R. (2002) The importance of alternative host plants for the biological control of two key cowpea insect pests, the pod borer Maruca vitrata (F.) and the flower thrips Megalurothrips sjostedti (Thrybom), pp. 8193. In Proceedings of the 3rd World Cowpea Research Conference, Ibadan, Nigeria, 5–10 September 2000 (edited by Fatokun, C. A., Tarawali, S. A., Singh, B. B., Kormawa, P. M. and Tamò, M.) IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Tan, S., Chen, X., Li, D. and Zhang, H. (2001) Can other host species of cotton bollworm be non-Bt refuges to prolong the effectiveness of Bt-cotton? Chinese Science Bulletin 46, 18041807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vialatte, A., Dedryver, C. A., Simon, J. C., Galman, M. and Plantegenest, M. (2005) Limited genetic exchanges between populations of an insect pest living on uncultivated and related cultivated host plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences 272, 10751082.Google ScholarPubMed
Wu, K., Feng, H. and Guo, Y. (2004) Evaluation of maize as a refuge for management of resistance to Bt cotton by Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in the Yellow River cotton-farming region of China. Crop Protection 23, 523530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, T. and Tang, C. (2000) Commercial production of transgenic Bt insect-resistant cotton varieties and the resistance management for bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner). Chinese Science Bulletin 45, 12491257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar