Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:11:52.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gut protease profiles of different instars of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2014

Lunminlal Kipgen  and
Kamal K. Aggarwal
Lunminlal Kipgen
Affiliation:
University School of Biotechnology, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Sector-16C, Dwarka, New Delhi110078, India
Kamal K. Aggarwal*
Affiliation:
University School of Biotechnology, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Sector-16C, Dwarka, New Delhi110078, India
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Pest control strategies against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) using protease inhibitors have relied on the gut protease profile of the later larval stages of the insect, with serine proteases being considered predominant. Little is known about the gut protease profile of early larval instars. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to detect the levels of gut protease activities in the third-, fourth-, fifth- and late fifth-instar larvae of H. armigera reared on an artificial diet using specific substrates and inhibitors. The analysis of the gut protease profiles of different instars revealed different levels of protease activities at different instar stages. Significant variations were also observed in the specific activities of trypsin, chymotrypsin, cysteine protease, carboxypeptidase-A and aminopeptidase-N across the instars. In general, the activities of the proteases increased from the third to the fifth instar and then decreased at the onset of pupation in the late fifth instar. Proteolytic activity was optimal at pH 12 for gut extracts from the third-, fourth- and fifth-instar larvae. Bioassays with phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF), a serine–cysteine protease inhibitor, revealed high mortality, and that with sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA-Na), a metalloprotease inhibitor, also showed retarded larval growth. The inhibition induced by 0.05% PMSF and 0.05% EDTA-Na in combination was similar to that induced by 0.1% PMSF alone.

Keywords

gut protease profileHelicoverpa armigeralarval instarspest controlprotease inhibition
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 172 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelucci, C., Barrett-Wilt, G. A., Hunt, D. F., Akhurst, R. J., East, P. D., Gordon, K. H. J. and Campbell, P. M. (2008) Diversity of aminopeptidases, derived from four lepidopteran gene duplications, and polycalins expressed in the midgut of Helicoverpa armigera: identification of proteins binding the δ-endotoxin, Cry1Ac of Bacillus thuringiensis . Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 38, 685–696.Google Scholar
Arnon, R. (1970) Proteolytic enzymes. Methods in Enzymology 19, 226–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmeyer, H. U., Gawehn, K. and Grassl, M. (1974) Enzymes as biochemical reagents, pp. 436–437. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, Vol.1 (edited by Bergmeyer, H. U.). Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bown, D. P., Wilkinson, H. S. and Gatehouse, J. A. (1997) Differentially regulated inhibitor-sensitive and insensitive protease genes from the phytophagous insect pest, Helicoverpa armigera, are members of complex multigene families. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 27, 625–638.Google Scholar
Bown, D. P., Wilkinson, H. S. and Gatehouse, J. A. (1998) Midgut carboxypeptidase from Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae: enzyme characterisation, cDNA cloning and expression. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 28, 739–749.Google Scholar
Bradford, M. M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248–254.Google Scholar
Browne, L. B. and Raubenheimer, D. (2003) Ontogenetic changes in the rate of ingestion and estimates of food consumption in fourth and fifth instar Helicoverpa armigera caterpillars. Journal of Insect Physiology 49, 63–71.Google Scholar
Chougule, N. P., Giri, A. P., Sainani, M. N. and Gupta, V. S. (2005) Gene expression patterns of Helicoverpa armigera gut proteases. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 35, 355–367.Google Scholar
Damle, M. S., Giri, A. P., Sainani, M. N. and Gupta, V. S. (2005) Higher accumulation of proteinase inhibitors in flowers than leaves and fruits as a possible basis for differential feeding preference of Helicoverpa armigera on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill, Cv. Dhanashree). Phytochemistry 66, 2659–2667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filippova, I. Y., Lysogorskaya, E., Oksenoit, E., Rudenskaya, G. and Stepanov, V. (1984) l-Pyroglutamyl-l-phenylalanyl-l-leucine-p-nitroanilide – a chromogenic substrate for thiol proteinase assay. Analytical Biochemistry 143, 293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaffery, A. R. (1998) Resistance to insecticides in heliothine Lepidoptera: a global view. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 353, 1735–1750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagarkatti, S. and Prakash, A. (1974) Rearing of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) on an artificial diet. Technical Bulletin of the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Bangalore 17, 169–173.Google Scholar
Oppert, B., Morgan, T. D. and Kramer, K. J. (2004) Inhibitor strategies to control coleopteran pests. International Congress Series 1275, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özgür, E., Yücel, M. and Öktem, H. A. (2009) Identification and characterization of hydrolytic enzymes from the midgut of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 33, 285–294.Google Scholar
Patankar, A. G., Giri, A. P., Harsulkar, A. M., Sainani, M. N., Deshpande, V. V., Ranjekar, P. K. and Gupta, V. S. (2001) Complexity in specificities and expression of Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinases explains polyphagous nature of the insect pest. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 31, 453–464.Google Scholar
Pauchet, Y., Muck, A., Svatos, A., Heckel, D. G. and Preiss, S. (2008) Mapping the larval midgut lumen proteome of Helicoverpa armigera, a generalist herbivorous insect. Journal of Proteome Research 7, 1629–1639.Google Scholar
Peleiderer, G. (1970) Proteolytic enzymes, pp. 514–521. In Methods in Enzymology, Vol.19 (edited by Perlmann, G. E. and Lorand, L.). Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Secades, P. and Guijarro, J. (1999) Purification and characterization of an extracellular protease from the fish pathogen Yersinia ruckeri and effect of culture conditions on production. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 3969–3975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senthilkumar, R., Cheng, C. P. and Yeh, K. W. (2010) Genetically pyramiding protease-inhibitor genes for dual broad-spectrum resistance against insect and phytopathogens in transgenic tobacco. Plant Biotechnology Journal 8, 65–75.Google Scholar
Tamhane, V. A., Chougule, N., Giri, A., Dixit, A., Sainani, M. and Gupta, V. (2005) In vivo and in vitro effect of Capsicum annuum proteinase inhibitors on Helicoverpa armigera gut proteinases. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – General Subjects 1722, 156–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamhane, V. A., Giri, A. P., Sainani, M. N. and Gupta, V. S. (2007) Diverse forms of Pin-II family proteinase inhibitors from Capsicum annuum adversely affect the growth and development of Helicoverpa armigera . Gene 403, 29–38.Google Scholar
Wirnt, R. (1974 a) Chymotrypsin, measurements with n-benzoyl-l-tyrosine ethyl ester as substrate, pp. 1006–1012. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis: Samples, Reagents, Assessment of Results, Vol.2 (edited by Bergmeyer, H. U.). Verlag Chemie, Weinheim.Google Scholar
Wirnt, R. (1974 b) Trypsin, measurements with N-α-p-toluenesulfonyl-l-arginine methyl ester as substrate, pp. 1013–1024. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis: Samples, Reagents, Assessment of Results, Vol.2 (edited by Bergmeyer, H. U.). Verlag Chemie, Weinheim.Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Chen, H., Wu, Y., Yang, Y. and Wu, S. (2007) Mutated cadherin alleles from a field population of Helicoverpa armigera confer resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 73, 6939–6944.Google Scholar