Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:22:58.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The enhanced suitability of hybrid goats over the indigenous East African goat as hosts for rearing Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Peter V. Warner
Affiliation:
4901 River Road, Oakdale, CA 95361, U.S.A.
David Mung'ong'o
Affiliation:
Tsetse Research Institute, Ministry of Livestock Development, P.O. Box 1026, Tanga, Tanzania
Omari S. Chalo
Affiliation:
Tsetse Research Institute, Ministry of Livestock Development, P.O. Box 1026, Tanga, Tanzania
Harald H. Baumgartner
Affiliation:
International Atomic Energy Agency, P.O. Box 200, A-1400, Vienna, Austria
Darrell L. Williamson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Service, USDA, P.O. Box 2280, Honolulu, HI 96804, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

The suitability of the East African goat and various types of hybrid goats to serve as hosts for tsetse was compared over an extended period. Although there was no significant difference between indigenous and hybrid goats when feeding up to 350 flies per host, about 94% more indigenous goats than hybrid goats became unsuitable as hosts and required a prolonged period of rest when the fly burden was increased to 450 flies per host. Of the hybrid types assessed, Toggenburg crosses were best suited as hosts even though they required more frequent rest periods than the other hybrid types.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Devendra, C. and Burns, M. (1970) Goat production in the tropics. Technical Communication 19, Commonwealth Agriculture Bureau, Farnham Royal, Bucks, England.Google Scholar
Epstein, H. (1953) The dwarf goats of Africa. E. Afr. agric. J. 18, 123132.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. M. and Crewe, W. (1948) The mechanisms by which mosquitoes and tsetse flies obtain their blood meal, the histology of the lesions produced, and the subsequent reactions of the mammalian host; together with some observations on the feeding of Chrysops and Cimex. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 42, 334363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, I. L. and Maule, J. P. (1960) The Indigenous Livestock of Eastern and Southern Africa. Technical Communication 14, Commonwealth Agriculture Bureau, Farnham Royal, Bucks, England.Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M., Jordan, A. M. and Boyle, J. A. (1968) The large-scale rearing of Glossina austeni Newst. in the laboratory. IV. The final technique. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 62, 336341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, T. A. M. (1970) Possible induction in goats of immunological tolerance against the saliva of uninfected tsetse flies (Glossina spp.). Trop. Anim. Hlth Prod. 2, 126130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, P. V., Williamson, D. L., Gregory, D. J., Isangya, A. and Karosi, E. (1984) In vivo rearing of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood in Tanzania (Diptera: Glossinidae). I. Acquisition and development of host animals. Trop. Dis. Bull. In press.Google Scholar
Williamson, D. L., Baumgartner, H., Mtuya, A. G. and Warner, P. V. (1983) Integration of insect sterility and insecticides for control of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood in Tanzania (Diptera: Glossinidae). I. Production of tsetse flies for release. Bull. ent. Res. of 73, 259265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar