Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T08:25:55.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of thiotepa on ovarian development of the flesh fly, Sarcophaga ruficornis Fabr. (Diptera: Sarcophagidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

R. P. Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur—273 001, India
S. P. Chand
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur—273 001, India
Get access

Abstract

—The flesh fly, Sarcophaga ruficornis Fabr., was fed on thiotepa, and it was found that a 1% thiotepa solution produced complete sterility, which was due to the damage to the follicle cells and nurse cells. The passage of the female protein, ‘vitellogenin’, was blocked. Therefore, no trace of yolk granules was visible in the treated oocytes, but the oocytes and cytoplasm of the nurse cell contained vacuoles, and their nuclei were characterized by clumped chromatin contents.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, L. M. and Telfer, W. H. (1970) Extracellular concentrating of proteins in the cecropia moth follicle. J. Cell. Physiol. 76, 3753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bier, K. (1963) Synthese, interzelliilarer transport und abban von ribonukleinsaure im ovar der stubenfliege Musca domestica. J. Cell. Biol. 16, 436440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhry, H. S. and Tripathi, C. P. M. (1976) Histopathological effect of thiourea on the ovarian tissues of Sarcophaga ruficornis (Fabr.). Experientia 32, 103104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Combiesco, I., Enesco, A. and Ticu, V. (1967) Etude de l'action des chemosterilisantes thiotepaet apholate sur le development des ovaries, II. Arch roum. Path. exp. Microbiol. 26, 215228.Google Scholar
Crystal, M. M. and Lachance, I. E. (1963) The modification of reproduction in insects treated with alkylating agents. I. Inhibition of ovarian growth and egg production and hatchability. Biol. Bull. 125, 270279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, J. (1964) Influence dun inhibiteurde l'acide folique sur l'orgogenesede la Drosophila I. Etude la fecondite du pourcentage d'eclosion de la taille dex ocufs. J. Insect Physiol. 10, 805817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J. A. and Brown, A. W. A. (1967) Effect of the chemosterilant hempa on the yellow fever mosquito and its liability to induce resistance. J. econ. Ent. 60, 974978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, E. D. and Frank, J. (1952) Sterility in the female fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster; produced by the feeding of a folic acid antogonist. Am. J. Physiol. 171, 726727.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, E. D. and Harnley, M. H. (1950) Reversal of action of folic acid antagonist 4. Aminopteroglutamic acid in Drosophila melanogaster. Cancer Res. 10, 220.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, E. D., Tobias, E. B. and Harnly, M. N. (1948) Folic acid antagonists and the development of Drosophila melanogaster. Anat. Rec. 101, 93.Google ScholarPubMed
Knipling, E. F. (1955) Possibilities of insect control or irradication through the use of sexuallysterile males. J. econ. Ent. 48, 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landa, V. and Rezabova, B. (1964) The effect of chemosterilants on the development of reproductive organs in insects. Proceedings of the XII International Congress on Entomology 8–16 July, London, England, pp. 516517.Google Scholar
Morgan, P. B. (1967a) Effects of hempa on the ovarian development of house flies Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60, 812828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, P. B. (1967b) Inhibition by 5-fluorootic acid on the ovarian development of house flies, Musca domestica. J. econ. Ent. 60, 11581161.Google ScholarPubMed
Morgan, P. B. and Labrecque, G. C. (1962) The effect of apholate on the ovarian development of house flies. J. econ. Ent. 55, 826828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, P. B. and Labrecque, G. C. (1964) Effect of tepa and metepa on ovarian development of house flies. J. econ. Ent. 57, 896899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulla, M. S. (1964) Chemosterilization of mosquito Culex p. quinquefasciatus. Mosquito News 24, 212217.Google Scholar
Murray, W. S. and Bickley, W. E. C. (1964) Effect of apholate on southern house mosquito Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus Say. Bull. Mass, agric. Exp. Stn A–134, 137.Google Scholar
Serebrovsky, A. S. (1940) A possible new method for combating insect pests. Zool. Zh. 19, 618.Google Scholar
Telefer, W. H. (1961) The route of entry and localization of blood proteins in the oocytes of saturnid moths. J. biochem. Cytol. 9, 747759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telfer, W. H. (1975) Development and physiology of the oocyte nurse cell Syncytium. In Advancesin Insect Physiology (Ed. by Treherne, J. E., Berridge, M. J. and Wigglesworth, V. B.), Vol. 2, pp. 292293. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Wilkens, J. L. (1968) The endocrine and nutritional control of egg maturation in the flesh fly Sarcophaga bullata. J. Insect Physiol. 14, 927943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar