Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:16:59.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The distribution and climbing behaviour of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus Neumann on grass stems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2017

J. W. Chiera
J. W. Chiera
Affiliation:
The International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), P.O. Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

The distribution of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus on Setaria sphacelata flowerheads was investigated. Adult tick counts in a paddock, heavily infested with ticks for experimental purposes, revealed an aggregated distribution by deviating significantly from the expected Poisson distribution, but producing a good fit to the expected negative binomial distribution. A higher proportion of the ticks were on old dry flowerheads than on young green ones. Tests carried out in the laboratory confirmed the marked preference for old flowerheads and the aggregated pattern of distribution. The tick counts in the field revealed no sexual aggregation, though the total number of females collected was significantly higher than that of the males.

Keywords

Distributionclimbing behaviourgrass flowerheadsaggregationS. sphacelataR. appendiculatus
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 213 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bliss, C. I. and Fisher, R. A. (1953) Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data. Biometrics 9, 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, T. O. (1976) The aggregation of questing ticks, Rhipicephalus pulcheltus on grass stems, with observations on Rhipicephalus appendiculatus. Physiol. Ent. 1, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, J. and Donnelly, J. (1962) Microgeographic aggregations in blowfly populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 31, 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, E. A. and Saugier, B. (1978) Biophysics of a natural grassland: Evaporation. J. appl. Ecol. 15, 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R., Woiwod, I. P. and Perry, J. N. (1978) The density-dependence of spatial behaviour and the rarity of randomness. J. Anim. Ecol. 47, 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadley, F. M. (1950) Notes of the form and distribution of insect and plant populations. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 43, 581–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, W. E. (1959) A quantitative measure of aggregation of insects. J. econ. Ent. 52, 1180–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar