Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:10:03.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Circadian activity of Smicronyx guineanus Voss, a potential biocontrol agent of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Doulaye Traoré*
Affiliation:
Institut de l'Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), CRREA de Farako-bâ, Programme Coton, B. P. 208 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
Charles Vincent
Affiliation:
Centre de recherches et de développement en Horticulture Agriculture et Agro-Alimentaire Canada 430 Boul. Gouin, Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Québec, Canada J3B 3E6
Robin K. Stewart
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Macdonald Campus of McGill University, 21,111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada H9X 3V9
Get access

Abstract

The circadian activity of adults of Smicronyx guineanus Voss (Coleóptera: Curculionidae) was studied in semi-field conditions. Pairs of weevils were observed on a 24-h cycle starting from 0800 to the following day at 0600 hrs for 21 days in cages containing Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth (Scrophulariaceae) plants parasitising sorghum. Each female and male was observed every second hour. Occurrences of the various behaviours exhibited by the weevil were recorded. In decreasing frequency, the weevils were observed to be standing still, feeding, mating, walking, moving and foraging. In addition, the difference in time spent on the different parts of the host plant—classified into four groups: A- stem, leaves and bud; B- corolla; C- calyx; and D- sorghum, petiole, soil, capsule and cage—was highly significant (P = 0.0001,10 couples/days, n = 21 days). The weevil adults spent 46.8% of their time on the Striga inflorescence (bud, corolla and calyx). Striga plants were also stratified with respect to distance from the base and categories were designated as upper, central and lower parts. Smicronyx adults spent 85.2% of their time in the upper stratum, 9.8% in the central stratum and 5% of their occurrences were in the lower third of the Striga shoot. They were more active during daytime, suggesting that the best period of day to sample the weevils in the field is from 0700 to 1100 or from 1600 to 1800 hrs.

Résumé

L'activité journalière des adultes de Smicronyx a été étudiée dans des conditions semi-naturelles. Des couples de charançons ont été observés pendant 24 h à partir de 8 h le matin jusqu'au lendemain à 6 h et ceci a été répété 21 fois (21 jours) en 1992 et 1993 dans des cages contenant des plantes de Striga hermonthica parasitant des plantes de sorgho. Chaque femelle et mâle a été observé toutes les deux heures. Les différentes exhibitions de comportement des charançons ont été notées. Dans l'ordre décroissant, les charançons ont été observés à rester immobile, à se nourrir, à s'accoupler, à marcher, à se mouvoir et à prospecter. En plus, la différence de temps passé sur les parties de la plante hôte a été hautement significative. Ces parties de la plante de Striga et autres ont été groupées en quatre: groupe A = tige, feuille et bouton floral; groupe B = corolle; groupe C = calyx; groupe D = sorgho, pétiole, sol, capsule et paroi de la cage. Les charançons adultes ont passé 46,8% de leur temps sur les inflorescences du Striga (bouton floral, corolle et calyx). Les plantes de Striga ont été stratifiées à partir de la base et les catégories étant les parties supérieure, centrale et inférieure. Les adultes de Smicronyx ont été observés 85,2% de leur temps sur la partie supérieure, 9,8% sur la partie centrale et 5% de leur apparition ont été sur la partie inférieure des pieds de Striga. Ils ont été plus actifs pendant le jour, suggérant que la meilleure période du jour pour les échantillonner dans les champs se situerait de 7 h à 11 h le matin et de 16 h à 18 h dans l'après-midi.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, J. (1989) Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach, 4th ed. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. M. and Cox, M. (1997) Smicronyx species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), economically important seed predátors of witchweeds (Striga spp.) (Scrophulariaceae) in sub-Saharan Africa. Bull. Entomol. Res. 87, 317.Google Scholar
Bashir, M. O. (1987) the potential for biological control of witchweeds, pp. 183206. In Parasitic Weeds in Agriculture (Edited by Musselman, L. J.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
Bashir, M. O. and Musselman, L. J. (1984) Some natural enemies of Striga hermonlhica in the Sudan. Trop. Pest. Manage. 30, 211212.Google Scholar
Chouinard, G., Vincent, C., Hill, S. B. and Panneton, B. (1992) Cyclic behavior of plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), within caged dwarf apple trees in spring, J. Insect Behav. 5, 385394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girling, D. J., Greathead, D. J., Mohyuddin, A. I. and Sankaran, I. (1979) The potential for biological control in the suppression of parasitic weeds. Biocontrol News Info., Sample issue, 1, 716.Google Scholar
Greathead, D. J. (1984) The natural enemies of Striga spp. and the prospects for their utilization as biological control agents, pp. 133160. In Striga — Biology and Control (Edited by Ayensu, E. S., Doggett, H., Keynes, H., Marton-Lefevre, J., Musselman, L. J., Parker, C. and Pickering, A.). International Council of Scientific Unions, Paris.Google Scholar
Greathead, D. J. and Milner, J. E. D. (1971) A survey of Striga spp. (Scrophulariaceae) and their insect natural enemies in East Africa with a discussion on the possibilities of biological control. Trop. Agrie. 48, 111124.Google Scholar
Johansson, F. (1993) Diel feeding behavior in larvae of four odonate species, J. Insect Behav. 6, 253264.Google Scholar
Kaas, J. P., Ramaswamy, S. B. and Elzen, G. W. (1993) Behavioral time budget and periodicity exhibited by Microplitis croceipes in field cages with Heliothis virescens on spring host plants. Entomophaga 38, 143154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. and Bateson, P. (1989) Measuring Behavior: An Introductory Guide. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mboob, S. S. (1986) A regional programme for West and Central Africa, pp. 191194. In Proceedings of the FAO/OAU All-African Government Consultation on Striga Control, Maroua, Cameroon.Google Scholar
Parker, C. and Riches, C. R. (1993) Parasitic Weeds of the World: Biology and Control. CAB International. Castlefield Press, Kettering, Northants, UK.Google Scholar
Traoré, D. (1995) Bionomics of Smicronyx guineanus Voss and Sm. umbrinus Hustache (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), potential biocontrol agents of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth., PhD thesis, Macdonald Campus, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Traoré, D., Vincent, C. and Stewart, R. K. (1995) Life history of Smicronyx guineanus Voss and Sm. umbrinus Hustache (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. (Scrophulariaceae). Entomophaga 40, 211221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traoré, D., Vincent, C. and Stewart, R. K. (1996) Association and synchrony of Smicronyx guineanus Voss, Sm. umbrinus Hustache (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. (Scrophulariaceae). Biol. Control 7, 307315.Google Scholar
Wiskerke, J. S. C. and Vet, L. E. M. (1994) Foraging for solitarily and gregariously feeding caterpillars: A comparison of two related parasitoid species (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Insect Behav. 7, 585603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar