Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:38:52.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bradford's law and the Nigerian entomological literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

Gbade A. Alabi
Gbade A. Alabi
Affiliation:
Department of Library Studies, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria*
Get access

Abstract

Journal citations in Bibliography of entomological research in Nigeria: 1900–1973 were subjected to Bradford analysis with the view of evaluating the completeness of the bibliography and determining the core journals and core authors. As to the completeness of the bibliography, it was inferred that the bibliography is 93% complete in terms of journals and 84% complete in terms of articles. On further testing the law for its applicability on author distribution, it was observed that the observed value for total number of authors was just a little above 50% of the actual figure. This may suggest that as in a similar study Bradford's law may not be as applicable to author distribution as it is for literature although the verbal formulation of the law has been found to be applicable to users distribution of periodical literature in a library. On the other hand, the investigation revealed that only three journals (i.e. 1.4% of the total number of 216 listed in the bibliography) form the core, while out of 650 authors, 21 constitute the core. The analysis also reveals an interesting phenomenon with the parameters (a measure of subject breadth being negative).

Keywords

Bradford's lawliteraturebibliographydistribution
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , February 1984 , pp. 7 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aiyepeku, W. O. (1976a) The productivity of geographical authors: a case study from Nigeria. J. Docum. 32, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiyepeku, W. O. (1976b) The productivity of geographical authors: a case study from Nigeria. J. Docum. 32, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiyepeku, W. O. (1976c) The productivity of geographical authors: a case study from Nigeria. J. Docum. 32, 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, S. C. (1948) Documentation, 2nd edn, Crosby Lockword, London.Google Scholar
Brookes, B. C. (1968a) The derivation and application of the Bradford-Zipf distribution. J. Docum. 24, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, B. C. (1968b) The derivation and application of the Bradford-Zipf distribution. J. Docum. 24, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, B. C. (1969a) Bradford's Law and the bibliography of science. Nature, Lond. 224, 933–936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brookes, B. C. (1969b) Bradford's Law and the bibliography of science. Nature, Lond. 224, 933–936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffman, W. and Morris, T. G. (1970) Bradford's Law and library acquisitions. Nature, Lond. 226, 922–923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawani, S. M. (1973) Bradford's Law and the literature of agriculture. International Libr. Rev. 5, 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, A. (1973a) Bradford's Law and the periodical literature of information science. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sei. 20, 207–213.Google Scholar
Pope, A. (1973b) Bradford's Law and the periodical literature of information science. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sei. 20, 207–213.Google Scholar
Pope, A. (1973c) Bradford's Law and the periodical literature of information science. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sei. 20, 207–213.Google Scholar
Toye, B. O. (1974) Bibliography of entomological research in Nigeria: 1900–1973. Occ. Pub. Ent. Soc. Nigeria, No. 16. 133 p.Google Scholar
Toye, B. O. (1975) Some characteristics of the Nigerian entomological literature. Nigerian J. Ent. 2, 173–180.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, E. (1972) Bradford's Law of scatter. J. Docum. 28, 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar