Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:10:43.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An improved tsetse trap for Glossina tachinoides in Nigeria, the Nitse trap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2011

G. A. Omoogun ,
J. A. Onyiah  and
S. S. Shaida
G. A. Omoogun
Affiliation:
Nigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research (NITR), P.M.B. 03, Vom, Plateau State, Nigeria
J. A. Onyiah
Affiliation:
Nigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research (NITR), P.M.B. 2077, Kaduna, Kaduna State, Nigeria
S. S. Shaida
Affiliation:
Nigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research (NITR), P.M.B. 2077, Kaduna, Kaduna State, Nigeria
Get access

Abstract

Field tests were carried out to compare the performance of a new tsetse trap, the Nitse (I and II) with the biconical, F3 and NGU traps respectively at the Yankari Game Reserve, Bauchi State, Nigeria. The game reserve harbours Glossina palpalis, G. tachinoides and G. morsitans submorsitans species. The biconical trap was used as the standard. The sites had been cleared of vegetation; they were 5–10 m away from vehicle paths and about 100 m apart. Each trap was moved rotatingly until all traps were exposed to each of the five sites. Traps were emptied each morning after 24 h and the tsetse sorted according to species and sex. The data on the different trap catches were analysed using the one-way ANOVA and the multiple range test via the SPSS statistical package. The performance of the Nitse I on G. tachinoides in one area with high tsetse density was significantly better than that of each of the three traps. But for G. m. submorsitans, Nitse I and the biconical trap performed better than only the F3 (P ≤ 0.05) in the high density area. Only the biconical performed significantly better than the F3 trap in an area with low tsetse density. The new Nitse trap was more effective for G. tachinoides than for G. m. submorsitans.

Résumé

On fit les épreuves aux champs pour évaluer l'accomplissement du piége Nitse (I et II), un nouveau piège, auprès des pièges biconiques, F3, et NGU respectivement à la réserve des animaux à Yankari, l'état de Bauchi, au Nigéria, là où les espèces des mouches Glossina palpalis, G. tachinoides et G. morsitans submorsitans existent. On a utilisé le piège biconique comme le piège de modèle de l'étude. On a placé les pièges en emplacements différents de végétation abbatrie séparés de 100 m et 5–10 m au toin des chemins de véhicule. On a placé les pièges en tous les cinq emplacements l'un après l'autre. 24 heures d'après, on a déchargé les pièges chaque matin et trié les mouches attrapées selon l'espèce et le sexe. On a analysé les données des pièges différents en utilisant le one-way ANOVA et l'essai de champ d'activité de multiple par un emballage statistique de SPSS. Le piège Nitse I a accompli mieux d'une manière significative au sujet d'attraper G. tachinoides à la région A que chacun des autres pièges. Nitse I et le piège biconique ont attrapé mieux G. m. submorsitans que le F3 (P ≤ 0.05) à la région de grande densité. Le piège biconique seulement a accompli mieux d'une manière significative que le piège F3 à la région de petite densité (B). Nitse, le nouveau piège, était plus efficace pour attraper G. tachinoides que pour attraper G. m. submorsitans.

Keywords

Glossina spp.new traptrialcomparisonGlossina spp.nouveau piègeessaidecomparaison
Type
Research Articles
Information
International Journal of Tropical Insect Science , Volume 15 , Issue 4-5 , October 1994 , pp. 529 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © ICIPE 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allan, S. A., Day, T. F. and Edman, J. D. (1987) Visual ecology of biting flies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 32, 297–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brightwell, R., Dransfield, R. D., Kyorku, C., Golder, T. K., Tarimo, S. A. and Mungai, D.(1987) Anew trap for Glossina pallidipes. Trop. Pest. Mgt. 33, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1955) The natural history of tsetse flies. Mem. Lond. Sch. Hyg. Trop. Med. No. 10. London. Lewis816 pp.Google Scholar
Challier, A. (1982) The ecology of tsetse (Glossina spp.). (Diptera, Glossinidae): A review (1970–1981). Insect Sci. Applic. 3, 97–143.Google Scholar
Challier, A. and Laveissiere, C. (1973) Un nouveau piège pour la capture des Glossines (Glossina: Diptera, Muscidae): Description et essais sur le terrain. Cah. ORSTOM Ser. Entomol. Med. Parasit. 11, 251–262.Google Scholar
Chorley, C. W. (1933) Traps for tsetse flies of the ‘crinoline’ and ‘ventilator’ forms. Bull. Ent. Res. 24, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Costa, B. F. B., Sant' Anna, J. F., Dos Santos, A. C. and Alvares, M. J. de A. (1915) Sleeping sickness, a record of four years war against it in Principe, Portuguese West Africa. (Translated from the Portuguese text by Wyllie J. A. 1916 London).Google Scholar
Davies, H. (1977) Tsetse Flies in Nigeria. 3rd ed.Oxford University Press, Ibadan.Google Scholar
Flint, S. (1985) A comparison of various traps for Glossina spp. (Glossinidae) and other Diptera. Bull. Ent. Res. 75, 529–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasgow, J. P. and Phelps, R. J. (1970) Methods for the collecting and sampling of Glossina. In The African Trypanosomiases (Edited by Mulligan, H. W. and Potts, W. H.), pp. 395–415. Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Gouteux, J. P., Challier, A. and Laveissière, C. (1981) Modifications et essais du piège à glossines (Diptera, Glossinidae) Challier-Laveissière. Cah. ORSTOM, Ser. Entomol. Méd. Parasitol. 19, 87–99.Google Scholar
Gouteux, J. P. and Lancien, J. (1986) Le piège pyramidal a tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae) pour la capture et la lutte. Essais comparatifs et déscription de nouveaux systemes de capture. Trop. Med. Parasit. 37, 61–66.Google Scholar
Green, C. H. (1988) The effect of colour on trap and screen-orientated responses in Glossina palpalis palpalis (Robineau-Desvoidy) (Diptera: Glossinidae). Bull. Ent. Res. 78, 591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C. H. (1989) The use of two coloured screens for catching Glossina palpalis palpalis (Robineau-Desvoidy) (Diptera: Glossinidae) Bull. Ent. Res. 79, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C. H. and Hint, S. (1986) An analysis of colour effects in the performance of the F2 trap against Glossina pallidipes Austen and G. morsitans morsitans Westwood (Diptera: Glossinidae). Bull. Ent. Res. 76, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrove, J. E. (1977) Some advances in the trapping of tsetse (Glossina spp.) and other flies. Ecol. Entomol. 2, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. H. T. P. (1930) Report on the bionomics of the tsetse fly (Glossina pallidipes Aust), and a preliminary report on a new method of control, presented to the Provincial Administration Natal. Fol. 75 pp Pietermaritzburg.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. M. (1986) Trypanosomiasis Control and African Rural Development. Longman, New York.Google Scholar
Lancien, J. (1981) Description du piège monoconique utilise pour l'elimination des glossines en Republique Populaire du Congo. Cah. ORSTOM, Sér. Ent. Méd. Parasit. 19, 235–238.Google Scholar
Morris, K. R. S. (1960) Trapping as a means of studying the game tsetse, Glossina pallidipes Aust. Bull. Ent. Res. 51, 533–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, K. R. S. and Morris, M. G. (1949) The use of traps against tsetse in West Africa. Bull. Ent. Res. 39, 491–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swynnerton, C. F. M. (1933) Some traps for tsetse flies. Bull. Ent. Res. 24, 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torr, S. J., Parker, A. G. and Leigh-Browne, G. (1989) The responses of Glossina pallidipes Austen (Diptera: Glossinidae) to odour-baited traps and targets in Somalia. Bull. Ent. Res. 79, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, D. A. (1980) A novel marking/release/recapture method for possible use in determining aspects of tsetse fly behaviour. Insect Sci.Applic. 1, 1–7.Google Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1974) The responses of tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) to mobile and stationary baits. Bull. Ent. Res. 64, 545–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1982a) The improvement of traps for tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae). Bull. Ent. Res. 72, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. (1982b) The trap-orientated behaviour of tsetse flies (Glossinidae) and other Diptera. Bull. Ent. Res. 72, 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. and Hargrove, J. W. (1979) A method of studying the efficiency of traps for tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) and other insects. Bull. Ent. Res. 69, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A., Bursell, E. and Hargrove, J. W. (1985) Catching-out the tsetse fly. Parasitology Today 1, 106–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vale, G. A., Lovemore, D. F., Flint, S. and Cockbill, G. F. (1988) Odour-baited target to control tsetse flies, Glossina spp. (Diptera: Glossinidae), in Zimbabwe. Bull. Ent. Res. 78, 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar