VP94 Framework Of High-Quality Value Assessment Criteria In Health Care

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

No single assessment can evaluate the wide spectrum of health technologies pending access to healthcare systems. It is important to envision a complex systematic framework, in which different instruments are used for different purposes - all criteria should be used to ensure the transparency of the process, and should model good assessment and implementation practices (1,2).

METHODS:

A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted from September 2013 to May 2015 which was designed to gain information about the present status of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) activities; to examine its institutional contexts and the kind of application of its principles, logic, assessment methods, tools and best practices.

RESULTS:

A total number of 161 questionnaires from 39 countries on 6 continents were received representing a 41.7 percent response rate. Based on analysis of the results, a complex systematic framework for value assessment was designed. Five major features define the framework that can fully measure the common and support the evaluation of more complex health technologies: (i) implementation of higher-order evaluation approaches that support complex multi-criteria assessment, rather than emphasizing only the use of basic evaluation procedures; (ii) precise evaluation of critical criteria, that measure technologies directly as they will be used in actual practical settings; (iii) assessment approaches, based on international best HTA practices that are accurate, in terms of the content and context of the evaluated technology, as well as the expected performance; (iv) high-fidelity priority-setting elements that are evaluation sensitive; and (v) assessments that are sound, unbiased, and transparent – in order to be truly valid for a wide range of technologies, assessments should evaluate them accurately and do so reliably across technology content and context. They should be unbiased and accessible and used in ways that support superior outcomes and higher quality for healthcare systems.

CONCLUSIONS:

The healthcare systems that decide to use this framework should evaluate the set of assessments they select and develop them against the standards required, and should use them in ways for which they have been appropriately validated and in contexts that ensure a transparent evaluation process (3).