Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:16:23.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technology Assessment of the Dutch Lung Transplantation Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Petra J. Van Enckevort ,
Elisabeth M. Tenvergert ,
Gouke J. Bonsel ,
Albert Geertsma ,
Wim Van Der Bij ,
Wim J. De Boer ,
Marc A. Koopmanschap ,
Maiwenn J. Al  and
Frans F.h. Ruttten
Petra J. Van Enckevort
Affiliation:
University Hospital Groningen
Elisabeth M. Tenvergert
Affiliation:
University Hospital Groningen
Gouke J. Bonsel
Affiliation:
Academic Medical Center
Albert Geertsma
Affiliation:
University Hospital Groningen
Wim Van Der Bij
Affiliation:
University Hospital Groningen
Wim J. De Boer
Affiliation:
University Hospital Groningen
Marc A. Koopmanschap
Affiliation:
Erasmus University
Maiwenn J. Al
Affiliation:
Erasmus University
Frans F.h. Ruttten
Affiliation:
Erasmus University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The costs, effects, and cost-effectiveness of the Dutch Lung Transplantation program were assessed. The results show that lung transplantation is a very costly intervention that improves survival and quality of life. Costs per life-year and per QALY gained were, respectively, US $90,000 and US $71,000.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , Spring 1998 , pp. 344 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Al, M. J., Koopmanschap, M. A., van Enckevort, P. J., et al. Cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation in the Netherlands: A scenario-analysis. Chest, 1998, 113, 124–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Björk, S.EuroQol conference proceedings, IHE Working Paper 1992, Lund: 1991.Google Scholar
3.Bonsel, G. J., Essink-Bot, M. L., Klompmaker, I. J., & Slooff, M.J.H.Assessment of the quality of life before and following liver transplantation: First results. Transplantation, 1992, 53, 796–800.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Bonsel, G. J., Klompmaker, I. J., Essink-Bot, M. L., et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Dutch liver transplantation program. Transplantation Proceedings, 1990, 22, 1481–84.Google Scholar
5.Busschbach, J. J., Horikx, P. E., van den Bosch, J. M. M., et al. Preliminary study: Measuring the quality of life before and after bilateral lung transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest, 1994, 105, 911–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Campbell, A.Subjective measures of well-being. American Journal of Psychology, 1976, 31, 117–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Cooper, J. D., Patterson, A., Trulock, E. P., et al. Results of single and bilateral lung transplantation in 131 consecutive recipients. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascula Surgery, 1994, 107, 460–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Craven, J. L., Bright, J., & Lougheed Dear, C.Psychiatric, psychosocial and rehabilitation aspects of lung transplantation. Clinics in Chest Medicine, 1990, 11, 247–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Craven, J. L., & the Toronto Lung Transplant Group. Psychiatric aspects of lung transplant. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1990, 35, 759–64.Google ScholarPubMed
10.de Boer, W. J., & Mannes, G. P. M.. Treatment protocol lung transplantation program [in Dutch]. Groningen: 1993.Google Scholar
11.de Hoyos, A.L., Patterson, G.A., Maurer, J.R., et al. & the Toronto Lung Transplant Group. Pulmonary transplantation: early and late results. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1992, 103, 295–306.Google Scholar
12.Dienemann, H., Reichenspurner, H., Forst, H., & Reichart, B.Isolated lung transplantation [in German]. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 1994, 119, 451–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Doud, J. R., McCabe, M. M., Montoya, A., & Garrity, E. R.The Loyola University lung transplant experience. Archives of Internal Medicine, 1993, 153, 2769–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Drummond, M. F., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W.Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programs. London: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
15.Geertsma, A., & TenVergert, E. M. The supply of donor lungs [in Dutch]. In Tenvergert, E. M., (ed.), Evaluation of lung transplantation [in Dutch]. Groningen: Office fo MTA, University Hospital Groningen, 1996, 263–99.Google Scholar
16.Geertsma, A., TenVergert, E. M., de Boer, W. J., & van der Bij, W.The need for lung transplantation in the Netherlands. Transplant International, 1997, 10, 457–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Griffith, B. P., Hardesty, R. L., Armitage, J. M., et al. A decade of lung transplantation. Annals of Surgery, 1993, 218, 310–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Gross, C. R., Savik, K., Bolman, R. M., Ill, & Hertz, M. I.Long-term health status and quality of life outcomes of lung transplant recipients. Chest, 1995, 108, 1489–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Hirt, S. W., Hamm, M., Zink, C., et al. Lung and heart-lung transplantation: Indication and long-term results [in German]. Helvetica Chirurgica Acta, 1993, 60, 413–26.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Hosenpud, J. D., Novick, R. J., Breen, T. J., et al. The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twelfth official report, 1995. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 1995, 14, 805–15.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Hunt, M. S., McEwen, J., & McKenna, S. P.Measuring health status. London: Croom Helm, 1986.Google Scholar
22.Karnofsky, D. A., Abelmann, W. H., Craver, L. F., & Burchenal, J. H. The use of the nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma. Cancer, 1948, (11), 643–54.Google Scholar
23.Koopmanschap, M. A., Rutten, F. F. H., van Ineveld, B. M., & van Roijen, L.The friction cost method for estimating the indirect costs of disease. Journal of Health Economics, 1995, 14, 171–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Mannes, G. P. M., de Boer, W. J., van der Bij, W., et al. for the Groningen Lung Transplantation Group. Three hundred patients referred for lung transplantation: Experiences of the Dutch Lung Transplantation Program. Chest, 1996, 109, 408–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Michel, B. C., Bonsel, G. J., Stouthard, M. E. A., et al. Liver transplantation: The long term effectiveness [in Dutch]. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam, 1992.Google Scholar
26.Michel, B. C., van Hout, B. A., & Bonsel, G. J.Assessing the benefits of transplant services. Baillieres Clinical Gastroenterology, 1994, 8, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Ramsey, S. D., Patrich, D. L., Albert, R. K., et al. The cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation; A pilot study. Chest, 1995, 108, 1594–1601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Reemtsma, K., Gelijns, A. C., Sisk, J. E., et al. Supporting future surgical innovation: Lung transplantation as a case study. Annals of Surgery, 1993, 218, 465–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Rutten, F. F. H., van Ineveld, B. M., van Ommen, R., et al. Cost calculation concerning health care research: Recommendations for general practice [in Dutch]. Utrecht: Van Arkel, 1993.Google Scholar
30.Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E (eds.). STAI manual for the statetrait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970.Google Scholar
31. St. Louis International Lung Transplant Registry. April 1995 report.Google Scholar
32.Ten Vergert, E. M., Essink-Bot, M. L., Geertsma, A., et al. The effect of lung transplantation on health-related quality of life: a longitudinal study. Chest. 1998, 113, in press.Google ScholarPubMed
33.TenVergert, E. M., van Enckevort, P. J., & Geertsma, A. Cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation in the Netherlands: 57 transplantations [in Dutch]. In Tenvergert, E. M., (ed.), Evaluation of lung transplantation [in Dutch]. Groningen: Office for MTA, University Hospital Groningen, 1996, 247–261.Google Scholar
34.The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: A new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 1990,16,199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.van Enckevort, P. J., Koopmanschap, M. A., TenVegert, E. M., et al. Lifetime costs of lung transplantation. Health Economics, 1997, 6, 479–89.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36.van Hout, B. A., Bonsel, G., Habbema, D., et al. Heart transplantation in the Netherlands: Costs, effects and scenarios. Journal of Health Economics, 1993, 12, 73–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37.Zung, W. W. K., & Durham, N. C.A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1980, 35, 243–49.Google Scholar