Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:02:30.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEMIAUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS FOR IN-HOSPITAL EARLY DEFIBRILLATION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2014

Federico Nocchi ,
Pietro Derrico ,
Gerardina Masucci ,
Carlo Capussotto ,
Corrado Cecchetti  and
Matteo Ritrovato
Federico Nocchi
Affiliation:
Clinical Technology Innovation Research Area and Clinical Engineering Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS
Pietro Derrico
Affiliation:
Clinical Technology Innovation Research Area and Clinical Engineering Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS
Gerardina Masucci
Affiliation:
Clinical Engineering Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS; Ingegneria Biomedica Santa Lucia S.p.A.
Carlo Capussotto
Affiliation:
Clinical Engineering Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS
Corrado Cecchetti
Affiliation:
Emergency Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS
Matteo Ritrovato
Affiliation:
Clinical Technology Innovation Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: Semiautomated external defibrillators (AEDs) should be considered as a means to facilitate in-hospital early defibrillation (IHED) in areas where advanced life support rescuers are not readily available. In this study, we aimed to develop a checklist and a measurement protocol to evaluate and compare AEDs by assessing factors that may affect IHED.

Methods: A clinical and technical comparison of six AEDs was performed. Technical specifications were analyzed, while an emergency team evaluated ergonomics and appropriateness for IHED at Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital. A measurement protocol was implemented, which aimed to assess the ability of defibrillators to recognize shockable and nonshockable rhythms, accuracy of delivered energy, and charging time.

Results: Designs of AEDs differed in several features which influence their appropriateness for IHED. Some units showed poor ergonomics and instructions/feedback for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Differences between defibrillators in recognizing shockable and nonshockable rhythms emerged for polymorphic ventricular tachycardia waveforms and when the frequency and amplitude of input signals varied. Tests for accuracy revealed poor performances at low and high impedance levels for most AEDs. Notably, differences greater than 20 seconds were found in the time from power-on to “ready for discharge.”

Conclusions: The approach we used to assess AEDs allowed us to evaluate their appropriateness with respect to the organizational context, to measure their parameters, and to compare models. Results showed that ergonomics and/or performances (timing and accuracy) could be improved in each device.

Keywords

DefibrillatorsTechnology assessmentBiomedicalBiomedical engineeringCardiopulmonary resuscitationDeathSuddenCardiac
Type
Assessments
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 78 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Koster, RW, Baubin, MA, Bossaert, LL, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1277–1292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Deakin, CD, Nolan, JP, Sunde, K, Koster, RW. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 3. Electrical therapies: Automated external defibrillators, defibrillation, cardioversion and pacing. Resuscitation. 2010;81:1293–1304.Google Scholar
3. Caffrey, S. Feasibility of public access to defibrillation. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002;8:195–198.Google Scholar
4. Destro, A, Marzaloni, M, Sermasi, S, Rossi, F. Automatic external defibrillators in the hospital as well? Resuscitation. 1996;31:39–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Savoia, G, Bosco, G, Cerchiari, E, et al. SIAARTI-IRC Recommendations for organizing responses to In-Hospital emergencies. Minerva Anestesiol. 2007;73:533–553.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Zafari, AM, Zarter, SK, Heggen, V, et al. A program encouraging early defibrillation results in improved in-hospital resuscitation efficacy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:846–852.Google Scholar
7. Chan, PS, Krumholz, HM, Nichol, G, Nallamothu, BK. Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:9–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Sandroni, C, Nolan, J, Cavallaro, F, Antonelli, M. In-Hospital cardiac arrest: Incidence, prognosis and possible measures to improve survival. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:237–245.Google Scholar
9. Tunstall-Pedoe, H, Bailey, L, Chamberlain, DA, et al. Survey of 3765 cardiopulmonary resuscitations in British hospitals (the BRESUS Study): Methods and overall results. BMJ. 1992;304:1347–1351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Bossaert, L, Callanan, V, Cummins, RO. Early defibrillation. An advisory statement by the Advanced Life Support Working Group of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Resuscitation. 1997;34:113–114.Google Scholar
11. Sharieff, W, Kaulback, K. Assessing automated external defibrillators in preventing deaths from sudden cardiac arrest: An economic evaluation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:362–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Varon, J, Sternbach, GL, Marik, PE, Fromm, RE Jr. Automatic external defibrillators: Lessons from the past, present and future. Resuscitation. 1999;41:219–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Domanovits, H, Meron, G, Sterz, F, et al. Successful automatic external defibrillator operation by people trained only in basic life support in a simulated cardiac arrest situation. Resuscitation. 1998;39:47–50.Google Scholar
14. Kette, F, Boni, B, Liberti, M, et al. Rianimazione cardiopolmonare e defibrillazione semiautomatica. Manuale per Operatori Sanitari Secondo le Linee Guida Italian Resuscitation Council e European Resuscitation Council 2010. 3a Ed. Bologna: IRC; 2011.Google Scholar
15. Cusnir, H, Tongia, R, Sheka, KP, et al. In hospital cardiac arrest: A role for automatic defibrillation. Resuscitation. 2004;63:183–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Link, MS, Atkins, DL, Passman, RS, et al. Part 6: Electrical therapies: Automated external defibrillators, defibrillation, cardioversion, and pacing: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010;122(Suppl. 3):S706–719.Google Scholar
17. Chan, PS, Krumholz, HM, Spertus, JA, et al. Automated external defibrillators and survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2010;304:2129–2136.Google Scholar
18. Wiklund, ME. Usability tests of medical products as prelude to the clinical trial. Med Device Diagn Ind. 1991;13:46–52.Google Scholar
19. Comitato Elettrotecnico Italiano. CEI 62-47:2004-08 Guidelines to acceptance tests and to safety and performance periodical checks of cardiac defibrillators incorporating or not a monitor. Milano: CEI; 2004.Google Scholar
20. Comitato Elettrotecnico Italiano. CEI EN 60601-2-4:2004-08 Medical electrical equipment Part 2: Particular requirements for the safety of cardiac defibrillators. Milano: CEI; 2004.Google Scholar
21. Comitato Elettrotecnico Italiano. CEI EN 60601-2-4:2012-05 Medical electrical equipment Part 2: Particular requirements for basic safety and essential performance of cardiac defibrillators. Milano: CEI; 2012.Google Scholar
22. Emergency Care Research Institute. Automated external defibrillators. Health Devices. 2009;1:6–23.Google Scholar
23. Sanna, T, La Torre, G, de Waure, C, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus automated external defibrillator use by non-healthcare professionals: A meta-analysis on 1583 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2008;76:226–232.Google Scholar
24. Fleischhackl, R, Losert, H, Haugk, M, et al. Differing operational outcomes with six commercially available automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation. 2004;62:167–174.Google Scholar
25. Walker, RG, Melnick, SB, Chapman, FW, et al. Comparison of six clinically used external defibrillators in swine. Resuscitation. 2003;57:73–83.Google Scholar
26. Achleitner, U, Amann, A, Stoffaneller, M, Baubin, M. Waveforms of external defibrillators: Analysis and energy contribution. Resuscitation. 1999;41:193–200. Erratum in: Resuscitation 2000;44:139.Google Scholar
27. Achleitner, U, Rheinberger, K, Furtner, B, Amann, A, Baubin, M. Waveform analysis of biphasic external defibrillators. Resuscitation. 2001;50:61–70.Google Scholar
28. Zelinka, M, Buić, D, Zelinka, I. Comparison of five different defibrillators using recommended energy protocols. Resuscitation. 2007;74:500–507.Google Scholar
29. Atkinson, E, Mikysa, B, Conway, JA, et al. Specificity and sensitivity of automated external defibrillator rhythm analysis in infants and children. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:185–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Kerber, RE, Becker, LB, Bourland, JD, et al. Automatic external defibrillators for public access defibrillation: Recommendations for specifying and reporting arrhythmia analysis algorithm performance, incorporating new waveforms, and enhancing safety. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association Task Force on Automatic External Defibrillation, Subcommittee on AED Safety and Efficacy. Circulation. 1997;95:1677–1682.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Nocchi Supplementary Material

Figure 1

Download Nocchi Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 170.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nocchi Supplementary Material

Table 1

Download Nocchi Supplementary Material(File)
File 60.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nocchi Supplementary Material

Table 2

Download Nocchi Supplementary Material(File)
File 59 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nocchi Supplementary Material

Table 3

Download Nocchi Supplementary Material(File)
File 62.3 KB