Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T02:29:40.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scottish Health Technologies Group: enhancing patient engagement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2021

James Angus Stewart*
Affiliation:
Healthcare Improvement Scotland Glasgow, Scottish Health Technologies Group, 4th Floor, Delta House, 50 West Nile Street, GlasgowG1 2NP, UK
Edward Clifton
Affiliation:
Healthcare Improvement Scotland Glasgow, Scottish Health Technologies Group, 4th Floor, Delta House, 50 West Nile Street, GlasgowG1 2NP, UK
Karen Macpherson
Affiliation:
Healthcare Improvement Scotland Glasgow, Scottish Health Technologies Group, 4th Floor, Delta House, 50 West Nile Street, GlasgowG1 2NP, UK
Nikolina Angelova
Affiliation:
Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
Graeme Morrison
Affiliation:
Healthcare Improvement Scotland Glasgow, Scottish Health Technologies Group, 4th Floor, Delta House, 50 West Nile Street, GlasgowG1 2NP, UK
*
Author for correspondence: James Angus Stewart, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objectives

The Scottish Health Technologies Group (SHTG) provides evidence support and advice to the National Health Service in Scotland on the use of new and existing health technologies, which, although not medicines, are likely to have significant implications for people's care. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the developments that have taken place in the SHTG's patient involvement processes in the years 2017 to 2019, focusing primarily on specific engagement with patient organizations and considering how the new approaches have been received by stakeholders.

Methods

Feedback from patient organizations that participated in the SHTG submission process, alongside SHTG committee members’ views on patient organizations contributions, was gathered primarily via online questionnaires. The number of times that patient organizations were invited and accepted the opportunity to peer-review SHTG advice statements prior to and after the employment of a Public Involvement Advisor (PIA) was analyzed.

Results

Completed questionnaires (n = 4) from three case study examples showed high patient organization satisfaction with their experience of the SHTG process. The feedback from SHTG committee members that was gathered indicated that patient organization participation was generally well received. The number of peer reviews from patient organizations for SHTG advice statements in 2018–2019 doubled to 86 percent of the total advice statements (n = 22), compared with 43 percent (n = 14) in 2016–2017.

Conclusions

Significant progress has been made toward improving the SHTG's patient involvement processes. A dedicated PIA post within the SHTG has allowed for a more tailored support to patient organizations and has encouraged their increased participation in SHTG processes.

Type
Article Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Scottish Health Technologies Group (SHTG) [Internet] Guidance documents for SHTG patient and public involvement [cited 2020 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/technologies_and_medicines/shtg/patient_and_public_involvement.aspx.Google Scholar
Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) [Internet] Patient group submission templates [cited 2020 Apr 16]. Available from: https://htai.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/PCISG-Resource-HTAi_Patient_Submission_Template_v1_30-May14.doc.Google Scholar
Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) [Internet] Guide for patient group partners [cited 2020 Apr 16]. Available from: https://www.scottishmedicines.org.uk/media/2787/patient-group-partner-guide.pdf.Google Scholar
Scottish Health Technologies Group (SHTG) [Internet] Advice statement documents for Freestyle Libre® flash glucose monitoring [cited 2020 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/technologies_and_medicines/topics_assessed/shtg_009-18.aspx.Google Scholar
Scottish Health Technologies Group (SHTG) [Internet] Advice statement documents for robot-assisted surgery compared with laparoscopic resection for the treatment of rectal cancer [cited 2020 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/technologies_and_medicines/topics_assessed/shtg_013-18.aspx.Google Scholar
Scottish Health Technologies Group (SHTG) [Internet] Advice statement documents for autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant [cited 2020 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/our_work/technologies_and_medicines/topics_assessed/shtg_07-19.aspx.Google Scholar
Healthcare Improvement Scotland [Internet] Blog post ‘How the patient voice helps identify technologies to stop cancer in its tracks—Claire Donaghy’ [cited 2020 Apr 16]. Available from: https://blog.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/2019/07/03/how-the-patient-voice-helps-identify-technologies-to-stop-cancer-in-its-tracks/.Google Scholar
Mason, RJ, Searle, KM, Bombard, Y, Rahmadian, A, Chambers, A, Mai, H, et al. Evaluation of the impact of patient involvement in health technology assessments: A scoping review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36:217–23. doi:10.1017/S0266462320000239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guidelines International Network PUBLIC Toolkit. Patient and public involvement in guidelines [cited 2020 Nov 11]. Available from: https://g-i-n.net/document-store/working-groups-documents/gin-public/toolkit/toolkit-2015.Google Scholar
Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Community Engagement. Participation Toolkit [cited 2020 Nov 11]. Available from: https://www.hisengage.scot/toolkit.aspx.Google Scholar