Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T11:29:46.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scanning the horizon of obsolete technologies: Possible sources for their identification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2009

Nora Ibargoyen-Roteta ,
Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea ,
José Asua ,
Gaizka Benguria-Arrate  and
Lorea Galnares-Cordero
Nora Ibargoyen-Roteta
Affiliation:
Osteba, Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment
Iñaki Gutierrez-Ibarluzea
Affiliation:
Osteba, Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment
José Asua
Affiliation:
Osteba, Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment
Gaizka Benguria-Arrate
Affiliation:
Osteba, Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment
Lorea Galnares-Cordero
Affiliation:
Osteba, Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify and rank the sources for the detection of potentially obsolete technologies (POTs).

Methods: A specific questionnaire related to the search strategies and sources used for the identification of POTs and also for ineffective, inefficient or harmful health technologies was sent to the Health Technology Assessment International's Information Resources Group (HTAi-IRG) group. With the obtained information and taking into account the sources used for the identification of new and emerging technologies, a second questionnaire was elaborated and sent to EuroScan and International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) members, who had to select and score them. For the final ranking, the number of votes and the median score were taken into account.

Results: Seven HTAi-IRG members answered to the first questionnaire. Seventeen agencies answered to the second one (thirteen EuroScan members and four more members from INAHTA), but only seven had worked in the identification of POTs and one of them using only experts for it. The remaining six agencies answered the part related to devices, diagnostics, and procedures; five of them did it for settings and programmes and only three for drugs. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (5 votes; median = 2), Cochrane Collaboration (5 votes; median = 3), NICE (4 votes; median = 1), Food and Drug Administration (4 votes; median = 1.5), and EuroScan (4 votes, median = 2) were the most relevant sources for devices and diagnostics.

Conclusions: There is little experience on POTs identification. The identified sources provide mostly indirect information and further research should take place to determine the best use of them.

Keywords

Obsolete technologyHealth technology assessmentIdentification sources
Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 249 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Banta, HD, Gelijns, AC. The future and health care technology: Implications of a system for early identification. World Health Stat Q. 1994;47:140–148.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Berman, P. Health sector reform: Making health development sustainable. Health Policy. 1995;32:13–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Dennet, L, Chatterly, T. Health technology assessment on the net: A guide to Internet sources of information. 10th ed. Health Technology Assessment Unit. June 2008. http://www.pnwer.org/Portals/36/Publications/HTA%20on%20the%20net%2010thedition.pdf (accessed March 2009).Google Scholar
4. Douw, K, Vondeling, H, Eskidsen, D, Simpson, S. Use of the Internet in scanning the horizon for new and emerging health technologies: A survey of agencies involved in horizon scanning. J Med Internet Res. 2003;5:e6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Elshaug, A, Hiller, JE, Tunis, SR, Moss, JR. Challenges in Australian policy processes for disinvestment from existing, ineffective health care practices. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007;4:23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Elshaug, A, Hiller, JE, Moss, JR. Exploring policy-makers' perspectives on disinvestment from ineffective healthcare practices. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24;1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Goodman, CS. HTA 101: Introduction to health technlogy assessment. Falls Church, VA: The Lewin Group; 2004.Google Scholar
8. Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, I, Ibargoyen Roteta, N, Asua Batarrita, J, Benguria Arrate, G, Galnares-Cordero, L. Managing technological innovation in the Basque Country's Health System. What happens with obsolete technologies? Montreal: HTAi; 2008. http://www.htai2008.org/download.php?f=39d15817d911aebf241fdd0f7d434644 (accessed March 2009).Google Scholar
9. Hailey, D, Topfer, LA, Wills, F. Providing information on emerging health technologies to provincial decision makers: A pilot project. Health Policy. 2001;58:15–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Kelly, M. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Centre for Public Health Excellence. Public health programmes and interventions and NHS disinvestment. London: NICE; 2006. http://www.nice.org.uk/niceMedia/pdf/smt/040406item5.pdf (accessed Mar 2009).Google Scholar
11. Mitton, C, Donaldson, C. Twenty-five years of programme budgeting and marginal analysis in the health sector, 1974–1999. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2001;6:239–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Mitton, C, Donaldson, C. Priority setting Toolkit. A guide to the use of economics in healthcare decision making. 1st ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2004.Google Scholar
13. Walker, S, Palmer, S, Schulpher, M. The role of NICE technology appraisal in NHS rationing. Br Med Bull. 2007;81–82:51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Wanless, D. Securing our future health: Taking a long-term view. London: HM Treasury; 2002. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/wanless (accessed March 2009).Google Scholar