Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:17:36.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prenatal Diagnosis, Prenatal Screening, and the Rise of the Tentative Pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Tjeerd Tymstra
Affiliation:
University of Groningen

Abstract

More and more medical technologies are becoming available for the early detection of congenital abnormalities, such as amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, and ultrasound scanning. Recent research has shown that maternal serum can provide a wealth of information on the unborn fetus and that the testing method lends itself to mass screening. Although screening will prevent a great deal of grief, such developments also lead to extreme medicalization of pregnancy. However, owing to the fact that people show a strong desire to avert every possible approaching calamity, the “tentative pregnancy” seems to be unavoidable.

Type
Special Section: Obstetric Technology: A Future Perspective
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

6.Tymstra, Tj.The imperative character of medical technology and the meaning of “anticipated decision regret.” International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1989, 5, 207–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Tymstra, Tj., & Huisjes, H. J.Communication problems on informing pregnant women about alpha-foetoprotein determination in serum. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 1983, 127, 541–45.Google Scholar
8.Tymstra, Tj., Polman, J., Beekhuis, J. R., & Mantingh, A.The consequences of not making use of prenatal diagnosis. Medisch Contact, 1990, 45, 577–79.Google Scholar
9.Yeoh, S. C., Sargent, I. L., Redman, C. W. G., & Thein, S. L.Detecting fetal cells in maternal circulation. Lancet, 1989, ii, 869–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar