PP156 Risk Assessment Of Equipment Used In Intensive Care Units

Abstract

Introduction:

Knowledge and proper use of hospital equipment are essential for preventing adverse events associated with their use. The risks controls for medical devices and equipment are of major importance in ensuring patient safety and the quality of care delivered by healthcare professionals. Monitoring equipment (ME), infusion pumps (IP), and mechanical ventilators (MV) are frequently used in intensive care units, but they are subject to technical, human, and process failures that may pose harm to and even cause the death of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risks related to the use of ME, IP, and MV in the adult intensive care unit (AICU) of a public hospital in Brazil, and to investigate the causes of technical complaints and the adverse events associated with them. We hope the outcomes may serve as a basis for the facility to create mechanisms to diminish the risk and increase the safety and quality of care delivered to critical patients

Methods:

A 12-month prospective, observational descriptive study was conducted using an active and passive search of processes related to: hospital medical equipment use; available human and material resources; training programs and continuing professional education; equipment disinfection, sterilization, and assembly processes; and the hospital risk management measures regarding the reports and actions for technical, human, and process failures and the adverse events and incidents related to them. All the data collected were checked against current Brazilian legislation and the equipment technical manuals. The root cause of every failure and adverse event was investigated.

Results:

The active search identified seventy-five reports on technical complaints in the study period: sixty-five were related to IP, six to ME, and four to MV. The reasons for the complaints included: deficiencies in the quantity, qualification, training, and capacity of professionals handling the devices; inadequate disinfection of MV accessories; absence of or difficulty in accessing the equipment technical manuals; and a lack of preventive and corrective maintenance programs. One single adverse event caused by an IP medication error was attributed to a programing error.

Conclusions:

Failures and deficiencies in the knowledge and management of hospital equipment can potentially increase risks to patients and healthcare professionals. Increasing compliance with Brazil's current legislation related to the technical and operational norms of hospital equipment might create safer practices and improve care quality for critical patients.