Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:00:11.498Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orthopedic Technology for the Elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Göran C. H. Bauer
Göran C. H. Bauer
Affiliation:
Department of OrthopedicsUniversity Hospital Lund
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The term orthopedics was introduced in 1741 by Nicolas André in Paris for “the Art of Prevention and Correction of Deformities in Children” and for 200 years orthopedic institutions were mainly concerned with locomotor problems in children and young adults. After World War II, however, the majority of orthopedic patients were not children. Devas (6) has coined the expression “geriatric orthopedics”, a semantic contradiction which highlights that we now face an increasing volume of elderly patients in whom the locomotor system causes severe problems. For example, in my own institution an orthopedic wing built in 1928 contained 135 beds, the majority of which were occupied by children. Today 10 beds suffice for our orthopedic children. Half of all orthopedic beds in Sweden are used for hip surgery in the very old.

Type
Technology and Health Care for the Elderly
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 59 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Ahnfelt, L., Andersson, G., & Herberts, P.Loosening-infection in the Swedish material of re-operated total hip replacements. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1984, 55, 679.Google Scholar
2.Bauer, G. C. H.Treatment of gonarthrosis. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Instructional Course Lectures, 1982, 31, 152–166.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Ceder, L., & Thorngren, K.-G.Rehabilitation after hip repair. The Lancet, 1982, ii 1097–98.Google Scholar
4.Danielsson, L., Lindberg, H., & Nilsson, B.Prevalence of coxarthrosis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1984, 191, 110–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Devas, M.Geriatric orthopaedics. London: Academic Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hedström, S.-Å., Lidgren, L., Sernbo, I., Törholm, C., & Önnerfält, R.A controlled study of cefuroxime (ZinacefR) as prophylaxis in trochanteric femoral fractures operated with a nail and plate. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1984, 55, 715.Google Scholar
7.Jarnlo, G. B., & Thorngren, K.-G.Early rehabilitation at home of elderly patients with hip fractures and consumption of resources in primary care. Scandinavica Journal of Primary Health Care, 1984, 2, 105–12.Google Scholar
8.Jensen, J. S., & Töndevold, E.A prognostic evaluation of the hospital resources required for the treatment of hip fractures. Ada Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1980, 51, 515–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Laing, W., & Taylor, D.Hip replacement and the HNS. London: Office of Health Economics, 1982.Google Scholar
10.Lidgren, L., Bodelind, B., & Möller, J. Mechanical properties of bone cement with special reference to vacuum mixing and chilling, in preparation.Google Scholar
11.Liedberg, E., & Persson, B. M.Increased incidence of lower limb amputation for arterial occlusive disease. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1983, 54, 230–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Liedberg, E., & Persson, B. M.Age, diabetes and smoking in lower limb amputation for arterial occlusive disease. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1983, 54, 383–88.Google Scholar
13.Liedberg, E., Andersson, L., & Rosén, B. Sociomedical history and prediction of rehabilitation following amputation for arterial occlusive disease, in press.Google Scholar