Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:36:33.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

OP60 Ramucirumab In Gastric Cancer Treatment: An Economic Evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
INTRODUCTION:

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Currently, platinum-based and fluoropyrimidine-based combinations represent the milestone of front-line drug regimens. Unfortunately, there are few treatment options after failure of first-line therapy. Ramucirumab, a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody to VEGFR-2, has been recently approved in the European Union (EU) for use as monotherapy or in combination with paclitaxel as second-line treatment in patients with advanced GC with progressed disease. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of the Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel doublet versus paclitaxel alone in patients with previously treated advanced GC, based on results of the RAINBOW trial (1).

METHODS:

A Markov model has been developed in order to estimate the Life Years Gained (LYGs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for both treatments. The model adopted the Italian healthcare system perspective and the time horizon is that of the lifetime of a patient with an advanced GC. The model considered three distinct health states: stable, progression or death. Transition probabilities were extracted from the Kaplan-Meier curves provided in the trial and cubic/spline function was used to approximate the extrapolation of survival curves for each treatment cycle. An internal model validation was performed to validate the Overall Survival (OS) curves generated by our model simulation. We based our economic analysis on clinical data and resource consumption (drugs, drug administration, supportive care medications, disease monitoring and graded 3 or 4 adverse events) on the Italian setting (2,3). All costs were expressed in euros. Sensitivity analysis also have been performed.

RESULTS:

This cost-effectiveness study demonstrated that, in 2nd-line therapy, the combination of ramucirumab with paclitaxel provides an incremental benefit (+1.54) at high incremental cost (EUR41,616) per LYGs.

CONCLUSIONS:

At a threshold of EUR5,000 for LYGs, based on Italian perspective, ramucirumab plus paclitaxel had less probability of being cost-effective. To our knowledge, our study is the first modeling study from an Italian payer perspective and the first worldwide to examine ramucirumab as a 2nd-line treatment.

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

References

REFERENCES:

1. Wilke, H, Muro, K, Van Cutsem, E, et al. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15 (11):1224–35. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70420-6. Epub 2014 Sep 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Borget, I, Cadranel, J, Pignon, JP, et al. Cost-effectiveness of three strategies for second-line erlotinib initiation in nonsmall-cell lung cancer: the ERMETIC study part 3. Eur Respir J. 2012 Jan;39 (1):172–9. doi:10.1183/09031936.00201210. Epub 2011 Jun 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Banz, K, Bischoff, H, Brunner, M, et al. Comparison of treatment costs of grade 3/4 adverse events associated with erlotinib or pemetrexed maintenance therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. Lung Cancer. 2011 Dec;74 (3):529–34. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 May 17.Google Scholar