OP49 Restrictive Versus Non-Restrictive Drug Reimbursement Systems

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Existing literature shows evidence on the differences in drug reimbursement decisions across countries. These differences are the reason for this study. The main aim of this research is to model the impact of drug reimbursement decisions on health outcomes (that is, life expectancy, healthy life years and mortality rates). In particular, this study is looking at countries that have different acceptance, restriction and rejection rates for drug reimbursement decisions.

METHODS:

The current study is based on a longitudinal dataset with data from nine European countries from 2002 to 2014. This dataset is formed of primary data on drug reimbursement decisions (that is, cancer drugs) collected in the Advancing and strengthening the methodological tools and practices relating to the application and implementation of Health Technology Assessment (ADVANCE-HTA) project and secondary data on life tables and indicators of health and socioeconomic status (from Eurostat and World Bank). Following the longevity model defined by Lichtenberg (1), a panel data model with country and year fixed-effects is run on this dataset in order to model the impact of the level of access to drugs on health outcomes.

RESULTS:

The results show that the rate of adoption of new drugs into a national health system does not have any significant effect on life expectancy. However, more restrictive systems are positively and significantly related with healthy life years. Finally, for mortality rates, higher rejection rates are associated with lower deaths.

CONCLUSIONS:

To conclude, contrary to the public opinion, results show that a more restrictive drug reimbursement system is not related with a worse health outcome, it is either associated with a positive outcome or it is not related.