OP127 The Cost Effectiveness Of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatments For Age-Related Macular Degeneration In The Italian Healthcare Setting

Abstract

Introduction

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a common condition that affects the middle part of a patient’s vision. Typically, it first appears in people in their 50s and 60s. While it does not cause total blindness, it can make everyday activities, such as reading and recognizing faces, more difficult. This analysis aimed to define the resource absorption and cost-effectiveness profiles of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies currently available in the Italian healthcare context.

Methods

A questionnaire was prepared to gather information on specific drivers involved in the provision pathway. The economic analysis was conducted according to activity-based costing methods. A cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out to provide information on the sustainability profile of the treatments available in the Italian setting. Results were reported in terms of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out to test the robustness of the results.

Results

The average absorption of resources per patient along the whole clinical pathway for aflibercept, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and brolucizumab was EUR6,858, EUR1,420, EUR7,930, and EUR5,667, respectively. Brolucizumab was characterized by an unacceptable cost-effectiveness profile (ICER EUR43,454) versus bevacizumab, considering a willingness-to-pay threshold of EUR40,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Compared with ranibizumab, brolucizumab was associated with lower costs (EUR22,368 versus EUR29,333) and higher QALYs (12.8 versus 12.6). Brolucizumab had a higher level of QALYs (12.8 vs 12.7) and lower resources absorbed than aflibercept, with a saving of EUR4,222. Therefore, brolucizumab was a dominant alternative to ranibizumab and aflibercept.

Conclusions

The analysis underlined how brolucizumab is a cost-saving strategy, compared with aflibercept and ranibizumab, and is likely to be cost-effective relative to bevacizumab in the Italian healthcare context.