Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T21:32:15.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making Information Accessible and Useful to Practicing Clinicians: Problem-Knowledge Coupling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Nancy J. Zimny
Nancy J. Zimny
Affiliation:
University of Vermont
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assessments of health care technology will lead to improvements in patient services only if this information is actually used by clinicians. Traditional methods of planning treatment that rely solely on memory limit the clinician's access to and use of the full available body of knowledge in the field. An alternative approach using a computer-assisted methodology is presented as a way to overcome traditional limitations and promote the development and diffusion of knowledge.

Type
Special Section: Assessing The Technology Of Physical Therapy
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , Winter 1992 , pp. 109 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Barnett, G. O., Cimino, J. J., Hupp, J. A., & Hoffer, E. P.DXplain — An evolving diagnostic decision support system. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987, 258, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Bohannon, R. W., & LeVeau, B. F.Clinician’s use of research findings: A review of literature with implications for physical therapists. Physical Therapy, 1986, 66, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Duda, R. O., & Shortliffe, E. H.Expert systems research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1983, 220, 261–68.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Elstein, A. S.Methods and theory in the study of medical inquiry. Journal of Medical Education, 1972, 47, 85–92.Google Scholar
5.Miller, R. A., Schaffner, K. F., & Meisel, A.Ethical and legal issues related to use of computer programs in clinical medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine, 1985, 102, 529–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Ottenbacher, K. J.Evaluating clinical change: Strategies for occupational and physical therapists. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1986.Google Scholar
7.Payton, O.Clinical reasoning process in physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 1985, 65, 924–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Shortliffe, E. H.Medical expert systems—Knowledge tools for physicians. Western Journal of Medicine, 1986, 145, 830–39.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Shortliffe, E. H.Computer programs to support clinical decision-making. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1987, 258, 830–39.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Weed, L. L.Problem-knowledge coupling. Paper read at the New York Academy of Medicine Symposium on Biomedical Engineering, New York, NY, 03 9, 1982.Google Scholar
11.Weed, L. L.Knowledge-coupling: New premises and new tools for medical care and education. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Weed, L. L., & Zimny, N. J.The problem-oriented system, problem-knowledge coupling, and clinical decision-making. Physical Therapy, 1989, 69, 565–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Zimny, N. J., & Tandy, C. J.Problem-knowledge coupling: A tool for physical therapy clinical practice. Physical Therapy, 1989, 69, 155–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed