Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:18:27.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Health Technology Assessment on the Diffusion of MRI in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

David M. Hailey  and
Bernard L. Crowe
David M. Hailey
Affiliation:
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
Bernard L. Crowe
Affiliation:
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A major assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in Australia influenced the early use of this technology and informed policy decisions on future MRI services. However, the impact of the assessment, and of government policy, on the subsequent diffusion of MRI has been more modest, reflecting the limitations of the evaluation process in a complex health care system.

Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , Fall 1993 , pp. 522 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Australian Health Technology Advisory Committee. Consensus statement on clinical efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health, 1991.Google Scholar
2.Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health technology statistics bulletin No. 2. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1992.Google Scholar
3.Bautz, J. B., Schechtman, J. M., Elinsky, E. G., & Paulson, L. G.Magnetic resonance imaging. Diffusion of technology in an ambulatory setting. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1992, 8, 301–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Department of Health, Housing & Community Services. Medicare benefits schedule book. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1992, vii.Google Scholar
5.Drummond, M. F., Hailey, D. M., & Selby Smith, C. Maximising the impact of health technology assessment: The Australian case. In Smith, C. Selby (ed.), Economics and health 1991. Melbourne: Monash University, 1992, 234–71.Google Scholar
6.Hailey, D. M., & Crowe, B. L.The introduction and evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in Australia. Health Policy, 1991, 17, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Hailey, D. M., & Crowe, B. L.The use of gadolinium contrast material in MRI examinations. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health, 1990.Google Scholar
8.Hankey, G. J., & Stewart-Wynn, E. G.An analysis of cranial computerised tomography scanning in neurological practice. Clinical and Experimental Neurology, 1987, 23,187–90.Google ScholarPubMed
9.McDonald, I. G.New technology for old? Medical Journal of Australia, 1989, 151, 3–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.National Health Technology Advisory Panel. Magnetic resonance imaging services. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health, 1990.Google Scholar
11.National Health Technology Advisory Panel. MRI assessment program: Final report Canberra: Australian Institute of Health, 1990.Google Scholar
12.Sorby, W. A., & Baddeley, H.The introduction of clinical magnetic resonance imaging in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia, 1986, 145, 384–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed