Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T14:32:55.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN SWITZERLAND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2000

Richard Cranovsky
Affiliation:
Swiss Medical Association
Julian Schilling
Affiliation:
Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich
Karin Faisst
Affiliation:
Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich
Pedro Koch
Affiliation:
Medical Technology Section of the Swiss Federal Office of Social Security
Felix Gutzwiller
Affiliation:
Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich
Hans Heinrich Brunner
Affiliation:
Swiss Medical Association

Abstract

Switzerland has a mixed public and private healthcare system. All citizens are enrolled in compulsory basic health insurance. A 1996 law allows people to choose among different sickness funds and managed care plans. The federal government is empowered to act on important health issues, but the 26 cantons have prime responsibility in health care and social welfare. They have their own laws on health care, hygiene, hospitals, and social welfare. These laws are not harmonized. The system is complex, with a mix of public (mainly hospitals) and private (mainly doctors' offices) providers. The health services are decentralized. Ambulatory care was traditionally provided in doctors' offices, but the last decade has seen the development of centers for day surgery, group practices, and managed care plans. Decisions on placement, location, and extension of services are decentralized. The payment system is very complex. Current trends include global budgets, cost analyses, and prices related to patient categories. However, coverage policy is developed centrally and includes both traditionally established services and new technologies. New technologies are added to the list only after evaluation by the Federal Coverage Committee. The coverage process integrates health technology assessment (HTA). Coverage can be granted in stages, including limited coverage and temporary coverage. Technologies and coverage can be reevaluated on the basis of registries or assessment information. The structure of the Swiss healthcare system does not lend itself to the establishment of a national HTA program. However, recent moves include the development of a coordinating mechanism for HTA in Switzerland.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)