Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:20:58.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN AN ARGENTINEAN PROVINCE: ADAPTING EXISTING TOOLS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2014

Maria Eugenia Brisson  and
Norberto Schapochnik
Maria Eugenia Brisson
Affiliation:
Lanus National University
Norberto Schapochnik
Affiliation:
Lanus National University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: This study reports on the development of a critical process for health technologies incorporation concerning an Argentinean Provincial Ministry of Health (MOH) in collaboration with the University of Lanús from 2008 to 2010.

Methods: We describe the approach developed to adapt selected international experiences to provincial scenario. Bibliographic review, regulations examination, key informants interviews and iterative adjustments after various stages of consultation and consensus building with main local players, contribution from foreign experts, and piloting of process and instruments for ultimate fine-tuning are described. We examine final proposal in the light of new updated studies.

Results: Analysis of regulations revealed that rules governing the provincial system were historically linked to administrative resolutions in relation to procurement with poor consideration to clinical, epidemiological, organizational, and health policy aspects. Key informants from hospitals, MOH, and other governmental agencies agreed on the lack of a process capable of guaranteeing a decision about health technology incorporation based on a transparent use of the best available information, ready to deal with competitive pressures. This adaptation provided a structured and explicit process (introduction, implementation, and development) as well as essential and supporting tools.

Conclusions: MOH adopted the proposal for its progressive implementation while institutional evaluation capacity develops. Further studies are needed on the value placed on health technology assessment–based processes and recommendations by clinicians, managers, policy makers, and patients.

Keywords

Group acquisitionPurchasing hospitalsBiomedical technologyHealth technologyPublic hospitals
Type
Policies
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 121 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Andalucía (AETSA). Actualización de la Guía de Adquisición de Nuevas Tecnologías. Sevilla: Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Andalucía; 2006.Google Scholar
2. Brach, C, Lenfestey, N, Roussel, A, Amoozegar, J, Sorenson, A, RTI International. Will It Work Here? A decisionmaker's guide to adopting innovations. Publication No. 08-0051. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); September 2008.Google Scholar
3. Ministry of Health of Brazil. Secretariat of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs. Department of Science and Technology. Methodological guidelines for the elaboration of technical-scientific opinion for the Ministry of Health. Brasilia: Ministry of Health; 2007.Google Scholar
4. Briones, E, Loscertales, M, Pérez Lozano, MJ. Proyecto GANT: Metodología de desarrollo y estudio preliminar. Sevilla: Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Andalucía; 1999.Google Scholar
5. Buglioli Bonilla, M, Pérez Galán, A. Evaluación de tecnologías de salud. Rev Med Urug. 2002;18:27–35.Google Scholar
6. Carvajal Tejada, M, Ruiz Ibáñez, CG. Evaluación técnica y clínica de tecnología biomédica en procesos de adquisición: un enfoque en evaluación de tecnologías en salud. Rev Ingeniería Bioméd. 2008;2:34–45.Google Scholar
7. Greenberg, D, Peterburg, Vekstein, D, Pliskin, J. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: Insights from Israeli medical centers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:219–227.Google Scholar
8. Greenberg, D, Pliskin, J, Peterburg, Y. Decision making in acquiring medical technologies in Israeli medical centers. A preliminary study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19:194–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Ibargoyen-Roteta, N, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, I, Asua, J. Informe sobre la elaboración de la Guía GuNFT: Guía para la No Financiación de Tecnologías Sanitarias ya existentes en los sistemas sanitarios. Plan de Calidad para el Sistema Nacional de Salud del Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social. 2009: Servicio de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias del País Vasco (Osteba). Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias: OSTEBA N.° 2007/11.Google Scholar
10. Krauss-Silva, L. Avaliação tecnológica e análise custo-efetividade em saúde: a incorporação de tecnologias e a produção de diretrizes clínicas para o SUS. Cien Saude Colet. 2003;8:501–520.Google Scholar
11. Novaes HMD. Da produção à avaliação de tecnologias dos sistemas de saúde: desafios do século XXI. Rev Saúde Pública. 2006;40:133–140.Google Scholar
12. Trindade E. A incorporação de novas tecnologias nos serviços de saúde: o desafio da análise dos fatores em jogo. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro. 2008;24:951–964.Google Scholar
13. Velasco Garrido, M, Børlum Kristensen, F, Palmhøj Nielsen, C, Busse, R. Health technology assessment and health policy-making in Europe. Current status, challenges and potential. United Kingdom: European Observatory of Health Systems and Policies; 2008. Observatory Studies Series No 14. European Network for HTA.Google Scholar
14. Hansen, NW. From research to policy: Is HTA the bridge? Opportunities and challenges. [Power Point Presentation]. http://www.phgen.eu/typo3/fileadmin/downloads/hansen_research-to-policy.pdf Copenhagen: Danish Center for Evaluation and HTA; 2005 (accessed August 2009).Google Scholar
15. Chase, D. Adapting existing and common core HTAs into different settings. Applicability testing round 1. [Power Point Presentation]. Venice, Italy: NCCHTA WP5 Meeting; 2007. www.eunethta.net (accessed November 2008).Google Scholar
16. Chase, D, Hicks, N, Milne, R, Rosten, C, Bell, E. Adapting HTAs from one country into other settings. EUnetHTA HTA Adaptation Toolkit Version 2 March 2007 and Glossary of HTA Adaptation Terms Updated May 2007. [Power Point Presentation]. United Kingdom: EUnetHTA - European network for Health Technology Assessment Work package 5 document; 2007. www.eunethta.net (accessed November 2008).Google Scholar
17. Craven, M, Morgan, S, Eatock, J, Young, T, Steuten, L, Buxton, M. Assessing the value of medical devices. United Kingdom: University of Nottingham; 2007. Publication 070601 Multidisciplinary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare (MATCH). http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/match/Publications/MATCH_Assessing_the_Value_of_Medical_Devices_070601.pdf (accessed September 2012).Google Scholar
18. World Health Organization. Health technology assessment of medical devices. WHO medical device technical series. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501361_eng.pdf (accessed September 2012).Google Scholar
19. Rajan, A, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, I, Moharra, M. Addressing issues in health technology assessment promotion: Motives, enablers, and barriers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011; 27:55–63.Google Scholar
20. Goodman, C. HTA 101. Introduction to health technology assessment. The Lewin Group. Falls Church, VA; 2004. www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/hta101/hta101.pdf (Accessed September 2012).Google Scholar
21. Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (AETS). Sistemas de detección de tecnologías sanitarias nuevas y emergentes. El proyecto SINTESIS - nuevas tecnologías. Madrid: AETS - Instituto de Salud, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo Carlos III; 2003.Google Scholar
22. Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Galicia - Avalia-t. Programa Detecta-t. Programa de detección de tecnoloxías sanitarias novas e emerxentes en Galicia. Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Avalia-t. Dirección General de Aseguramiento y Planificación Sanitaria. Conserjería de Sanidad. Santiago de Compostela; 2006. Serie Investigación avaliativa A2006/01.Google Scholar
23. Asua, J, Gutierrez-Ibarlucea, I, Lopez Argumedo, M. La identificación de las tecnologías sanitarias emergentes. Documento base para el funcionamiento de la red Sor Tek. Vitoria – Gasteiz: Departamento de Sanidad, Gobierno Vasco; 2002. Informe N Osteba D-00–02.Google Scholar
24 Benguria Arrate, G, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, I, Llanos Méndez, A, et al. Red estatal de identificación, priorización y evaluación temprana de tecnologías sanitarias nuevas y emergentes. Madrid: Plan Nacional para el SNS del MSC. Servicio de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias del País Vasco (Osteba); 2006. Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias: OSTEBA N° 2006/01.Google Scholar
25. Simpson, S, Hiller, J, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea, I, et al. A toolkit for the identification and assessment of new and emerging health technologies. Birmingham: Reviriego E. –Osteba. Basque Office for Health Technology Assessment; 2009. http://www.euroscan.org.uk/euroscan (accessed August 2011).Google Scholar